Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

9/11 Commission Hearing on NOW (1:30 pm) C-Span 3:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:32 PM
Original message
9/11 Commission Hearing on NOW (1:30 pm) C-Span 3:
Just beginning afternoon session. Zelikow reading more of the Staff's statement now re Sandy Berger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Keep us cube rats updated!
Thanks :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. telling of the bombing of the Sudan factory and Clinton's
efforts to continue to strike Al Caeda to destroy the infrastructure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TXvote Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Link to listen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who is this guy speaking now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Philip Zelikow, the person who wrote a book with Condi and
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 01:39 PM by Vadem
was in the White House during 9/11. The widows want him out due to big time conflict of interest.

On edit, he is on the 9/11 Commission, head of deciding what gets seen from the White House by the Commission. Fun, eh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sadiesworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Self-investigation is a republican prerogative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:46 PM
Original message
Philip Zelikow
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 01:50 PM by G_j
'Whitewash': 9/11 Commission Rocked by Bizarre Revelations That Commission Officials Gave Evidence to Own Inquiry

www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0115-11.htm

<snip>
Philip Zelikow, the commission's executive director, worked on the Bush-Cheney transition team as the new administration took power, advising his longtime associate and former boss, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, on the structure of the incoming National Security Council.
<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DustMolecule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Here's more information about the Zelikow issue
<snip>
The 9-11 Family Steering Committee and 9-11 Citizens Watch, two separate groups, are demanding the resignation of Philip Zelikow, executive director of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States, after information surfaced over the weekend that he participated in Bush administration briefings prior to Sept. 11 on the threat al Qaeda posed to the country.


"We believe that the very integrity of the commission is at stake here, and that he should resign immediately," Kyle Hence, co-founder of Citizens Watch, said Monday.


On Saturday, the Family Steering Committee wrote a letter to the commission arguing that Zelikow has a conflict of interest because he could potentially be held culpable for failing to heed warnings about al Qaeda prior to Sept. 11.


"It is clear that should never have been permitted to be a member of the commission, since it is the mandate of the commission to identify the source of failures," the committee wrote. "It is now apparent why there has been so little effort to assign individual culpability. We now can see that trail would lead directly to the staff director himself."
<snip>

http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0304/032204c1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Zelikow still reading staff report on Clinton's admin. and
his efforts to strike with cruise missiles. Why in the hell don't they get to Bush's admin and what he did before 9/11?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. I LOVE The Inflections Of His Speech
Highlights the specific words he wants us all to remember. Ah, concern here, thoughtful questioning there. What a sham this guy is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. yep n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. he's a pedant, speaks like one.....not to mention
it sounds like his voice is being played back at a slightly slower speed

reminds me of Will Ferrell doing Janet Reno
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. It's all that nitrous he's been huffing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. SOOOO this continual listing of action by the Clinton administration...
sure is a huge contrast to what chimpy did which was ZERO!! Think the murkins will notice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. He is skipping the Millemium plots, going directly to USS Cole..
Doesn't want to discuss Clinton's successes, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yeah, what's with that?
Is there any way the citizens of the US will be able to read this for themselves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. Wow, criticizing Bush admin.
Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld felt the Cole prob. was stale and wouldn't do anything about now. They offered no solutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Rumsfeld too busy with staff transition
and dealing with Russia over nuclear arms treaty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indie_voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. AKA, not focused on terrorism like Clarke said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. Rumsfeld said the military plans after 9/11 were not
satisfactory and they would need more plans. I thought they doing so very much before and after 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. Is CLINTON on the list?
If people are trying to give him all the blame, maybe HE'S the one who should be testifying.

:headbang:
rocknation
NYC Peace March Pics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. he is testifying in private later
pay attention! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. Well, DOD stated the same thing Albright did, i.e, that US
would not have supported any large scale military operations BEFORE 9/ll happened, and that's why they also did nothing about the Cole!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Cohen said Clinton shared his feeling that terrorism was major...
problem and that Clinton was willing to spend money to support fighting it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Cohen states all public leaders must be accountable.when
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 02:12 PM by Vadem
things go wrong. Calls Congress on refusing to fund terrorism stating that Congress said Admin. was speaking hyperbole to boost their funding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
23. did Zelikow infer that they wanted to go into Afghanistan before 9/11?
that's the first I've heard of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
24. Here come Cohen
but he's a repug. I don't know whether I can watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. Yes, he is a repug that Clinton appointed as Secty Defense n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
25. William Cohen, Secty Defense under Clinton, up now...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaitykaity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Thanks for the heads up.

That other guy just wasn't happenin' for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. Cohen
(a Republican)

www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/govt/admin/cohen.htm

President Clinton fulfilled his wish for a bipartisan Cabinet by appointing Republican William S. Cohen to head the Pentagon. The former senator from Maine is anything but a yes-man. In Congress, he demonstrated an independent streak, criticizing some of the administration's defense policies, including the presence of U.S. troops in Bosnia. But he also criticized pet GOP defense projects, including the B-2 stealth bomber. As secretary, Cohen's most critical challenges include reconfiguring the post-Cold War military and responding to the sexual harassment and assault charges that have plagued the armed services.


Sworn in: Jan. 24, 1997 (nominated Dec. 5, 1996, confirmed Jan. 22, 1997)

Succeeded: William J. Perry

Previous occupation: U.S. senator from Maine 1979-97; U.S. representative (R-Maine-2) 1973-79; member, Senate Armed Services Committee, Governmental Affairs Committee, 1979-97; member, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, 1983-91 and 1995-97, vice chairman, 1987-91; board of directors, Council on Foreign Relations from 1989-97, chairman, Middle East Study Group, 1996; author; mayor, Bangor, Maine, 1971-72; Bangor City Council, 1969-72; instructor, University of Maine, 1968-72, Husson College, 1968; assistant Penobscot County (Maine) attorney, 1968; attorney, 1966-72.

Education: Bowdoin College, 1962 (B.A. in Latin), and Boston University Law School, 1965 (L.L.B. cum laude).

Hometown: Bangor, Maine

Date of Birth: Aug. 28, 1940
<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
27. Cohen going back to Reagan's Admin
saying he drafted legislation while a senator to combat terrorism, but was eschewed by the Pentagon. Interesting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. What was that smattering of applause for?
I zoned out for a min. Hard to believe with his dulcet tones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. Good on him.
It's like the commission is going only as far back as Clinton. What, there was no terrorism before Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
29. KPFA has it online
Not sure if anyone announced it, but www.kpfa.org is streaming the hearings for 2 days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
32. Streaming Live ...Link HERE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
33. Now talking about Congress cutting funds
for combating terrorism during Clinton's admin. Says they cut tens of millions from Nunn-Luger...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
35. Who was Clinton's first Sec of Defense?
Christopher?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. If I'm not mistaken, I think it was Cohen... Clinton appointed more
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 02:17 PM by Vadem
Repugs than any Dem. president I'm aware of. I was P.O.ed over his pug appointments.

Oops, I was wrong.

Sworn in: Jan. 24, 1997 (nominated Dec. 5, 1996, confirmed Jan. 22, 1997)

Succeeded: William J. Perry


Thanks c_j!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. Christopher
secretary of state, I believe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #35
109. Was it Les Aspin...
He later died...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
39. Cohen: Clinton Admin did far more than other prvious admin to combat
terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Where are you watching?
There's something else on C-Span and the shrub is everywhere else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. C-Span 3 is where the hearing is being shown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. CNNInternational
but also have it on CSPAN3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #47
57. Thanks
When I went out this morning it was on C-Span1. I have terrible sound on C-Span3 always for some reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #41
52. Here's the link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueStateGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
40. Is * saying anything worth cutting away for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Is this fuck
deliberately doing this now so they interrupt the hearings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
42. Bush interrupts hearings for babble speak
Has he no shame. He is nowhere ever and now he has something to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #42
55. It's "earlier this day" - the librul media decided to cut the 9.11
Watching Richard Clarke on Charlie Rose (captions) :"Bushco hardly waits for me to endorse John kerry - so they cansay this was all part of a partisan thing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. Outrageous!!
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
46. Bush just preempted Cohen's testimony!! He is acting like he is a bold
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 02:20 PM by alfredo
leader, hitting on his 'goals' for the future in a pretend cabinet meeting. This is total bullshit!! contact CNN and let them know we knew what they and bush are doing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. What happened to C-Span? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. Watch It Here ...LINK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #51
68. Thanks
That settles my troubles. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #68
78. You're welcome
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 02:38 PM by proud patriot
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. Grrrrr!!!!
I can't believe CNN keeps cutting away!! I don't get CSpan 3 and when I called CSpan, I was told they *have* to cover the House and Senate because it's in their "mission statement."

This is SO infuriating!! The most important event in years and the media isn't showing it -- yet THREE networks showed the Chimp's speech the other day. Unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
48. I see W preempted TV coverage. Cohen talking on pacifica
This is the guy who was helping the Contras, had Wes Clark replaced at NATO and made the sliming shorus with Shelton.
Interesting how all stations - CNN, MSNBC are covring W WHICH IS NOT EVEN LIVE!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #48
58. The jackass didn't say anything. (Bush*)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
49. I'm listening
on NPR since I don't get CSPAN 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
54. he just said they are wrong
to be patting themselves on the backs about no terrorist attacks in the past 2 years on US soil. He said a mouthful there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. Last thing he said on TV - before they cut off to W
Still expect him to backstab Clinton now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
56. "road runs through Baghdad, and RIGHT THROUGH Jerusalem"

Cohen said it right up front: Jerusalem is THE PROBLEM....and we must discuss Israel up front and honestly...and stop the deceit coming out of bush* and sharon.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #56
60. it was a bold statement
glad he said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. He was sounding very strong
The few minutes I could actually hear him. I'm kind of surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
63. Three occassions where they thought they had
UBL, but it was not substantive enough info. Very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #63
69. Now about "Wag the Dog"
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 02:33 PM by tishaLA
saying the pharmaceutical bombings was not a wag the dog scenario. "The president never used the military to serve a political purpose. ...I would never allow the military to be used for a political purpose...That accusation emerged again when we decided to attack Saddam Hussein...I got a call the day taht operation was launched. I got a call from Speaker Gingrich...tehre was a rage in the House..this clearly had to be politically inspired. ...I went to the well of the House and testified for three hours that the President never sought to use his power for political purposes".

Amazing.

Edit: Sorry about typos and ellipses. I was typing what I could get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #69
74. Good job and fast typing! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
64. Three different occasions when they were ready to attack
militarily on Bin Laden but all intelligence said they didn't think they had enough--one time they considered shooting down an airplane that they thought Bin Laden was on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #64
67. Cohen is rocking
just brought up the accusations against Clinton ala "Wag the Dog" and saying that Clinton never never used the military to mask personal difficulties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
65. Cohen is talking about 'Wag the Dog'
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 02:31 PM by Cush
and about the poisonous tone at the time and how Clinton was criticized for his attacks against the camps
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #65
71. Clinton "true to his word"
no wag the dog, Gingrich accusations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:30 PM
Original message
Cohen: Clinton never used the military for politcal purposes
The charges of "Wag the Dog" are false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
66. Ha!
Did you hear that? He just mentioned the wag the dog accusations lobbed by the repukes. He said he wouldn't have been a part of anything like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #66
72. He is nailing the congress and the senate
for what they did to Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #66
75. Mentioned Newt Gingrinch, didn't he?
I couldn't quite hear (streaming at work)--didn't Cohen specifically call Newt Gingrinch's name out when he was condemning the "Wag the Dog" bullshit aimed at Pres. Clinton?

If so, sweet.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #75
85. yes indeedy...
the REPUKE congress is to blame!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
70. He spoke for 3 hours before Congress telling them that at no
time did Clinton try to wag the dog to avoid impeachment proceedings after the Desert Fox attacks on Saddam Hussein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #70
76. Dayum
I'm so glad he got that in. The hypocrisy of the people who were outraged at Clinton's judicious use of the military yet cheer for Bush's irresponsible war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
73. Cohen is shooting down the RW talking points
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
77. Kerrey questioning Cohen now. Let's see if he attacks him...
as he did Albright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #77
79. Didn't take long, did it?
This guy is such a putz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #79
81. Nope
He's asking questions that have already been answered: why wasn't the military used earlier, more, etc.? Complete with dramatic "but they were SO BAD"'s just for emphasis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #79
82. He's grandstanding, as usual. Ask him a question, already! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
80. Bob kerrey still doing karl's work. Guy slaughtered civilians in Vietnam
and is now showing his criminal nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #80
83. Kerrey is an unmitigated asshole
he is nothing but a lackey, he is one demensional and it just goes to show what a fucking idiot Daschle was for appointing him after Cleland resigned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #83
91. Yup.
I just don't gt him. Is this supposed to be a show of his "independence"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #83
96. Shame on Cleland for resigning too. No excuse.
Shame on Daschle, shame on kerrey - Zell Miller must be jealous! :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
84. Cohen recommended Gen. Zinni, praising him over Gen. Shelton,
Chief of Jnt. Chiefs. Zinni was made to retire after he said that we would need 200,000 troops in Iraq.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #84
87. Kerrey should be relieved of duty
Kerrey is a fucking jackass!!!!! What the fuck is he trying to do. Has he been promised something? He is a fucking PNAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #87
94. kerry is a delusional pompous fucking ass...
he is making no fucking sense! Someone shut his trap PLEASE!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #84
88. Cohen saying no one pre-9/11 could have gotten support to attack
CLinton OR Bush.

Kerrey is openly arguing with him.

Cohen:Not one country would have been with us to attack Afghanistan without 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #84
101. They did not have positive info it was OBL on Cole
Why didn't Powell, Condi, Rummy keep investigating?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
86. love it Cohen is turning the questions back at Kerrey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #86
92. I am ready to go through
the fucking roof. Kerrey is nothing but a traitor pure and simple. I hope when Clinton testifies that he eats Kerrey for lunch. Egotistical self centered bullshit son of a bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #86
93. wtf is with Kerrey? (yelling)
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 02:49 PM by G_j
he thinks NATO, Congress, the American ppl would have supported invading Afghanistan before 9-11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
89. Bob Kerrey in his meandering fashion
making a statement posing as a question. He's just repeating what he said to Powell! WTF? "I do't understand why the military wasn't given a priority in the fight against UBL...I don't understand why the military wasn't given a dominant role and I wonder if you think the military was under-utilized (gawd what a phraseology) in the fight against militant Islam."

Cohen: Fatwa was against me too. Could have put massive force in Afghanistan against the support of Pakistan and the neighboring countries. General Zinni...commander of CENTCOM...made a number of reccomendations...helped (in dealings with Musharaff) to stop millenial attacks. ...They weren't "risk averse"...we had lethal authority. Sandy Berger said we werent sendig a legal summons to him, we were trying to kill bin Laden....there was never a recommendation that came that said let's take military action and let's to it. Do you think it's reasonable, Sen. Kerrey, ...for Pres. Clinton to come to congress and say we want to go do this. (Chatter) In Kosovo, everyone was saying it's a bad idea and we had to endure without the support of congress. And Pres. Clinton, and Pres. Bush could not have gone to congress to make this request. Clinton had the allies, NATO, but I dare say there is not a single country that would have allowed him to go to war with Afghanistan and congress would not have allowed it either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
90. Kerrey seems to be channeling the spirit of Scoop Jackson
(The "Democratic" idol of the neocons.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #90
97. Too bad his name is Senator Kerrey
Some folks don't know that there were two.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
95. Kerrey is an incredible asshole!
Cohen brought out that Kerrey was adamantly against Kosovo but the President(Clinton) was able to persuade the American people that it was the right thing to do and as a consequence saved over a million lives. Kerrey is throwing a temper tantrum cause he didn't get his way re Kosovo and he is going to make every Clinton witness pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:52 PM
Original message
Why does Kerrey get so much time?
Cohen is doing a great job for Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
98. Kerrey thinks he's a pit bull
Instead, he just seems arrogant.

"What was the military objective on August 20, 1998?"

"Did you consider putting a special ops team there rather than relying on sattelite?" (wow he talks fast. both do. In fact, he talks like a character from a 40s film, like someone who plays the rough)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DustMolecule Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
99. He didn't talk so fast when he was 'questioning' Powell
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
100. ABC Thompson back to the USS Cole...Cohen said, as
Albright said, that they didn't have absolute proof that it was Bin Laden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
102. Jamie Gorelick up questioning now (she's a Dem)...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
103. Thompson's job is to exculpate Bushco. Did it with Albright too
"Do you think Bushco should have started his adminisration with a war?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #103
105. Righto! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
104. Gorelick: We are having 'selective' leaks on info
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 02:59 PM by Cush
talking about how we could have gotten Bin Laden, but we were over- ruled by the higher ups
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
106. Gorelick: what's with the leaks from CIA? Did they know? Didn't?
Was Tenet telling them a different story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
107. talking about the Asprin Factory
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 03:07 PM by Cush
They had evidence that they were going to be used to manufacture Chemical Weapons and that it was built under heavy security
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
108. Lehman up now
trying to pin the blame on the Clinton admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
110. Cohen says the war on terrorism will not be won on the battlefield...
but by the sharing of information and good police work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #110
112. Iraq "aside"
"a big aside" .... well as Clarke says, there are terrorists there NOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #110
113. Cohen has repetitively slammed bush* war and policies....and his
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 03:28 PM by amen1234
remarks about Israel being the root of the problem are poignant....

Cohen has continuously explained in great detail, why the bush* all-war-all-the-time-and-everywhere approach is NOT the right approach to terrorism...and we cannot overcome terrorism unless we realize that Israel IS THE PROBLEM...."We must engage the Israel problem RIGHT NOW and not wait until after the November elections."

Cohen is a brave testifier....a real NATIONAL HERO to stand up to bush* and his minions....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
111. Tim Roemer questioning Cohen now... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #111
114. This is a good guy. Why do we only have 2 good people on that commission?
All the rest are nazis - starting with Bob Kerrey!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #111
115. Roemer says Indonesia very important to us in the future...
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 03:28 PM by Vadem
asking what we can do to educate the madrasses; Cohen says we need very agressive diplomatic actions...Arab world looks through two lenses--how we treat tthe Iraqis and how we handle the middle Eastern conflict.

We must stand up to human rights, not by using clubs; give people a sense of hope, economic, educational... We must be engaged...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #115
116. Cohen was released and thanked for his testimony...Applause
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 03:32 PM by Vadem
when he left. Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz up next! Is that Gen. Myers there also?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
117. Evil has just entered the room
Rummy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #117
119. AND Wolfowitz, his Igor nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
webtrainer Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #117
121. w/ Wolfowitz and Gen. Myers too
yicky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #117
127. I know what you mean. I got a chill when I first got a
look at Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
118. time for Rummy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zookeeper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
120. Also being broadcast on MSNBC...
with interruptions. Like Bush addressing his cabinet. (That couldn't have waited?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
122. Sworn in: Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Gen. Myers. Rummy...
speaking now. Whoooeeeee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #122
124. Skeletor
Gloating over the Spain attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
123. Ugh, Wolfowitz too!
Double Evil!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
125. PLEASE start a new thread!
rummy's will be LONG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #125
128. Do the Mods start the new thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
126. RUMMY'S UP!!!
Edited on Tue Mar-23-04 03:35 PM by rocknation
Time to start a new thread, perhaps?


:headbang:
rocknation
NYC Peace March Pics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #126
129. I've alerted the Mods to start a new thread....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
130. New thread started here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #130
131. Locking for discussion here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC