Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

* going to increase # of troops in Afghanistan...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 05:14 PM
Original message
* going to increase # of troops in Afghanistan...
just reported on wolf-face blinker, sounds like they need to replenish the troops they diverted from the war on terror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, a day late and a dollar short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm still wondering how depleted out Nat'l Guard stateside level is
especially after Clarke mentioned yesterday that our rail lines and chemical plants are STILL not protected.

* seems to have been spreading the Guard around like they're bandaids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Troop Rotation"... from Iraq to Afghan?!
a little R&R in Kabul is just what the troops need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Sheesh, out of the frying pan and into the fire !!
n/t

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Send in the freepers!
I'm sure after all the macho-man, kill A-RABS, freepy talk in the past, they will have no problem enlisting and rotating out there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Since their site is down, that's the best use of Freepers possible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Didn't bush say Osama was irrelevent when he decided to take
a detour in his war on terror?

I seem to distinctly recall that Osama was not of any significance since the Taliban and AlQaeda had been smashed two years ago.

why the renewed interest? Is someone's approval ratings knocking on the cellar door?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC