Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN Poll: Should Condeleezza Rice...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Beloved Citizen Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:40 AM
Original message
CNN Poll: Should Condeleezza Rice...
...testify publicly before the 9/11 commission?

Yes 78%

No 22%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Doug Decker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Voted...
and here's a link: http://www.cnn.com/

It's at the right bottom of page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I clicked on that link, and yikes


Man, if looks could kill :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kitkatrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. You know,
if she hadn't sold her soul to the * Admin, she'd be a fairly attractive woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Groosalugg Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Fairly attractive???
Are you kidding me???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kitkatrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Well, there is a qualifier to that statement. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Hi Groosalugg!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Groosalugg Donating Member (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Oh yes...isn't Condi just so attractive?
:eyes:

She's the ugliest person I've ever seen. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Beauty eminates from the soul.
should could be beautiful if her soul were beautiful, but it is fugly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. It doesn't say UNDER OATH.
Edited on Thu Mar-25-04 09:47 AM by revcarol
That is the most important thing, so that she will commit perjury.

Please put link.:)

Edit; lOOK AT THEIR FRONT PAGE ARTICLE. Against Clarke, without even mentioning his major assertions. SHEESH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Just voted Yes
...still running 78-22% in favor of her testifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Voted!
78% to 22%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Babel_17 Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Done: As of 9:54 AM it's ...
Yes 78% 27680 votes

No 22% 7849 votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Babel_17 Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Nice "mug shot" of Condi on that page
She looks like an angry perp in that photo. :)

Here's the image location in case the page changes.

hxxp://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2004/ALLPOLITICS/03/25/911.commission/top.clarke.rice.ap.jpg

Substitute "tt" for the "xx" in the url above. I did that because otherwise the image would be displayed in this thread ..... and that's a "no-no" afaik on these boards. Displaying the image would amount to bandwidth theft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. Who in the hell....
are the 22%ers?
Let me guess!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LEW Donating Member (809 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. voted
78% yes

22% no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
President Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. yes, but...
...she better serves herself (and definitely the nation) by simply resigning.

Ever since she uttered the quote below, she proved that she was EITHER a liar or an incompetent. Personally, I choose to believe the latter, but either way, she has no business being the NSA.

"I don't think that anyone could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. why the hell would someone
vote no..:shrug: unless they were worried some actual "truth" may come out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. That's right.
Even if you believe chimpy and the gang, why wouldn't you want a full investigation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
18. She will lie even if forced to testify
Her true soul (no offense meant to cobras)



:evilgrin:

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC