Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

9/11 transcript differs... which one is right?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 12:13 PM
Original message
9/11 transcript differs... which one is right?
Wash Post transcript here:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A20349-2004Mar24.html
says:
THOMPSON: Well, what it suggests to me is that there is one standard of candor and morality for White House special assistants and another standard of candor and morality for the rest of America.

CLARKE: I don't get that.

THOMPSON: I don't think it's a question of morality at all. I think it's a question of politics.

CLARKE: Well, I...

(APPLAUSE)

Fox says here:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,115045,00.html
Clarke responded: "I don't think it's a question of morality at all, I think it's a question of politics."

Slate also has Clarke saying the statement.

Anyone know? Who said it? Thompson or Clarke?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Clarke did ...
My, aren't we the devil's adovcate today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Killarney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Damn
I was hoping Fox was caught in a lie. I could have really used that today.

What are you talking about devil's advocate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robnycny Donating Member (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yep, Clarke said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. It was most definitely Clarke who said that...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wabeewoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Suggest you check out
Josh Marshall www.talkingpointsmemo.com for his excellent coverage of this. Faux took the quotes out of sequence and context and Clarke's response is to a totally different question. Ah, yes, fair and balanced. Why are you even reading them??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. from the NYT
THOMPSON: But you will admit that what you said in August of 2002 is inconsistent with what you say in your book?

CLARKE: No, I don't think it's inconsistent at all. I think, as I said in your last round of questioning, Governor, that it's really a matter here of emphasis and tone. I mean, what you're suggesting, perhaps, is that as special assistant to the president of the United States when asked to give a press backgrounder I should spend my time in that press backgrounder criticizing him. I think that's somewhat of an unrealistic thing to expect.

THOMPSON: Well, what it suggests to me is that there is one standard of candor and morality for White House special assistants and another standard of candor and morality for the rest of America.

CLARKE: I don't get that.

CLARKE: I don't think it's a question of morality at all. I think it's a question of politics.

THOMPSON: Well, I... (APPLAUSE)

THOMPSON: I'm not a Washington insider. I've never been a special assistant in the White House. I'm from the Midwest. So I think I'll leave it there.

KEAN: Congressman Roemer?

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/24/politics/24CND-PTEX.html?pagewanted=print&position=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC