Is anyone listening to Hannity?

[Tim4319]

He just had a lady on his show who claims to have the smoking gun to prove Madeline Albright and Richard Clarke lied to the commission. Now, she is suppose to have all of this documentation stating Sudan wanting to had over Bin Laden and the Clinton Administration turning them down. Mind you, she said she does not work for the United States government. Hannity was begging her for copies of this information and she seem to be real hesitant.

Did anyone else hear this?

[mtnester]

1. I did

She said she was some kind if Sudanese consultant, but she sounded a little older. I had to get out of the car then.

[Jack_Dawson]

2. Puh-leaze

Hannity's phony scoops are laughable and discredited every time a la Drudge.

[CatWoman]

3. Hammity and that goddamn one-trick pony

give it up already, Sean.

[Kahuna]

4. Sean caught in a lie fed to him by that Monjour Ajit(sp?) guy...

that he has repeated thousands of times over the airwaves. He was bleating about that yesterday. I turned him off. The woman could be that woman who looks like she's on meds formerly of the Clinton administration. I don't remember her name.

[Tim4319]

5. First name Janice?

[readmylips]

10. The unloved Linda Pig Tripp....

who else kisses a$$ like that.

[Turbineguy]

6. I do not have a TV

in the toilet.

[blimbaugh]

7. Hannity has his nose up Geo's rear so far you cant see his ears

Did you know that the "W" in Geo W stands for weasel????

[shooga]

8. hannity=insanity

Hannity is a paid THUG



hannity=insanity

[Auntie Bush]

11. I sure wish he would sneeze!

Yuck at the thought! :puke:

[bobbyboucher]

9. How Desperate.

Some old drunk woman smokin a cig and calling Shemp Hammity is their response to that shellacking? As if!

[Gloria]

12. Yeah, I walked into the kitchen where freeper Mom was chopping

stuff and heard a good part of it...

I heard him say that if she gave him the documentation he would follwup. He also claimed that it was hard to him to follow up(sic).

Yeah, right. Tell me he doesn't know this phony story. I bet she was a plant. Isn't this story part of every jackass' book of talking points???
What, is he out of the loop on talking points????

[librechik]

13. the lawyer for the 9/11 commission debunked this shit yesterday

Hannity is pathetic. Maybe if this guy had retained an even handed, objective tone in his program over the years, he wouldn't have to start eating his own guts now.

These bastards are going down.

[Grins]

14. Sudan? Again?

Give it up Hannity.

Hard to belive that Hannity would choose to get his information from a Sudanese! Sudan was one of the most hard-core terrorist states in the world; not to mention a sanctuary, training base, and supporter for al Qaeda!!!! That Hannity would accept any information from a regime that his beloved do-no-wrong-take-no-responsibity-it's-Clinton's-fault Bush administration has kept Sudan on the terrorism list. They are on that list because Sudan has done nothing to end its domestic slave trade, and little to resolve its civil war that has killed over two million of its citizens. This shows Hannity's one scary freako.

Who the heck's side is Hannity on?

Comments by Richard Cressy and Gayle Smith on Richard Miniter's book "Losing Bin Laden:

First, Mr. Miniter recycles old, false Sudanese claims that the Clinton White House declined access to Sudan's intelligence files on al Qaeda and that an unnamed CIA official declined an offer from Sudan in 1996 to turn Osama bin Laden over to the United States. No one should believe these allegations by Mr. Miniter's source, Fateh Erwa - a Sudanese intelligence officer known for his penchant to deceive - that there was an offer to hand bin Laden over to the United States. Certainly, no offer was ever conveyed to any senior official in Washington. Had the Sudanese been serious about offering bin Laden to the United States, they could have communicated such an offer to any number of senior Clinton administration officials. It did not happen.

"Mr. Miniter also claims that Sudan repeatedly tried to provide voluminous intelligence files on bin Laden to the CIA, the FBI, and senior Clinton administration officials and would be "repeatedly rebuffed through both formal and informal channels." Absurd. In fact, it was precisely the other way around. On multiple occasions, and in venues ranging from Addis Ababa to Virginia, Washington, New York and Khartoum, the United States aggressively pressed the Sudanese to prove their alleged commitment to cooperating on terrorism, by severing their close ties with known terrorists, arresting specific individuals and providing specific intelligence information to us. Yet, despite frequent promises of cooperation, presumably in the hopes of getting off the terrorism list and out from under U.N. sanctions, the Sudanese consistently failed to deliver. This should come as no surprise, because Sudan in the mid-'90s was one of the most hard-core terrorist states in the world. Its fiercely militant leader, Hassan Turabi, turned Sudan into a sanctuary, training base and active supporter for a range of Islamic terrorist organizations, including al Qaeda."

Source is Washington Post, 23 Sept. 2003, "Clinton NSC Attacks Miniter".