If Clarke is lying, why aren't the Clintonites calling him a perjurer?

[stopbush]

Yes, I know that Clarke's truths tend to show the Clinton Administration in a much better light than the bushies, but if Clarke was lying, why aren't Sandy Berger, Albright, Cohen and others distancing themselves from his testimony? After all, some of them were involved in the transition process and must know about these briefings that were given to - and ignored by - Condi and the other ghouls.

It seems to me that much of the testimony of Berger, Albright and Cohen corroborates Clarke's testimony. Will Frist call them up on perjury charges as well?

[grannyb]

1. They are

I heard they were asking for the release of some earlier testimony of his to look for perjury. You really didn't think the repugs would let that chance go by. The elves are working as I type.