‘Your Government Failed You’
Could the terror attacks have been prevented? Clarke’s testimony to the 9/11 commission raises the prospect that the answer might have been yes.
WEB EXCLUSIVE
By Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball
March 24 - In deft and sometimes dramatic testimony, former counterterrorism official Richard Clarke today did new political damage to the Bush White House by laying out a bold scenario by which the September 11 plot might have been unraveled.
The prospect of a U.S. government apology is hardly compatible with the basic White House line on September 11—that there was no way that the plot to hijack four civilian airliners and use them as weapons could have been foreseen. But the real significance of Clarke’s testimony is that he “connected the dots” in a way that for the first time demonstrated how the plot might well have been disrupted—if only the Bush administration had recognized the urgency of the Al Qaeda threat.
Yet the commission’s staff reports suggest the new Bush administration was moving slowly on many fronts: Clarke himself was upbraided in January 2001 when he asked for an immediate “principals” meeting of cabinet chiefs to develop an urgent new anti-Al Qaeda policy and was told to instead work with a committee of “deputy” chiefs.
By the summer of 2001, when this committee had finally drawn up recommendations, many of the "principals" had already departed Washington for their annual vacations and the meeting was not held until Sept. 4, a week before the attacks. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4594652/