Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

a CHALLENGE from the Center for American Progress!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 12:04 PM
Original message
a CHALLENGE from the Center for American Progress!
Beat the Progress Report

Yesterday, on Hannity and Colmes, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice said "the assertion that somehow the Bush administration wasn't paying attention when we came into office is just false." But, despite Rice's comments, we were unable to find a single instance where Rice, Vice President Cheney or President Bush said "al Qaeda" or "bin Laden" in public between Bush Inauguration and 9/11. (The closest thing we could dig up – despite extensive searches on Nexis and the White House website – was a routine written extension of an executive order dealing with the Taliban.) During the same period, however, we were able to identify roughly 400 times that Rice, Cheney and Bush publicly mentioned "tax relief" or "tax cut." Prove you're better than the Progress Report! Send any instance of Rice, Cheney or Bush uttering the words "al Qaeda" or "bin Laden" in public between 1/20/01 and 9/10/01 to pr@americanprogress.org. The first person to submit a successful entry (which we can verify) will receive a free copy of "Deliver Us From Evil" by Fox News Anchor Sean Hannity signed by the members of the Progress Report team.

http://www.americanprogress.org


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. very funny
they were 100% asleep at the wheel (not so funny)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. As a bartcop cartoon said...
Prior to 9/11, Geroge Bush thought "Al Queda" was the shortstop for the Atlanta Braves.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. That is pretty f'in revealing
Maybe R. Clarke isn't lying? ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. more from today's email "Progress Report
I highly recommend signing up for this daily report. these people are the new "war room"....

SUBSTANTIATED – CLARKE'S ASSESSMENT OF BUSH PRIORITIES: Clarke told the commission that terrorism was an "extraordinarily high priority - certainly no higher priority" in the Clinton administration but that the Bush Administration considered it "not an urgent issue" before Sept. 11. This is consistent with internal government documents obtained by the Center for American Progress which show that the Administration actually moved to downgrade counterterrorism as a strategic priority before 9/11 in favor of traditional law enforcement. As Newsweek noted, the Bush Administration moved to "de-emphasize" counterterrorism despite increasing signs of an imminent al Qaeda attack. When "FBI officials sought to add hundreds more counterintelligence agents" to deal with the problem "they got shot down" by the Bush Administration.

SUBSTANTIATED – BUSH DID NOT CONSIDER AL QAEDA URGENT: Clarke said that "George Tenet and I tried very hard to create a sense of urgency by seeing to it that intelligence reports on the al Qaeda threat were frequently given to the president and other high-level officials." He said the CIA "continually informed about the threat" throughout the summer. But unfortunately, Clarke said, "I don't think it was ever treated that way" by the President. This claim is substantiated also by the public record: Clarke's January memo marked "urgent" to Condoleezza Rice asking for a top level meeting to prepare for an imminent Al Qaeda attack was ignored for eight months. When one of the commissioners asked Clarke "is that eight-month period unusual?" he noted "It is unusual when you are being told every day that there is an urgent threat." Clarke's assertion is also substantiated by President Bush himself, who told Bob Woodward "I was not on point" in fighting terrorism before 9/11, and that "I didn't feel the sense of urgency" about terrorism before 9/11.

SUBSTANTIATED – ANOTHER OFFICIAL COMES FORWARD: Salon.com editor Sidney Blumenthal reports that Clarke's assertions about the Bush Administration's complacency are now being corroborated by another former Bush national security official. "Gen. Donald Kerrick, who served as deputy national security advisor under Clinton and remained on the NSC for several months into the new Bush administration, wrote his replacement, Stephen Hadley, a two-page memo." Kerrick noted he said in the memo "they needed to pay attention to al-Qaeda and counterterrorism. I said we were going to be struck again. We didn't know where or when. They never once asked me a question nor did I see them having a serious discussion about it. They didn't feel it was an imminent threat the way the Clinton administration did. Hadley did not respond to my memo. I know he had it. I agree with Dick that they saw those problems through an Iraqi prism. But the evidence wasn't there."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Gen. Kerrick is a good man.
Edited on Sun Mar-28-04 12:55 AM by Octafish
So's that organization. They're going to be better than the GOP-houses of disinformation because Democrats actually do the whole think-tank thing because DEMs know what it's like to think.

EDIT: Tiipo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. another kick
for whatever reason :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptic9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nostamj, I Don't Think DU'ers May Realise What CAP IS!
But this website is an asset we should utilize.

Thanks for posting the link!

They have talking points on various subjects as well as daily talking points.

List of 'experts' including Eric Alterman.

Really hope that this gets more widely read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kimber Scott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-04 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeptic9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC