Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Fineman just try to slime the 9-11 families? (on Hardball)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
berry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 07:13 PM
Original message
Did Fineman just try to slime the 9-11 families? (on Hardball)
I came in on the end of his remarks, but it sounded as if he was arguing that the 9-11 families are interested in getting the Commission to assign blame in order to get MONEY from the US government (as well as from the Saudis)!!

I was appalled! Tell me this isn't the newest talking point to discredit anyone who wants the truth to come out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jamesconway Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, I'm Sure it Is (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supormom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wouldn't put it past them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nlighten1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. If he said that...it just shows the desperation...
they are in big trouble...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. That's not the way I heard it.
He was pointing out that given the "revelations" the families could have a case against the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Ahh. That makes sense.
Just now Kristin Breitwiser(spelling) was on, being asked about the question of how the original reimbursements to the families was a way of preventing them from suing the government--but not because of the money. If they can't sue, they have no way to bring out the facts that could be discovered in the course of a trial. So they are dependent now on the 9-11 Commission to bring out the facts.

I do remember the issue of the recompense being linked to not suing, but I thought it meant they couldn't sue the airlines (??do I have that wrong?). I think the suit against the Saudis is probably also a method of getting more information/facts out in public.

Maybe I was too hasty--but I don't put it past the * crowd to even try to smear the 9-11 families. Not that it seems a smart thing to try, but they are looking desperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Right. I heard it that way. Howie stopped drinking bush ..
kool aid with the Iraq invasion. Now he's just a straight newsperson. Like he should have been all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Didn't most of the families..
sign away their rights to sue when they accepted money from the stettlement fund?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm not sure exactly what rights they had to sign away,
but yes, there was something like that. Suddenly I am very interested in how that was set up and who made the decision to set it up that way. It looks like a perfect ploy for gagging the people with the greatest interest in getting to the bottom of the tragedy. At the time, I thought it was all about being stingy and trying to save money. Now, I think it was CYA and closing down all access to info that they could think of....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Yes
and that's the point she made. The gov't bailout of the airlines, also prohibited the families from suing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Mrs. Mariani refused to sign and she is suing, if I'm not mistaken...
so it looks like individuals can still sue if they don't take the money. And Mrs. Mariani went ahead an did it.....the case is still active, but I don't know what stage it is in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-04 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. yes, that would be the whore Fineman testing a new talking point
out-f***ing-rageous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC