Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I would recommend the same for single men in the Bush administration

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 01:37 PM
Original message
I would recommend the same for single men in the Bush administration
I'm from the Chris Rock school of thought. These are the most powerful people in the country - they need to get laid. And if they don't want to? Well anyone who considers it immoral even to masturbate shouldn't be holding public office. Am I the only one who notices how much more sickly than even the average Republican a single Republican looks? Man - Woman doesn't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like Bill Maher and Single Arab Men too
Many of the world's problems would go away if we didn't have so many sexually frustrated people. Give them a hand...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. um
Clinton's sex life was none of their business and their sex lives are none of our business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. just so you know...
posting this does not make the thread about Condi Rice one bit less sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. If I had made a generalized statement about women that would be sexist
Edited on Thu Mar-25-04 01:57 PM by jabuchan
I didn't.
Calling one woman a b*tch isn't derogatory to the entire gender. Saying one woman needs to get laid shouldn't be either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. calling a woman a bitch IS derogatory to the entire gender and SO IS
saying that a single professional woman should get laid in order to do her "job"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. you just said they couldn't get laid by women because they were married
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Huh?
I don't follow, but let me just say, I just get this sense - and how would you know I'm not absolutely right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. in the condi rice thread that was locked earlier--that's where you said it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I understand now
What I meant was that the married guys are probably already getting it and its doing no good. Either that or they are completely sexless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC