Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Official 9/11 Investigation Thread #3

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:54 PM
Original message
Official 9/11 Investigation Thread #3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gorton fishing for ammo
to use against Clarke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. and to blame Clinton....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robsul82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Geezus.
"Your government failed you - Clarke" should be the headline on all papers across the nation.

Later.

RJS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Dammit I missed the beginning
DAMN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. Clarke's opening statement brought a tear to my eye
and gave me goosebumps .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Subs were off the coast of Pakistan
ready to attack at a moments notice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Clarke is not afraid
to say exactly what happened and name names. Just stated it Tenet's decision not to go after hunting camp in 99
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Groton is trying to cover *' ass big time
Clarke has the guts to apoligize to the victims families and the American people and this f*&^er is being patently partisan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. Side Scroll on CNN
Bush/Cheney will only meet with the Chair & Vice Chair of the Commission. Clinton/Gore will meet with THE ENTIRE COMMISSION
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Bush and Cheney
believe they are above meeting with peons. Their arrogance makes me ill. What laws in our country can stop this lunacy?

It just looks bad for them, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. These arrogant pricks forgot those same peons put them in office!
Well, the Supreme Court did, but that's another issue!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #16
34. The people didn't put them in office. So, they're not accountable..
to the people, you silly goose. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #34
55. bush said himself that he didn't feel he had to explain himself to anybody
a while back, can't remember what that was in reference to - and I think he finished that remark with something like, "some people may need to explain themselves to me.."

damn, now I gotta go google...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Wow
I didn't realize they were going to going to testify at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annxburns Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. More details please
... for those of us at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Ben Veniste questioning now:
Focusing on the role of the NS advisor and his role in the Clinton admin. as opposed to the Bush.

Clarke: Similarity: I was told by each of the four NS advisors with which I worked, that if I ever had reason to believe I needed to act on something, I had an open door to act... The difference between Bush and Clinton is policy development. I worked directly with the advisor in Clinton and worked with deputies in Bush admin.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lalena Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. Got a radio? My local NPR station is broadcasting it. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty charly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. !!!
big ben
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
33. They aren't "testifying" - only *meeting*. No oaths for Bush* or Unca Dick
They will not swear or affirm to tell the truth; they are above that sort of thing. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. he is fearless!
I love this guy! I wonder if chimpy* is watching... Nah, probably taking his nappy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. he just went after Congress & the Media
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 02:12 PM by Cush
says their profiling of failed covert ops missions damaged the CIA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. Ben-Veniste is up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty charly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. ben veniste's
the applause getter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
18. Clarke just explained
how we might have nipped AQ in bud. Said human intelligence eviscerated in late 80's early ninties. Layed some of it on R. Gates former CIA Dir, NSC. Says Cia is risk averse, because of congressional pressures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Remeber, late 80's, early 90's
in other words, Poppy Bush eviscerated the intelligence community, not Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
39. They closed down embassies that are now being reconstructed 100
a year at a time after 9/11. The embassies were closed in the 1980s because they became a target and liability. The congress claimed they closed them because of the cost, but it was really because it made terrible press whenever they were attacked and we had to evacuate. But when they were ordered closed during the Reagan-Bush era, the main criticism was that we would lose the opportunity to put people on the ground that could develop relationships with the locals and get human intelligence. I believe there is a great archived article about this in the Washington Post but I couldn't tell you the year it was written.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
20. Clarke getting a round of applause
for apologizing to America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. Ben-Veniste thanks Clarke for his apology (gets applause)
says he was the first to do so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robsul82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
22. Ben-Veniste credits Clarke's apology...
...brings up that it's the first such apology from anyone, to sustained applause for Clarke.

Later.

RJS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
25. I missed it. Why the applause?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Ben Veniste thanked Clarke for his apology and said he was..
the first to do so (re 9/11).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
26. Summer of 2001: Threat Level was the highest I've seen (Tenet as well)
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 02:17 PM by Cush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
27. This man comes across as sincere and has the details...
the inquiry needs. He is very imposing, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Its the motherload
of information coming out now. No politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. Clarke: incomprehensible that FBI information
didn't get to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoDesuKa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. Applause for the Apology
I wasn't aware until Ben-Veniste said so, that Clarke's apology is the first time that anyone in the government has done that. The room broke out into applause, as it does every time government stonewalling is mentioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
31. Clarke: I thought/felt the threat was here in the US
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 02:18 PM by Cush
others felt it would be in Saudi Arabia or Israel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
36. Clarke says he wasn't informed about Moussaoi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
37. Was info re Massoui ever related to you? Clarke: No. ...
Asking about flying planes into buildings;

Clarke: The info re AC using planes as weapons--info was old (5 or 6 years old)"



So much for Condi's lie about using planes as weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
38. Clarke asked the FAA to spread the memo about the possible hijackings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
40. Oh boy, Kerrey is up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. here we go...
thanking clarke for his sincerity in a very insincere manner...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Babbling
Can't he thank him more gracefully?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
42. Clarke: I knew what the price would be (for speaking out)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Damn that was on the mark
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty charly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. b. kerry
just loves the sound of his own voice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
k in IA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. My god - would he ask a question and shut up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
47. Kerrey up now; thanks Clarke for his sincerity in his apology....
Kerrey tells him to not take it personally for all the press attention directed at him (wha??)

Kerrey: we must have honest disagreements, where we have common ground; you almost always provoke a good argument. I disagree with on the Galinda project; I believe Galinda would have necessitated war.

Kerrey Warmongering again!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:39 PM
Original message
It's "delenda"
as in "Carthago delenda est," Carthage must be destroyed. Cato the Elder believed that destruction, not containment, was the only recourse after the Third Punic War.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
48. Kerrey: You're not supposed to give your opinion here
you're supposed to ask questions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Clarke eyes him suspiciously
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 02:26 PM by Jim4Wes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoundRockD Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. Kerrey hasn't yelled at Clarke yet. Is he afraid of him? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #53
60. Clarke so calmly answered the ham
that Kerrey couldn't go anywhere. Clarke is great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #48
66. Kerrey Is Auditioning For VP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
51. Is that the Gore report he is speaking of or the Hart-Rudman...
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 02:30 PM by Vadem
or are the reports the same (I forget) regarding airline security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
52. Clarke brings up TWA 800
and how there was a Presidential Commission to look into how to upgrade scurity. Most were programs were carried out, but others rejected due to cost and Government Bureaucray

The Secret Service wanted programs, but the Budget/Treasury Dpets rejected it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
54. Thompson accuses him of being a flipper flopper
Clarke brings up the Time 2002 article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #54
63. What's that about?
flip/flop/Time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
56. Clarke just explained his recommendations
for aircraft defense in DC and Airport security. Some implemented, most unfunded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
57. Clarke talking about Time article now.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
58. Thompson:Book or press briefing which is true?
Clarke says it is disceptive. HE is now citing the TIme article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #58
62. He did a press background to diminish the Time article
as it hurt the administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
59. Bush People were concerned about the Time 2002 Article
so they worked something out (a release) to lesson the criticism at the WH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoDesuKa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
61. NY DU'ers: Is This Televised Here?
I'm listening to WBAI, but I don't know if it's on TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #61
112. It's on C-Span 3 and CNN - not on local TV
It's on WBAI and WNYC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
64. I love Clarke's tone, it is even, not agressive or defensive...
even when the asshole that is fronting for Bush just did Rove's bidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #64
72. I like his tone also.
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 02:36 PM by cat_girl25
NO theatrics or anything. The repukes are trying to get a hysterical reaction or something out of him but he's not budging.

Good on ya, Clarke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
65. Clarke: I was asked to make a case to the Press
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 02:35 PM by Cush
So I did it...I've done for several presidents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. Moving right along....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoDesuKa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #65
68. Horrified Reaction is Unwarranted
That's part of the job, isn't it? The president tells you the official line, and you support it. Happens all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #65
69. Yeah, accentuate the positive
eliminate the negative, or something like that :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #65
70. I was told to highlight the good things and not highlight the bad
as I have done for other presidents.

Thompson:"Ooookay" smart ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoDesuKa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #70
77. Thompson Not Naive
Thompson's been a government executive. He can't really think that subordinates are allowed their own spin on policy, can he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoDesuKa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #77
86. Condi Lied
Condi said not Al Qaeda plan was in place; Clarke says there was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #77
91. Big Jim Thompson was Gov of IL when I lived there.
What a creep!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoundRockD Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #65
78. The Bushies must have forgotten that Clarke is a republican...
He knows how to get tough right back at them. He seems to be beating them at their own game. Thompson is so obviously partisan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #65
81. Breaking news
Politician is shocked... SHOCKED... to hear that an administration might spin the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hexola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #81
97. I think that NUKED Thomson ! -
He tried to come out and wack Clarke...but that exchange made Thompspon look like he was grasping at straws...

about time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
71. For the cube rats here...
What is he saying about the Time article???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #71
80. I think the Bushes made a strategic error waving it about
Clarke says that the Bush admin asked him to counter a previous press piece by talking to Time about the 'positive' things the administration had done about terrorism, and to minimize the negative things. Clarke says that since the President's office asked him to do it, he did it since he worked for them.

In other words, BushCo is attempting to criticize Clarke for doing what they asked him to do -- spin a bit in their favor in Aug 2002. To my ears, it made BushCo look pretty shallow on this (worried more about image than substance...as always).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #80
108. Nobody asked????????????????????
Who in the Bush Administration asked him to spin/lie?

I watched that and he studiously avoided saying who ordered him to give that press briefing.

That's the next biggie folks!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #71
101. He said the Time article was sensationalized.
So the Bush Administration asked him to do a press release which would accentuate the positive things that were done by the Administration. Words were used selectively in the press release. For example, he would claim something was "approved" but the reality was that it was never funded. Or he would say something was "approved" even when it only made it through the two lower levels of the executive branch, and Bush had not yet seen it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
73. Anyone HAVE the Time article?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaulGroom Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #73
75. Here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emboldened Chimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. cool...thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaulGroom Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #76
79. no problem... hope you enjoy myself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
74. "It is unusual when you are told every day that there is an urgent threat"
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 02:38 PM by Cush
on the 8 months it took to get things approved
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
82. Deputies reworded his plans
Replaced "Eliminate" with "Erode". Eliminate was to bold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
83. oooh, Clarke says in so many words that Thompson is acting obtuse!
hahaha! Thompson looks pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
84. BAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #84
90. Yup. Thompson through a big ol' roundhouse right.
And whiffed! Big time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
85. Clarke: You just seemed concerned by the tone (to Thompson)
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 02:42 PM by Cush
meaing, you're upset that I'm not kissing Bush's ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
87. I think Thompson is about cry or somethin
Clarke said it bothers (the tone in the book) him but that as a staff member he makes Prez policy look good in Time article, Thompson said with all respect a lot of this bothers him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
88. Clarke: We gave the new Admin two plans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
89. That was hilarious!
Paraphrasing here
Clarke: I think that what is bothering you is the tenor and the tone.

Silence

Thompson: More than that is bothering me. blah blah blah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #89
95. See my above post re "Big Jim Thompson"
He's an A-1 Asshole!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #89
100. My vcr is recording this session with Clarke.
Along with this am's Washington Journal. I think I will keep this one on file for a while instead of taping over it. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
92. Clarke might need SS protection
I'm worried for teh guy. He is layin it all out there. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
93. Clarke: There was no plan to use US Forces to remove the Taliban (?)
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 02:46 PM by Cush
is that what he said?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoundRockD Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #93
96. Off the subject. Is Clarke appearing on Larry King Live tonight? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #96
99. Paula Zahn with Ken Starr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #99
104. What?
Who gives a flip about Ken Starr?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #104
109. just sayin its Clarke vs Starr - don't shoot me :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #96
102. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoDesuKa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
94. Gorelick Pissed at Condi
She's giving Clarke opportunities to Condi-bash. If Condi wants to reply, she can raise her right hand and testify.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
98. Whoa, talk about straight truth...
Clarke just shot Condi down, big time!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #98
107. OK OK
What did he SAY? Come on, for cube dwellers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #107
113. Gorlick read out a statement quoting Condi in which she stated...
what comprised the bush plan for going after Al Qaeda and then asked Clarke if it was an accurate statement and Clarke simply answered "No, it is not"! It was great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Niendorff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #98
110. bigtime.

Gorelick: "Is that statement {Rice's characterization of Bush anti-AQ strategy} accurate?"

Clarke: "No, it is not."

-----

wow.


MDN

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emalejim9 Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:50 PM
Original message
Just made Yahoo...news
Ex-Adviser: Terrorism Not Urgent for Bush


This is great!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoDesuKa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
103. Body Bags
"This country needs body bags before it takes threats seriously . . . "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoDesuKa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #103
111. Clarke: "They Called Me Obsessed"
They told Clarke to stop being so obsessed with Al Qaeda. We're big and mighty, and they're small and puny ... Lighten up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
105. Attacking the
DC mindset that "needs" body bags to change policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
106. He just named Congress
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 02:52 PM by Cush
they wouldn't give them programs they wanted.

Says only body bags make a difference.

He was aksed why were you so obsessed with Al Qaeda? only 35 people have died? What's the threat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emalejim9 Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
114. Rate this story......before it gets freeped
Ex-Adviser: Terrorism Not Urgent for Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indigo32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
115. New Thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC