Karl Rove needs to get laid. BAD.

[mouse7]

Ever wonder how many lives would have been saved if Karl Rove had a remote chance in hell of ever getting laid? This faytbahstard
is intent on world domination because his has absolutely no sex appeal and a penis the size of an average brine shrimp.

What can be done to end this problem? Do we pitch in for cheap hooker for Karl? How about a blow up sex doll? A balloon can't run away from the bafoon's advances?

[madmax]

1. Ewwwwwwwwwwww

Who'd lay that POS.

[Warpy]

18. Here ya go

http;//www.muttonbone.com

[Jack_Dawson]

2. Rove is a Hottie!

I'm sure he gets hooch right and left.

:puke:

[NewJeffCT]

3. Maybe he can get a hotel room with Neil Bush?

That way, women can show up at the door, give them sex and then leave... after all, don't all Asian women do that?

[RandomKoolzip]

4. I think this is gonna get moved to the lounge, but...

Karl is exactly the kind of man ALL women find unattractive. He's a pig with the morals of a snake.

[kaitykaity]

5. Thanks, Mouse.

Great rejoinder on the Condi getting laid thread.

:thumbsup:

[qb]

6. I hear if the tip is good enough, Monica will deliver a pizza to him.

[VelmaD]

7. just so you know

Posting this thread doesn't make the one about Condi Rice any less sexist.

[Emboldened Chimp]

It's not sexist to say it about a guy

Yeah, it's a double standard, but it's true. When a guy says to a guy, "You need to get laid", it's a putdown. The only time a guy take offense to it is if its true.

[VelmaD]

28. That wasn't my point, but...

I think it is sexist too to say it about a guy. It implies that men think with their genitals which is an ugly stereotype.

And just so no one can accuse me of having a double-standard I alerted on this thread just like I did the one about Condi Rice. (whic was hard for me because I know Karl personally and hate his guts)

[Emboldened Chimp]

38. Believe me, it's not sexist to say it about a guy

Guys say this kind of thing to each other all the time. It's par for the course, actually. And like I said, we don't think of it as sexist, only a putdown. More than likely, we respond by saying, "Gee, you might be right."

[VelmaD]

43. Yes, but I think we both know...

that the guys on this board who don't "get it" about sexism are gonna use this thread to try to claim a double standard whether they were actually offended by the comment or not.

[Emboldened Chimp]

I understand your point

and you're right. It's happening on this thread already. But let them spew. They probably need to get laid anyway. ;)

[mouse7]

55. People who can't handle jokes with sexual content have issues

If someone can't handle threads with jokes with some sexual content, then they need to work out their personal issues with sexuality in counselling. The problem is personal in nature. The problem is not the thread content.

[VelmaD]

60. blah blah blah

Same sexist drivel. How many times do we women have to hear that it's not that men are sexist...we're just too sensitive or have issues or whatever other demeaning excuse it is you can come up with? :eyes:

[slinkerwink]

64. or stupid excuses like "oh, it was a joke, can't you LIGHTEN up?"

:nuke:

[Name removed]

81. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[VelmaD]

96. Yes, but you seem to be a really bad judge...

of who is and is not repressed. Let's be clear here...it was not Condi you originally accused of being repressed. It was me. Not a neo-con member of the administration. A fellow DUer.

I know for a fact you are wrong about me. You might well be wrong about her too - never know what's going on under the surface.

[mouse7]

106. No... the thread was about Rice, not you

Condi Rice is a repressed neo-con. She was the subject of the jokes about being repressed. You came onto the thread and started screaming at the people on the thread. Since you seem to be unable to understand satire when it contains sexual content, you made it clear you have issues regarding healthy sexual expression.

[Name removed]

97. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[VelmaD]

101. What makes your perception of the topic...

more valid than the perceptions of the women who found it offensive?

And btw, I would appreciate it if you would now stop calling me repressed given that you know nothing about me.

[slinkerwink]

103. trust me, she sure as hell ain't repressed, and neither am I

[Vladimir]

50. As a guy

I agree with you in practice and disagree in priciple. It is sexist, its just that most guys don't view it as such. Men are victims of stereotyping as much as women IMO, but the media does such a good job of teaching us that 'big boys don't cry' that we mostly keep our mouths shut about it.

V

PS of course I have made such jokes with my friends - I don't claim to be some paragon of virtue. I just think its a sad reflection on both myself and our society that us men accept subconciously that we are expected to think with our dicks.

[Emboldened Chimp]

65. I don't think it's so much of a media influence

as it is general upbringing. But I disagree on the principle issue. Personally, I don't mind that kind of joshing. In fact, it's fun. But that's just me. Sometimes it can be too much, but mostly I take part in putting my fellow brother down with gusto just like the next guy.

[Vladimir]

75. Fair enough

as I said, I ain't pretending my mates and I don't joke like that - thing is... I've been trying to pin down what disturbs me about this post, and I think its the fact that jokes like this don't belong in a public forum, which this board is. I wouldn't crack a comment like that in a room full of people who I mostly don't know.

we can agree to disagree on the priciple - differing views make life interesting.

V

[Emboldened Chimp]

86. That's a good point about this being 'public'

I hadn't thought of it that way. Hmm, there's something to that. It is a little different because we're not all facing each other, which gives us greater freedom to say what's really on our minds, for good or ill. In this case, more ill than good. But you're right. I don't think many people would make cracks about vibrators at a party. At least, I hope they wouldn't.

[bearfartinthewoods]

84. how about juvenile?

do i get to think it's silly and juvenile and a symptom of the downsizing of the average age of DU posters?

[Emboldened Chimp]

92. What do you mean, "do i get"?

Are you suggesting that you're not allowed to express your opinion on the subject? Just asking.

[Name removed]

45. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[rumguy]

48. watch out they'll try and get you deleted - nt

[VelmaD]

63. Oh no...I want this particular post to stay...

if only so I can send the link to my friends so they can get a huge laugh out of someone calling me repressed. *snort*

[VelmaD]

91. Dammit they deleted it

I was getting lots of milage out of someone calling me repressed. Pretty please mods...bring it back. :evilgrin:

[slinkerwink]

51. wtf? neo-con sexual repression? It's you, a LIBERAL, that is participating

in that by being blatantly misogynistic and sexist.

[mouse7]

No... it was a joke about puritanical repression...

...and what a mess being so puritanical makes one.

There's been plenty of similar threads about Jerry Falwell. However, becasue it's a puritanical WOMAN, you claim to have the right to put the subject out of bounds.

That's crud. People who are blatantly sexually repressed are reasonable tagets of satire, whether they are men or women.

[slinkerwink]

71. no, it was implying that she can't do the job without being fucked daily

[mouse7]

87. No it was implying puritanical sexual attitude affects one's job

People who are badly sexually repressed do screw up other parts of their life becasue of that behavior.

[slinkerwink]

93. no, it was implying that condi needs a COCK to be happy and to work better

[VelmaD]

54. You obviously have NO idea who you're talking to.

Go talk to some of the regulars in the Lounge about me before you go assuming I'm some kind of repressed neo-con. Hell, I'm the biggest flirt on the board and I am a big part of the reason Skinner banned sex threads (along with Magic Rat).

That original thread about Condi Rice may have been a joke but it was the kind of humor that has been used to belittle women for a long time.

[GOPisEvil]

83. You obviously don't know our Velma very well.

[mmm]

8. he needs a hooker with AIDS!

[SpaceCatMeetsMars]

9. Well now you're just getting ridiculous

Even a blow up doll isn't going to do it with that weirdo.

[Florida_Geek]

10. Rove could be gay

:evilgrin:

[bearfartinthewoods]

90. gee.....why did i know that this tack was coming

just more expression of the mindset, i guess.

[worldgonekrazy]

11. He does not deserve the pleasure of sex

Unless it involves a guy named "Bubba" and a prison shower setting.

(this is not a joke)

[bearfartinthewoods]

95. and gay rape folloows...a lovely day in freepland!

i say freepland to try and draw some slight difference between this place and freepville.

[yellowcanine]

12. Thanks a lot for that mind picture

just what I need to get me through the afternoon.

[Cocoa]

13. that's the only way Karl would get laid

Bad.

[dave29]

14. Know your enemy folks

Rove is married with kids.

[Emboldened Chimp]

16. Exactly why he's not getting laid!

:evilgrin:

[tigereye]

49. hey hey hey!

just cuz were married with kid(s) doesn't mean we aren't getting any!

wow how can that guy sleep at night!

[RummyTheDummy]

19. Yeah, so what's your point?

Because people never cheat on their wives and married people never get bored with their sex lives at home.

[dave29]

25. I was just pointing out

no one here seemed to know Rove was married and had children. He may be an evil bastard, but he probably still gets laid. Hell, Viagra is practically free for Government officials.

Getting sex doesn't necessarily make you stop being an evil bastard, although I agree, it can be a pleasant distraction. ;)

[Emboldened Chimp]

36. Look at Clinton

Was he an evil bastard? Of course not! Why? He was gettin' some!

[rumguy]

23. What does his wife look like? Anyone seen a pic? - nt

[Maat]

31. Well, I know he was ..

but I thought at least one wife left him.

[qanda]

15. If we *ever* want to be taken seriously

This thread should be moved to the Lounge.

[thebigidea]

22. taken seriously by whom?

[bearfartinthewoods]

98. by anyone above the age of 15 eom

[AlCzervik]

17. yuck!!

[bif]

20. Couldn't we all chip in and buy him a vibrator?

n/t

[truthspeaker]

21. this girl might do it

http://www.ilovekarlrove.com/

[asthmaticeog]

24. Careful

The mods just locked the "Does Condi Rice Need to Get Laid" thread. I'm watching the clock on this one. If it doesn't get locked, they should be made to answer for the double-standard.

[Emboldened Chimp]

29. It is a double standard, but the fact is

saying this about a guy, especially from a guy, is nothing more than a putdown. The only time a guy takes offense from this if it's true.

[rumguy]

26. Funny how the Condi thread got locked - evidently cuz it was "sexist"

[slinkerwink]

27. it WAS sexist!

I can't believe how you failed to see that.

[rumguy]

30. uh no it wasn't

[Vladimir]

32. Actually

I think it was flamingly sexist - the obvious implication was that a woman is useless and/or incapable of doing a good job unless she gets cock on a regular basis. That's sexist.

V

[Name removed]

35. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[kaitykaity]

39. It isn't polite to call people neurotic either.

:eyes:

[rumguy]

44. I can't believe you guys alerted on that post - sad

But it's true you are taking other people's words and assuming things about them based on your own preconceptions...it's stupid...

[slinkerwink]

56. that post definitely merited alerts!

and so does this one! making copycat threads of the condi rice thread trivializes women's concerns about blatant sexism and misogynism going on here.

[kaitykaity]

58. Digging the hole deeper.

Neurosis . . . stupid . . .

You do know, right, that Freud used the root word for the female organs to coin the word "hysteria" right? Please educate yourself about sexism before you lecture us about it, okay?

edit: Gawd I can't spell anymore. :shrug:

[noiretextatique]

61. that's just nonsense

the intent of words is a part of communication. that doesn't exist in a vacuum...it's a part of the culture we share. so...if your intent is not clear, it's your responsibility to explain it...and not just in your own mind, which no one can read. you should know that NOW.

[rumguy]

67. you can't hold everyone accountable to your "sensitivities" - nt

[slinkerwink]

70. *excuse* me.....it's not sensitivities----it's our gender that is being

attacked here....and DOZENS of women protested that thread, and this one too!

[rumguy]

79. let's mangle Bob Dylan while we're at it!!!! This is funny!

Education and social work are the fields in which the language police are busiest. My favourite example is from a new college textbook on human development that includes this statement: "As a folksinger once sang, how many roads must an individual walk down before you can call them an adult." This gruesome effort is some educator's attempt at a gender-neutral makeover to the classic folksong Blowin' in the Wind. In the original, it goes, "How many roads must a man walk down before you call him a man?"

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20040323.wxwente0323/BNStory/Front/

[slinkerwink]

80. so?

this isn't related to this thread.

[efhmc]

99. After reading this analogy, I can see that you really are not able to see

this issue for what it is. It is NOT about controlling thoughts or words, it is about respecting humans as people and individuals and not lumping them together because of race, sex or gender. The idea the Condi thread is based on is that a woman needs a penis (either on her or in her) to function in the workplace.

[rumguy]

102. you're missing the forest for the trees - nt

[noiretextatique]

72. why was your post in this thread deleted?

it had nothing to do with MY "sensitivities". i assume it violated the DU rules...as did that other IDIOTIC THREAD that spawned THIS IDIOTIC THREAD. and...you need to worry about your own "sensitivities," mr.

[Vladimir]

62. I absolutely was not

assuming anything. The implication was obvious.

V

[VelmaD]

33. Well since there were a number of women...

who disagreed with you you might wanta reconsider your credentials for deciding what is and is not sexist.

[efhmc]

52. It is nice that you have an opinion but how about showing us the reasons

you think that it was not sexist.

[rumguy]

59. the comment was directed at her humanity, not her sex

you read into others' words your own agendas

[slinkerwink]

66. it was DIRECTED at her sex!

I can't believe how blind you can be not to see that thread was absolutely sexist!

[rumguy]

69. I didn't take it like that - why is your impression of it automatically

superior to mine?

[VelmaD]

73. I'll flat out say it...

because you're a man. Because you have a vested interest in not seeing the sexism inherent in our society. It doesn't matter how progressive or enlightened you think you are...you still benefit from the patriarchy and are therefor not as inclined to see all the ways that men put women down every day.

[slinkerwink]

74. because DOZENS of women back me up!

so, when a large majority of the female gender protests a sexist thread, the LIKELIHOOD is that it IS a SEXIST thread!

[rumguy]

76. dozens speaking for millions - nt

[slinkerwink]

77. yes......women found that thread offensive, and this one too, because

it trivializes our concerns toward the condi rice thread.

[VelmaD]

78. Oh but it's ok for you to speak for millions...

and say it wasn't sexist.

Try again.

[noiretextatique]

82. what does her humanity have to do with "getting laid?"

can you explain that please?

[rumguy]

100. because sex is an important component to everyone's happiness - nt

[efhmc]

85. If you mean by an agenda that I will alway call sexism what it is when and

where I see it, then you are correct. However this thread was SEXISM at its worst. It is especially offensive to me on a forum that should be about respecting all people. Please refer to posts #60 and #65 and you will see that when "love" was brought into the picture, it made the thread a different matter to me but nowhere else was that mentioned. It was added much later.

[efhmc]

34. "Evidently?" What I really wonder is how any of this gets us where we

all want to be and that is with no bushies in the WH. Mean spirited and devisive nonsense does nothing to further that goal and seems pointless to me. I will, however, always speak out and try to educate those here on sexist issues and that thread was blantantly sexist.

[EV1Ltimm]

37. ...waiting for the "this is sexist" posts.

people were quick to defend condi... but what about poor karl?

i'd defend him myself, but i took an oath to never do such a thing.

[VelmaD]

40. I have already stated as much...

that I find this thread sexist and offensive. That I have alerted the mods on it. And I just posted about it in the Ask the Admins forum.

No double standard here.

[efhmc]

41. Mostly a stupid mirror image to see how we feminist would respond, but

also sexist.

[noiretextatique]

42. don't VANITY POSTS belong in THE LOUNGE? eom

[Zorra]

46. My friend "Delilah" might be convinced to go there if we could

pony up the cash. Could be really expensive though.

[Ravy]

47. Just wondering how you know the size of his penis?

Juvenile agruments deserve juvenile responses. I see you have gotten plenty.

[tom_paine]

53. Guys like Rove and Eichmann don't even want to get laid, I think

Their biggest hard-ons are Power and the Ruination of Enemies.

Nothing can get them more off than that.

[mobuto]

57. Karl Rove has a Wife - ewwwwww

Karl and Darby Rove
But which is which?

[historian]

68. let him have condi

they should fit together well

[Catherine Vincent]

88. How do you know how much sex he gets?

ARe you peeking in his bedroom?

[sendero]

89. The thing that all too often...

... get's people's dander and righteous indignation all fired up is the grain of truth in the joke.

And there is a grain of truth in *almost* every joke, that is an essential element to its humor.

Some folks have to find a cause in every comment made, and that get really tedious.

[madrchsod]

94. i hope all of you who disagree

about the comments about condi has e`mailed the creator of "boondocks" seems he was trying to find condi a man/husband a few weeks ago....

[rumguy]

104. yep - nt

[Moderator]

105. Locking

sexism is the same whether for Condeleeza Rice or Carl Rove.