Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

9/12/01: CIC Dubya's untimely and bizarre Iraq fixation--Clarke...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
skeptic9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:08 PM
Original message
9/12/01: CIC Dubya's untimely and bizarre Iraq fixation--Clarke...
... via blogger T. Dunlop:

'I expected to go back to a round of meetings examining what the next attacks could be, what our vulnerabilities were, what we could do about them in the short term. Instead, I walked into a series of discussions about Iraq. At first I was incredulous that we were talking about something other than getting al Qaeda. Then I realized with almost a sharp physical pain that Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz were going to try and take advantage of this national tragedy to promote their agenda about Iraq. Since the beginning of the administration, indeed well before, they had been pressing for a war with Iraq. My friends in the Pentagon had been telling me that the word was we would be invading Iraq sometime in 2002. On the morning of the 12th DOD's focus was already beginning to shift from al Qaeda. CIA was explicit now that al Qaeda was guilty of the attacks, but Paul Wolfowitz...was not persuaded.

Later, on the evening of the 12th, I left the Video Conferencing Center and there, wandering alone around the Situation Room, was the President. He looked like he wanted something to do. He grabbed a few of us and close the door to the conference room. "Look," he told us, "I know you have a lot to do and all..but I want you, as soon as you can, to go back over everything, everything. See if Saddam did this. See if he's linked in any way...."

Many of today's news stories have recounted this section of the book, but the ones I've heard have all left out the rest of the story:

"I was once again taken aback, incredulous, and it showed. "But Mr. President, al Qaeda did this."
"I know, I know, but...see if Saddam is involved. Just look. I want to know any shred..."
"Absolutely we will look....again." I was trying to be more respectful, more responsive.
"But, you know, we have looked several times for state sponsorship of al Qaeda and not found any real linkages to Iraq. Iran plays a little, as does Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia, Yemen."
"Look into Iraq, Saddam," the President said testily and left us. Lisa Gordon-Hegarty stared after him with her mouth hanging open.

In the Presidential Emergency Operations Center the cast was decidedly more political. In addition to the Vice President and Condi Rice, there was the Vice President's wife, Lynne; his political advisor Mary Matalin; his security advisor, Scooter Libby; the Deputy White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten; and White House communications director Karen Hughes. The monitors were simultaneously blaring the coverage from five networks. On one screen, I could see the Situation Room. I grabbed Mike Fenzel. "How's it going over here?" I asked. "It's fine, Major Fenzel whispered, "but I can't hear the crisis conference because Mrs Cheney keeps turning down the volume so she can hear CNN...and the Vice President keeps hanging up the line to you." Mrs Cheney was more than just a family member who had to be protected. Like her husband, she was a right wing ideologue and she was offering her advice and opinions in the bunker.'

From http://www.roadtosurfdom.com/surfdomarchives/002119.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mikey_1962 Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. this fixation is not bizarre
Hussein ordered a hit on his old man; I know I would would be irked if someone went at my dad...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No matter if 580 young troops have to die to get your revenge ??
It's nice to have all those young people willing to die for you, just at the snap of your fingers. Yes, it would irk me too but I would not ask other people to die because of it...and on top of that, lie to get them to die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptic9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. There's a time and a place for everything. The morning after 9/11...
... in the White House Situation Room is neither the time nor the place for a "Commander-in-Thief" to plan to settle old scores. His dislike for Saddam was totally unrelated to the al Quada attack that had just killed thousands of Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Lynne Cheney remarks scare me.
Who died and made her an adviser?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptic9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Why did political operatives outnumber security experts in the PEOC?
Apparently, Lynn Cheney, Mary Matalin, and Karen Hughes were in the Presidential Emergency Operations center to fashion political "spin". This political "emergency" seems to have been considered more important than operational strategy and tactics, judging from Clarke's head count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC