Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How much did chasing Clinton's penis take away from our fight on terroris

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
heidiho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:40 AM
Original message
How much did chasing Clinton's penis take away from our fight on terroris
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 11:41 AM by heidiho
There is a question I want to see asked today. How many hours, how many millions of dollars and how much presidential time and energy went into defending Clinton from right-wing attacks.

I believe it was significant. Will anyone ask it or has anyone asked it yet on this panel?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. a bj is so much more important than fighting terrorism
don't you know that? </sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. But it didn't stop there...
After they were successful in impeaching Clinton, they were also successful in getting all of Clinton's initiatives overturned, some by executive order, including his plan to fight bin Laden and the terrorists in Afghanistan, with drone planes and keeping subs and missiles close by to attack on notice. Bush withdrew all those assets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. excellent question...
but of course, it IS all his fault; he HAD to be investigated; why, if this kept up, interns could be exploding semen all over Washington, now there's an imminent threat to our nation if ever I heard one....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. ROFL
"interns could be exploding semen all over Washington..." }(

Sounds like a sticky situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I just get this image of a bunch of Monica clones, in blue dresses,
blowing up like balloons and popping goo all over....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. This was a long term conspiracy by the wrong wing
calculated to demonize liberalism while facilitating the attack on America. This a pattern of treason that began with the raygun administration, progressed through newtism and culminated with the pnac neo-cons completing the destruction of a free America. The deregulation of the media by raygun made it possible for the non stop prevaricating propaganda that has hypnotized and demagogized the weak minded sheeple into believing the jingoistic hype.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Ding ding ding! We have a winner!
RIP, Fairness Doctrine. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LEW Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm glad you brought this up
Because all the people who have testified have stated that going to war before 9-11 would probably not have happened. I keep thinking ok what was going on at that time and I keep coming back to the repubs fixation on the Clinton and the impeachment. I remember they kept saying Clinton was using terror as a way to remove attention away from him. This has been brought up also, in the testimonies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yup, they accused him of the 'wag the dog' thing, and just look at them
now, using every distraction they can think of to try to make us look the other way while they run this country into the ground...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Its a question that I asked myself when all the BS was going on
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 12:07 PM by burythehatchet
How the heck can a president do his job if he has to fight Gingrich, Scaife, DeLay, the friggin House Managers (remember that inept crowd?)

Yes I wonder if the elves, including Mr. Ann Coulter, and Lucianne, and horseface Linda Tripp, (and on and on) feel any responsibility. Sorry stupid question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. The overall tenor of the time was POISONOUS..
and it was by design.. They wanted Clinton be be ineffective.. They stripped him of any authority, because, by setting the parameters, he could NOT suggest anything bold, or he would have been accused to trying to "change the subject".. This was not accident folks..

They would have spent 200 Million if they had needed to.. They wanted him compliant,apologetic, and weakened.. No one in the republican house or senate would have listened to ANYTHING he had to say..and if NY would have been attacked during Clinton's term, they would have said.."See we told you"..

Unless we gain control of at least one chamber in the fall, it will be the same for Kerry if he wins..

Republicans do NOT just accept the fact that they lost, and then plan for the next election.. They set out immediately to retaliate against the winner, to punish them for winning..



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think that the CIA undermined
Clinton with bogus info to make him look foolish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Tenet was no friend of Clinton
One thing I fault Clinton for is THIS..

He was too eager to appear bi-partisan and had people in his administration who were not loyal to him and his admin..

I don't think that Reno was the best choice for atty gen
Tenet was surely not the best choice for CIA
Cohen was not the best choice for secy def

He thought he was being bi-partisan, but he set himself up for treachery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Neither Tenet nor Freeh liked Clinton.
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 01:13 PM by keithyboy
The only problem with Clinton appointees as I can tell looking back, is that most were not as ruthless as the appointees of Republicans. Most Clinton appointees came into office with the misguided notions that they could make a positive difference and give good, honest public service a chance. How naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. I have lost some info I had on Poppy
Bush being in regular contact with the CIA all through the 90's. This is his prerogative as a former President but, according to what I read no other President, has exercised this prerogative.

What happened here could turn of some tid-bits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Found this one link so far


Now that Bush Junior occupies the White House, Bush Senior receives frequent CIA briefings (his prerogative as a former president). "In July 2001, Bush personally contacted Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah to ‘clarify’ his son's Middle East policies. Also during the summer of 2001, Bush forwarded his son a North Korea policy plan penned by ‘Asia expert’ and former ambassador to Korea, Donald Gregg. Gregg is a 31-year CIA veteran and the elder Bush's former national security adviser whose expertise involved participation in the Vietnam-era Phoenix Program (death squads), Air America heroin smuggling, ‘pacification’ efforts in El Salvador and Guatemala, the ‘October Surprise,’ and the Iran-Contra operation (for which Gregg received a Bush pardon in 1992)." (20)

(19) Steve Lohr, "Gerstner to Be Chairman of Carlyle Group," New York Times, November 22, 2002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Thanks, this is something that could be explored
further. It does suggest that Gregg and Poppy were working together prior to Bushboys taking the throne. What the felonious Gregg was doing in the capacity of an "Asian Expert" also would be nice to know. I assume it wasn't in an official capacity based on his, uh, er... resume. This could be a lead to a much broader involvement of Poppy and the BFEE in "unofficial" intelligence work. IMO this is very important to understand how Clinton's intel may have been impacted by Poppy's involvement. I assume that the BFEE was not interested in seeing Clinton succeed in his foreign policy, IMO the BFEE would have done anything they could to give him a black eye, including compromising national security.

This is a potentially huge issue IMHO. Did Poppy undermine Clinton's intelligence on terrorism during the 90's with his own "informal" intelligence network? Clinton missed the targets in the Sudan and, if I remember correctly, accidently hit a hospital.

But what is potentially explosive is what kind of info Clinton was getting on Iraq? Throughout the 90's we have some real crazy intel on Iraqi WMD's, but it seems clear that this was all BS. Who kept this bogus info alive? Why?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. I actually had a RWinger say to me
That if "Clinton hadn't been so obsessed with his penis, 9/11 would not have happened."

I let her have it. WTF? It's the repugs who were obessed with his penis. All of the impeachment stuff effectively tied his hands from doing anything!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. THIS, not Clarke's book
is the elephant in the room.

this is why more direct proactive action against al Qaeda was politically impossible prior to the coup of 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. I don't believe that 9/11 or the Iraq war
would have happened without the impeachment. Everytime Clinton took military action, he was accused of trying to distract from the impeachment. I think he would have gone into Afghanistan but felt that he couldn't because of lack of support from the Republicans.

I think Clinton felt he couldn't fire Freeh and Reno but he should have. I blame them both for much of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobinA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I Agree
and have thought this since 9/11 evening. I don't even blame W as much for 9/11 as I do the whole Monica/impeachment/Whitewater fiasco promulgated by the Repub establishment at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ysabel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
20. Poison and Penis's - this thread...
reminds me of a headline here in wisconsin from years ago...

poison pens and penis's...

did you all know tommy thompson has a sword for a penis...?

headline frontpage - typo - wisconsin state journal:

THOMPSON'S PENIS A SWORD

(had to do with his line item veto power)...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC