Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harken v. Costa Rica

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 06:30 PM
Original message
Harken v. Costa Rica
Harken v. Costa Rica

<snip>

Nearly two years ago, Costa Rican nationals and admirers thought they'd been given reason to rest easy. In May 2002, responding to a large-scale mobilization of the country's environmentalists, President Abel Pacheco announced a moratorium on oil exploration and open-pit mining in Costa Rica. Legislators are currently working to give congressional backing to the executive order and repeal laws that expose the country to extractive industries.

<snip>

Harken Energy, a Texas-based oil company with close ties to U.S. President George W. Bush, had previously obtained rights to search for crude in Costa Rica. Before failing an environmental impact review in February 2002, it had planned to drill offshore. Now Harken is demanding that the Costa Rican government pay upwards of $12 million in reparations for its aborted exploits.

<snip>

But that's not the last word on the subject. Even as the company contemplates sending the case back into international courts, the Bush administration is brokering a treaty that threatens to make the Harken suit into something more than an obscure legal grudge match. That treaty is the Central American Free Trade Agreement

<snip>

In January of this year, former U.S. Sen. Robert Torricelli (D-N.J.) traveled to San Jose to negotiate on behalf of Harken. At the time, the Costa Rican government appeared grateful to be eliminating the specter of a costly international lawsuit. Environmental groups, however, greeted Torricelli with protests outside the Environment Ministry. They argued that the negotiations were a form of "oil extortion" – that Harken was punishing the country for enforcing its environmental laws.

<snip>

http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=18258



Probably no one will read this, that's what usually happens with news from outside the US, but in any case someone might be interested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Political_Junkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I for one pay attention
to any news of what's happening south of Texas, thanks for the info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidFL Donating Member (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-04 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. No, thank you for posting this...
I read every article posted on here on the Carribean and Central and South America (you could say I have a vested personal interest).

Besides the disturbing information about CAFTA, I think we should all be troubled by the fact that Bob Toricelli's name comes up as a shill for Harken. He's a member of Kerry's election campaign is he not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. yes...
I don't think he is in any key position, or even working fulltime. I think he only helped Kerry with fundraising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC