Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Al-Quaeda must be eliminated"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 08:15 PM
Original message
"Al-Quaeda must be eliminated"
So, it's been a few years. Why haven't they done it? Supposedly they had a much better plan than Clinton. Why hasn't it worked? And what is it? Condi, why haven't we nuked Al-Quaeda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was just thinking about that!
It's clear they all got the same script, because they're using the *exact* same words: "roll back" vs. "eliminated."

They say bombing the training camps wouldn't have worked. Getting bin Laden wouldn't have worked. This that and the other thing wouldn't have worked, because we needed to *eliminate* Al Qaeda. So even if all that is true, what the heck are they saying WOULD have worked? What was their plan, and if it would have worked, why isn't it now that we've got most of the world on board to help implement it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadProphetMargin Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If you want an excuse, you'll find one. The GOP: The party of
excuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. love the graphic in your sig n/t
mind if I borrow it sometime?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadProphetMargin Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Go ahead...I swiped it from someone else here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mulethree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Roll Back
If you make a change to a computer system, and its not working out for some reason, you "roll back" the change to an earlier version.

If your database server crashes, then - when it re-starts - it will read it's logs, find any partially completed work that hasn't been committed, and "roll back" the uncommitted changes to their status before the uncommitted work was started.

If you put in a tax-cut and then decide to rescind it, you "roll back" the tax cut.

If you are doing a complicated multi-part financial transaction, and decide you can't complete it, then you "roll back", or undo any portions that have been completed or partially done - also "unwind".

So, to me, "roll back" is trying to undo something that you started that isn't working out. So, when I hear it applied to al-Qaeda it always sounds like an admission that we in fact started al-Qaeda up, have decided it was a bad idea, and want to un-do what we started.

Could it be, that when we riled up the Muslims to form the mujahedin back in the early 1980's, and preached islamic fundamentalism to them to rile them up to fight our biggest enemy for us, trained them in terrorist ... oops er guerrilla tactics, and funded them over $3,000,000,000 - that we oops accidentally did a bad thing that is now not working out and needs to be "rolled back"?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unknown Known Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Because Al-Qaeda is largely financed by Saudis
That's why they won't go after them.

http://www.jcpa.org/jl/vp504.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think their plan was tax cuts
:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-04 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. That's easy,priorities


"The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."
- G.W. Bush, 9/13/01

"I want justice...There's an old poster out West, as I recall, that said, 'Wanted: Dead or Alive,'"
- G.W. Bush, 9/17/01, UPI


<6 months later>

"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts,
3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02)

I reckon if 6 months after 9-11 Al-Q's leader wasn't a priority any more,elimination of the rest of the organization couldn't have been that important. But what was important?....oh yeah,I forgot. LOOTING IRAQ! That's what's really important to these clowns :mad:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC