Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does Condi need permission from Bu$h to testify?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:51 AM
Original message
Does Condi need permission from Bu$h to testify?
My fright winger cube mate just said that Bu$h has to give Condasleeza permission to testify, is this true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChickMagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes
He has to waive the separation of powers clause. He refuses to do that unlike other presidents who have done that willingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The Pub Masters will have to confirm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Separation of powers?
Is the 911 commission part of another branch of government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Condasleeza claims she'll testify if daddyO lets her
sort of like, I'd go to the party if my dad would let me. But you don't want to go at all...what a lame excuse. Condasleeza..get your lying sack of shit self down to the commission and slap that lying hand on a bible! Otherwise, shut the hell up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I all goes back to
something to HIDE

they are cutting their own throat----- both of then (Condi & Georgie)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. You got it.
The commission is a Presidential commission, same branch of government as the President.

NOT a Congressional investigation.Different branch.

Bush is ORDERING all to stonewall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. The administration that wants to...
...amend the Constitution suddenly wants to stand firm on a "Constitutional principle" as Condi calls it and not allow the National Security Advisor to testify on a matter of huge importance in our nation's history.

No, I'm sure they have nothing to hide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. No, not Bush, Cheney and the cabal don't want her to testify
she tends to make mistakes. She is not considered a good liar. She can't lie because of the oath require. She spoke to the Commission in private, not under oath. These sessions are now under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Commissions Say She Was A Great Witness


I really don't understand why she would take herself to Faux and not to the Hearing Room. Who is advising the Security Advisor? It must be her Boss.

That is the problem. How can he advise anyone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC