Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

9/11 Commission hearings gavel to gavel c-span beg. 9 AM

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 08:41 AM
Original message
9/11 Commission hearings gavel to gavel c-span beg. 9 AM
I plan on having it on all day, and I hope they will broadcast them tomorrow as well.

Both days should be interesting, but tomorrow should be VERY INTERESTING with Clarke to end the day.

I was pretty young at the time of Watergate and didn't pay much attention, but I do remember John Dean dropping a bombshell at the hearings.

I wonder if Clarke's testimony is going to fall into that category this time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
harrison Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, if * is defeated, it appears that it is some loyal Republican
Americans and a Democratic Governor, and a Democratic Congressman who actually led the charge. Scott Ritter, Howard Dean, Paul O'Neill, Kevin Phillips, Dennis Kucinich and now Richard Clarke. The most damning testimony has come from the Republicans which may be obvious because they can't be charged with having an axe to grind.

It is refreshing to know that we have true patriots who love their country over a political party.

Bartcop is right, though. The Dems have pretty much failed us in this endeavour (with some notable exceptions).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hey can you give me a link to c-span?
The system I am working on doesn't allow me to open more than one screen at a time without it coming from a link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. here ya go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. c-span said they won't cover the whole day, just till 10:30 ET
I'm starting to get pissed...Anybody know if anyone is broadcasting the whole thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. KPFA broadcasting it all day, I believe
www.kpfa.org

I'm not sure if other Pacifica stations are...

KPFA's Live Broadcast
9-11 Commission Hearings

Pacifica Radio will broadcast live from Capitol Hill the September 11 Commission hearings into Terrorist Attacks on the United States Tuesday and Wednesday, March 23 and 24th. The witness list, just announced, includes Colin Powell, Donald Rumsfeld, George Tenet, Madeline Albright, and many other present and former government officials.

For the first time in public, the Commission says it will examine what the Bush administration knew and did leading up to 9/11.

The broadcasts will begin at 5:30 a.m. PST and last until conclusion.

Pacifica's National Affairs Correspondent, Larry Bensky, will anchor the hearings from Capitol Hill.

For more information on the commission and the scheduled hearing agenda: www.9-11commission.gov
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
22. thx, deutsey, I'll check it out! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. Who is Michael Hurley? Anyone familiar with him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. He is not indexed in Clarke's, Blumenthal's book
All I have. he is asked to wrap up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. I just got an audio stream
just wondering whom it is testifying right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Philip Zelikow - the exec director of the commission reads conclusions
since Hurley was asked to wrap up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike1963 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Mad. Albright starting just now
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. So Hurley starts talking about Bush and is told to cut it short????
He spends 35 minutes about the Clinton years and after five minutes on Bush, he is told to end it??????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
12. Albright - all smiling, in a black suit (for radio audiences)
Took the oath - starting tstimony
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. That's one giant flag of jewelry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. yeah, how did I miss that? ;-)
Hostory is lived forward and read backwards. Talkes about Tanzania.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Nice shot, Madeleine!
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 09:52 AM by librechik
we have a right to display patriotism just like the RWers--only more so, now!

(Madeleine's giant flag brooch, worn on the left shoulder)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Madeleine Albright is tough
go Maddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #13
28. Madeline always wears the most beautiful pins and accessories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #28
43. Class Act Madeline!
I admire her so much.

I loved her opening remarks. She is so compassionate and you could feel how she handled her job with energy AND compassion.

She went directly to the terrorist site in Africa ---and brought the American bodies home!

Did I hear that right? Did she do what Powell has never tried to do,show absolute compassion for brave Americans who gave their lives for our country.

She is smooth and talks openly and honestly IMO.
The pin is just awesome and is worn with such dignity. She makes me proud again to be an American.


You Go Girl!
:loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya: :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. cspan schedule
someone said cspan coverage will end at 10am. however, looking at the various cspan schedules, it may switch over to cspan3. not sure though.


Tuesday, March 23, 2004

9:00 - 9:30 AM
STAFF STATEMENT NO. 5
Diplomacy

9:30 - 11:00 AM
The Honorable Madeleine K. Albright
Former Secretary of State

11:00 - 12:30 PM
The Honorable Colin L. Powell
Secretary of State

12:30 - 1:30 PM
Break

1:30 - 2:00 PM
STAFF STATEMENT NO. 6
The Military

2:00 - 3:30 PM
The Honorable William S. Cohen
Former Secretary of Defense

3:30 - 5:00 PM
The Honorable Donald H. Rumsfeld
Secretary of Defense



Wednesday, March 24 2004

8:30 - 9:00 AM
STAFF STATEMENT NO. 7
Intelligence Policy

9:00 - 10:30 AM
The Honorable George J. Tenet
Director of Central Intelligence

10:30 - 11:00 AM
STAFF STATEMENT NO. 8
National Policy Coordination

11:00 - 12:30 PM
The Honorable Samuel R. Berger
Former Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs

12:30 - 1:30 PM
BREAK

1:30 - 4:00 PM
Mr. Richard A. Clarke
Former National Coordinator for Counterterrorism, National Security Council

4:00 - 5:30 PM
The Honorable Richard L. Armitage
Deputy Secretary of State

5:30 PM
Hearing concludes. Press Availability to follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Everyone except Clarke is "honorable"
The Honorable Samuel R. Berger

... etc

Mr. Richard A. Clarke

...

Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. I heard Peter say that their coverage will go until 12:30
That's when the House begins its session.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
20. ACK! did you see those 2 committee members talking and laughing?!!
while Madeleine is speaking??!!!

Very Funny Guys! 3000 people dead! Ha Ha!

jackasses...This commission is a ridiculous hoax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #20
75. Who were the jerks? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #75
79. Ben Veniste and Thompson, I think n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
21. Albright and the other man were sworn in (under oath) will Powell be ?
I sure as hell hope so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #21
80. He had better be...all of the Chimpco admin asswipes should testify
under oath, particularly Chimpy hisself...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
23. We were not attacked by a noun - "terrorism" - we were attacked by
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 09:57 AM by robbedvoter
individuals. It's them we need to pursue. If we broaden our scope uneccessary, we endanger our security
Continues saying that AlQuaeda is not a finite number of criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. that was her best line
IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Stuck it to the bushes. Questions now
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 10:02 AM by robbedvoter
Comission member holds Clarke's book, mentions attacks back and forth - hopes it will not be partizan - hopes Condi will reconsider and come to testify - applause
Asks Albright about her book account of Tanzania
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
26. whoa!!
Roemer just called out Condi Rice!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. did he ever! I wish he'd added "under oath"--like Madeleine is!
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 10:05 AM by librechik
When Condi refuses, it will be like a confession. Go TIM!

He held up Clarke's book and said that grave accusations had been made, and Condi had denied them. Will she defend herself? Not bloody likely...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. I'm stunned...wants her to reconsider and testify tomorrow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Richard Armitage to replace Rice before the Commission
<snip>
Scheduled to testify Wednesday are CIA director George Tenet; Rice's predecessor, Clinton national security adviser Sandy Berger; and a new witness added Tuesday to fill Rice's slot, Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage. On that day, the panel will review intelligence and national policy coordination.

http://apnews.excite.com/article/20040323/D81G48D80.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suegeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:47 AM
Original message
Armitage has a history of lying to congress
Back when Reagan's boys were on their crime spree ala Iran Contra, Armitage lied under oath while testifying before congress.

Senator (?) Eagleberger caught him in his lie and said to Armitage something like "that's slammer time, sir."

I have the exchange between the two somewhere. If I find it, I'll add it to this thread.

Armitage is a skunk. A lying stinky skunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
78. Whoa, and Powell was right there with him!
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 11:26 AM by MetaTrope
I never knew that. This is like Iran/Contra 2004.

http://independence.net/irancontra/

Contrary to their testimony to the presidentially appointed Tower Commission and the Select Iran/contra Committees of Congress, Independent Counsel determined that Secretary Weinberger and his closest aides were consistently informed of proposed and actual arms shipments to Iran during 1985 and 1986. The key evidence was handwritten notes of Weinberger, which he deliberately withheld from Congress and the OIC until they were discovered by Independent Counsel in late 1991. The Weinberger daily diary notes and notes of significant White House and other meetings contained highly relevant, contemporaneous information that resolved many questions left unanswered in early investigations.

The notes demonstrated that Weinberger's early testimony -- that he had only vague and generalized information about Iran arms sales in 1985 -- was false, and that he in fact had detailed information on the proposed arms sales and the actual deliveries. The notes also revealed that Gen. Colin Powell, Weinberger's senior military aide, and Richard L. Armitage, assistant secretary of defense for international security affairs, also had detailed knowledge of the 1985 shipments from Israeli stocks. Armitage and Powell had testified that they did not learn of the November 1985 HAWK missile shipment until 1986.


So Powell's under oath again today...so what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
27. Uh Oh
somebodies dissin Condi
:nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
31. Roemer: Shouldn't have Bushco have taken the same measures as
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 10:04 AM by robbedvoter
Clinton took after Tanzania? meaning military, diplomatic, intelligence - the whole array
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
33. Powell and Bush wont be under oath . Part of the deal
Can you believe this shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. what is the point of having them testify, just more spin?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #35
54. Yep. Good Americans like bush want to be able to lie on the stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #54
84. Powell was sworn in
so that just leaves bush and condi....who have the need to lie or evade the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
34. I'm starting to think that this commission may actually have an effect
but I'm sure that feeling will pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #34
82. whitewash...
after seeing kean and hamilton this am on the talk shows, I am convinced it will be a whitewash... :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
36. Did you brief Powell, Rice on OBL - what was their reaction?
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 10:11 AM by robbedvoter
Roemer asked Albright. "Yes, we did" What was his reaction?" She believes Powell understood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #36
72. With A "M"

With a "M"
With a "A"
With a "D"

With a M a d a l i n e!

You go girl, you're my hero!



:hug: :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
37. USS Cole....a lame duck President had no choice
It are the Bushies who used the info gained in Dec. to sit and do nothing. Clinton always gets blamed for a do-nothing approach to the Cole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. USS Cole bombed in what oct/nov 2000? it was bush*s call to do something!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
39. When these commision members speak, the tv should
show what party affiliation they are. But I'm sure we'll be able to tell which is a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. They did say Roemer was Indians rep -D. Not with Raygun guy.
I think he is trying to blame Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
40. Raygun navy secretary asking - John lehman -
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 10:17 AM by robbedvoter
What was the status of intelligence when you took over? (Poppy's?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
42. Lehman tries for the OBL- Iraqi connection - Madeline doesn't bite
"with or without Saddam's knowledge"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. When Clinton tried to do anything against al CIAda the rethugs slammed him
for trying to change the focus from their attack on his penis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #42
48. He did more than try he stated it as fact
What is he talking about?

He said that there were numerous contacts between Iraqi secret Service/intelligence and alQaeda....I've never heard anything about that. Did he just make a jump from the assassination attempt to the Embassy bombings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teach1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
45. Lehman rambling... NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. "The President's uhhhhhhhh uhhhh uhhhhhhh uhhhh uhhhhhh uhhh"
...uhhhhh uhhhhhhhhhh uhhhhhhhhh (referring to penis impeachment). :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. Bob Kerrey--
"it's very nice to see you again"...Yes, the team w/ dignity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. he's being a real ass
don't mind the line of questioning, but seems to be grandstanding quite a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berner59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. He's critical....
Thinking that if he's this fiesty against his friends...what he'll be like against Bush's guys...

Albright still didn't back down - plus she keeps bringing up the pre-9/11 mindset...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #50
53. you're probably correct
if he's this nasty now, wait till he gets a hold of Rummy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #50
58. The pre-9/11 mindset.....
Very important point by Albright. It was difficult to get any Congressional support from the Repubs at that time. It was 'wag the dog', etc....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. What I caught was that we should have bombed everything,
even without evidence or targets. Should I thank God he is no longer a Senator?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
52. Bob kerrey wanted his war with Afghanistan. Pissed we went in Kosovo
Attacked Clinton more that all the pukes in the commission. Thanks buddy. I really wonder what you did in Vietnam now that forced you our of the senate, rat bastard! Kosovo was not a threat - was a humanitarian problem, buit to a war criminal like you that is meaningless! :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. Isnt Kerrey a Dem? WTF is he on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #56
59. He is also a war criminal. he wanted his war and didn't get it - not
bnecause of Kosovo - but because of Bill Cohen - GOP - who was the SOD. kerrey was opposed to Clinton a lot. Good riddance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teach1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
55. Albright: We couldn't get options out of the Pentagon NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
57. Gorelick - Clinton's Atty gen assistant asks how did she feel about
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 10:51 AM by robbedvoter
the option to go in Afghanistan when DOD refused (that would be Bill Cohen - the guy who fired Wes Clark from NATO)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teach1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
60. Albright: Difficult to watch...
..the Bush administration dismantle our programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
61. this sounds to me like an indictment of Clinton
this is awful--it is as if they are investigating 9-11 as the fault of Clinton. This is a highly political committee. They are out for Clinton's blood or any one else they think they can blame the tragedy that is Bush, on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #61
62. wow
this guy thompson is a major bushbot!

clenis alert!!!!!!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #62
63. I would get upset at this Thompson guy but I know it's early.
It seems he wants to blame the Clinton people but I think it's because he's talking to a Clinton person. We'll see if he is the same with the Bush people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DustMolecule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #61
64. Albright is doing a wonderful job.....
reminding the commission to 'learn lessons' rather than lay blame (i.e., at the feet of Clinton).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #61
67. It's really aggravating..
I remember these assholes screaming "Wag the Dog". I remember the way the attacked him for those cruise missle strikes.

Lack of military action? GMAB. How much support do you think these scumbags wuold have given President Clinton had he chosen to pursue that option. They would have accused him of starting a war to protect his penis.

Fucking scumbags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
65. Have you noticed the 9/11 Widows on the front row, left side? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
66. I just have to say I think Albright was great
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #66
69. you're right
with a clinton official, it'll be focused on him.
she can't talk about what bush did.

now powell on ... so we'll see how tough they get

UNDER OATH!

yeah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #69
74. Under oath...
but they'll still LIE their butts off!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:21 AM
Original message
"We were more often criticised for over reacting not under reacting"
She repeatedly stated that they must remember to put themselves in the pre-9/11 state of mind.

Indeed there was widespread outrage when Clinton not only deployed military forces but when he dared set foot on a military base...add in "wag the dog" accusaitons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
68. Powell and Armitage on now. Will they be sworn in? Yes!!!!
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 11:06 AM by Vadem
Just sworn in under oath!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #68
71. Will Powell turn into "Miss Thing?"
Jon Stewart pointed out that Powell turns into Miss Thing lately when asked questions ("don't go there, talk to the hand..."). He's now known as Secretary of Thang in my house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
70. OK. Powell
was just sworn in. I feel a little bit better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #70
76. same here too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
73. Didn't have enough evidence to lay bombing of Cole
at feet of al Qaeda (before Clinton left office.) Good job, Madeline. We shouldn't go off half cocked on these serious matters. It WAS up to Bush to take action when HE had the evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #73
77. he is going to be
babied...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
81. Holy Crap!
He's admitting to being briefed on terrorism by none other than Richard Clarke!

I guess that lends our dear Mr Clark some credibility, eh?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #81
83. Admits extensive briefings by Clinton admin. and thanks
Albright and others for them during the transition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #81
85. ROFLMAO!!!...
that picture!!! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kong Donating Member (143 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
86. Powell Is Just Another Whore
Don't forget it.

Powell is just another whore, no more and no less.

He is beginning with a statement covering his own ass, telling how much he was doing. The point is that the fuggin' chimp was the one doing absolutly nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teach1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
87. Powell: We were not given a counter-terrorism action plan...
by the previous administration.

Did I hear that correctly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #87
90. hmmm... Will Sandy Berger and Richard Clarke...
refute that little gem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
88. When will
Presidents Gore and Clinton testify? Does anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #88
97. their testimony will be done privately..
this week with unlimited questioning period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
89. Powell sure is using a lot of words to say... nothing.
Why are they just letting him read some prepared babble speech?

TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #89
91. Ya know...
that is exactly what I was thinking.
He isn't saying ANYTHING really
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #89
96. blahblahblah
We knew the threat, the president wrote to Musharaf, we had to eliminate them not just fire and miss, didn't get a specific plan from previous administration, blah blah blah...

I want somebody to ask about ALL of the administration's dealings with the Taliban.

I want somebody to ask whether the FBI was asked to halt their oversight of Saudis in the US suspected of being terrorists.

I want somebody to ask what they did with the recommendations of the Hart-Rudman report before 9/11, if anything.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #89
131. Exactly
I don't remember when I heard someone blab so much and say basically nothing new. Even when asked to speed up he took 15 more minutes to wrap up. I am now doubtful about this hearing getting anywhere. No important questions even asked yet! :boring: :boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
92. I have to admit, I ONCE had respect for Powell...
and to see and hear what he has become is saddening. I now listen to him with the same lack of respect and know that he no longer, if he ever did, knows how to tell the truth, he has no moral compass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #92
100. See my post #78 above about Powell
:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
93. Wow. That letter is pretty impressive,
considering Shrub had only recently been briefed on exactly who Musharraf was.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #93
98. And he congratulated him on a return to civilian constitutional authority
What military coup?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #93
105. Of course
Shrub didn't write that letter. "...Pakistan is a country with which we hope to..." -- that's much too grammatically correct to be the writing of a chimp. The "concerns" about the Taliban was probably more about getting their pipeline through Afghanistan than about Al Qaeda.

Actually, they let him try the first draft of the letter, but because it began by asking Musharaf if he wanted to be penpals, they turned the job over to Condi...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #105
107. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
94. Let me update Powell so far
Our policy was an abysmal failure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
95. Powell Statement: Facade, Bafflegarb, Slight-of-Hand, Dancing
This is unbelievable. He's sending up a snowstorm of bullshit, making inaction sound like action. For example, he listed a number of key players they incoming madministration "retained"... as though ignoring people in roles not considered immediately profitable for global corporatists was some kind of "action." The truth is they didn't give a shit. It was back-burnered in favor of "going for the gold." Even treating Graham-Rudman as toilet paper and superficially re-intiatating a whole new study was obfuscatory bullshit -- a delay while their energy and petrochemical buddies were splitting up the contents of the federal cookie jar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #95
101. wrap it up
kean urging bowel to wrap it up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #95
102. He is just restating the points Condi made yesterday
eliminate not roll back

Focused form early on

The PRESIDENT was very focused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #102
104. he was focused all right....
"fuck saddam, we're taking him out!" :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #95
127. He just said that they wanted Musharraf to join the CRUSADE
We are DEAD for sure in the Muslim world. Those that weren't believing the extremist Muslim line about everything being a crusade now have the administration's words AGAIN that this is a crusade.

I fear for the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
99. Powell Recap: Clinton didn't do all our work for us
So he's to blame for our failure to prevent 9/11.

Am I getting this right? Powell keeps on harping on this absence of a viable operation plan...

What bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #99
108. time limit
does bowel think that the longer he blabs now, the fewer questions he'll have to answer. ... hoping for the bell that ends class and he can run away .......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:33 AM
Original message
"A new,very complicated form of diplomacy" Powell
You peons wouldn't understand. This is hard stuff. Is he serious? you are right. He is making it sound like they were actually doing anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
103. Ok Colin, we get it, you wanted to have dinner in Pakistan...
Why did we invade Iraq?

TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #103
110. Ready made soundbite:"We did everything we could....
top save the lives of Americans aorund the world."

expect to see that one played over and over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
106. So, is he just going to ramble on until they run out of time???
Hey, asshat.... if the strategy called for more then just launcing cruise missles....why didn't you avenge the attack on the USS Cole???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #106
111. That's what I've been thinking..
run the clock out! It's as if they're allowing him to run the show..read the notes, end it, then he's out of there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #111
114. Is he going to list all seven points?? Shut up and answer some questions!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
109. Oh you warned people about threats? 9/11?
What a fucking sick joke.

And can I be the first to say, SHUT UP ALREADY and answer some questions.

TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #109
115. Just said policy review all came together on 9/4 it was solid......
It took us 8 months but it was a good plan and we made everyone aware of what we were going to do......

Powell Powell Powell why are you lying for them again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
112. "Solid Eight Months of Work"
Including the many lengthy vacations in August that prevented them from even having a meeting about counterterrorism strategy??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #112
121. Mentioned 8 months AGAIN-when 9/11 hit we were ready...
uh I thought they were ready and FOCUSED the whole time....or should have been

This sounds like a dollar late and a dollar short to many people I would suppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #112
123. I hear Powell but he's not saying anything.
Oh good he's finished now. Thank God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
113. chairman:" ah mr. powell we are gonna run out of time"...powell: "ok just
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 11:35 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
let me say...."and he goes on for 15/20....25? more minutes! and is still talking!!! WTF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #113
116. Shaddap!!!!
I wish somebody would sound a gong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #113
119. outside the country
yeah that's why the August 6 memo was titled

BIN LADEN TO STRIKE IN US
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #113
120. run out the clock....
I think he is trying to run out the clock so to not to have to lie too many times...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DustMolecule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
117. Oh for God's Sake!
Cut him off already! (Where's Billy Crystal when you need him! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
118. Your strategy was ready for AFTER 9/11?
WTF kinda spin is this bullshit.

Oh and once again, shut up already.

TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #118
126. Did Clarke present a NEW plan in the first 7 months?
or was he working on the plan that came together on 9/4 and wasthere any calls to do something NOW in the mean time.



Armitrage:Clarke was impatient and pushing the process quite well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #126
134. Yes Armitrage just dissed Powell
So Clarke was very important in creating counter-terrorism ideas, or we can go back to yesterday where the admin called hima disgruntled unqualified baby.

TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
122. More with Iraq??? STFU. puppet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
124. Yea! He finally shut up!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
125. First question (Thompson) casts aspersions on CLARKE!!!!
Unbelievable!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #125
128. armitage
is he wearing an inflatible suit or what?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
129. Hi I'm John Thompson and I'm here to protect the Crooked Administration
This guy is clearly not really looking to get to the bottom of 9-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:40 AM
Original message
No lack of communication or data
So what about the FBI memos? What about the Hart-Rudman report? What about warnings in daily briefings? What about warnings from other countries? They met and discussed all that, and what did they do???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
130. This is a joke. Is this for show? Or are these commission memebers really
more interested in attacking Clarke, and passing blame around than they are in truly investigating what happened? This is bullshit.

We all deserve more than this partisan dog and pony show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #130
132. wtf?
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 11:42 AM by RedSock
bushbot thompson asking bowell to talk about terrorism starting in 1991?

i.e., feel free to babble until your time is up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #132
143. He's only off by a decade-Notice Powell mentioning China and Russia
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 11:47 AM by underpants
This plays into what Clarke said about them being transfixed on old Cold War issues and strategies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
133. Thompson is trying to get Bush1 off the hook by asking...
about 1991, whether more principal's meetings in 1991 would have prevented 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #133
137. What about meetings before 1991?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChavezSpeakstheTruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
135. Is this Powell Fillibustering?
Arghh _ I'm at work. What's going on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
136. Don't ya love it when Powell says, in clarification...
"We had no NEW plan". Doesn't that back up Clarke when he said his plan was thrown back as "wrong answer" do again! The only NEW plan that was acceptable to them was one that was a plan to go after Saddam and Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #136
145. I am at work and following the posts
Didn't Powell say that they didn't get a plan from the Clinton administration to beginn with? Or am I mistaken.

So, according to Powell, they started with zero and just left it at that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #145
151. In answer to a question from the panel, he clarified that they..
had no NEW plan, if I heard correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
138. I was hoping Colin would whip out pics of al-Qaeda's mobile weapons labs
and show tabloid shots of Bin Laden, Clinton and Saddam at a nude beach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
139. Powell says the Middle East was high on the list ???%$^$#
I guess Paul O'Neil, who stated Bush in the very first security meeting wanted Palistine and Israel to fight it out amoung themselves and not get in the middle,was also, along with Clarke, hallucinating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #139
147. remember in June when bombs were going off all over in Isreal...
and Palestine? chimp did NOTHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
140. PLEASE START THREAD 2
hARD FOR DIALUP FOLKS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #140
146. Yes Please do
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
141. is this repuke thompsen giving powell a blow job?
or what... sheesh! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
142. WTF does this have to do with anything now???
I wonder if Thompson could lick Powell's ass a little more??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
144. Jabooty?
Where is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
148. I was wrong....
I really thought this 911 Independent Commission was truly independent and trying to get the FACTS. But after watching C-SPAN this morning I know it is not so we will never get the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
149. He just said they needed to focus on alqaida after 9/11...
So he mentioned Afghanistan and the Taliban. Never mentioned Iraq, so why did we invade Iraq? Why didn't anyone ask that?

TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
150. Locking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC