Hey Condi...if Clarke committed perjury today then file charges.

[blm]

Go ahead.

This is the most important episode in American history, and if Clarke committed perjury today like you want gullible Americans to believe then have Ashcroft file charges against him.

[BOSSHOG]

1. Go on Condi, sick john on dick

you are extremely pathetic aren't you girl? Great idea blm.

[strategery blunder]

2. I don't think she has the courage to file charges

only to find out that Clarke was right. That would be even more embarrassing for the cabal.

[Supormom]

3. Notice that Condi refuses to testify under oath.

[Arbustosux]

4. why do you think she doesn't want to testify?

its that same crap that I hear from repubs: "Clinton lied under oath"

They don't want Condi to commit that cardinal sin....

[blm]

5. Heh...well then SURELY they must INSIST perjury charges be filed on Clarke

After all, wouldn't lying about 9-11 be more important than lying about an affair?

Surely the Republicans must be concerned that Clarke will get away with lying under oath.

Condi must not waste time by saying his testimony is "scurrilous" and go right to charging Clarke with perjury.

[justgamma]

6. She said that she'd love to testify,

but it's a matter of "principle". Excuse me, but I didn't know they had any.

[Old and In the Way]

7. hahahahahaha

Eggzactly.

And now it's more important then ever for Condi not to go under oath. Can you imagine the questions that would be asked? Would Condy commit perjury under oath? I think that would be too much for even for Condi.

[alcuno]

8. Perjury is lying under oath.

It's no crime to lie to the media.

[Sliverofhope]

9. is there any way we could file charges?

I'd like to toast Colin Powell and Rumsfeld. And Tenet, too, why not?