Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When even a Limited Hangout is much too much: BushCo and 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 08:47 PM
Original message
When even a Limited Hangout is much too much: BushCo and 9/11
This weeks developments saw sworn public testimony about many interesting topics. A few of the issues raised include:

Why wasn't NORAD scrambled to intercept on 9/11? If they were, who authorized it (hint, I bet it wasn't *Bush, which is a no-no)?

Who was running the Situation Room? Lynne Cheney????

Why was the Bin Laden family flown out on 9/12? Who authorized it?

What was in Bush's August 6th briefing?

What the hell did Bunnypants do on 9/11 and 9/12, anything? Was he "in the loop"?

Was Condi a deer in the headlights?

Did Powell have to beg the neocons not to invade Iraq on 9/11?

-------------------------------------

The specifics of LIHOP and BushCo come closer and closer to light.

I think we may have already seen it begun. I never thought these questions would go further than Michael Moore. There are no reasonable answers for any of these questions. None.

Come, throw some logs on the fire with me. Everybody needs the light.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm surprised we aren't hearing more about Lynne Cheney being there.
Can you IMAGINE how the freepers would be acting if something like this had happened under Clinton and Hillary had been anywhere in the same county?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Billary in the War Room would have driven them to swallow their tongues
to quote Joey Biden, "they would have ripped her skin off"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. I still can't get over Lynne in the Situation Room
if this gets in the press, people will really shake their heads and ask who is in charge here?

answer: not bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Shouldn't she be called to testify?


It seems to me Lynne should be called to testify before the comission if she was in the situation room when it all went down. I don't think she would be able to hide behind executive privelige.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. hey - you're right!
why hasn't she?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm with you. I never thought 9/11 would get this airing.
But the specific, troubling questions researchers have been compiling for years are still not being asked in a mainstream US forum, let alone being answered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. i think these questions alone will sink them, if answered
the simplest questions were always the meat of the issue. there has been much muddying of the water as far as 9/11 theories go, but these are the most salient questions.

if they ever broach the "simulation" cheney was running coincidentally on 9/11, we know MIHOP is breaking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Roger that, Minstrel Boy!
Troubling questions, indeed. Tonight on 60 Minutes, Ed Bradley let Condo Lizard Reissssssssss prattle on about "nothing could have been done."

He passed on a great opportunity to ask why military interceptors were not sent up immediately when those hijacked airliners went off course and did not respond to radio calls.

:freak:
dbt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. I thought Powell threw Wolfowitz overboard in his interview
He acknowledged that Wolfie was agitating for Iraq invasion on 9/12. He said it softly but he said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. good to hear that, i missed powell
that is what i read, but great for more conformation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Did the simulated crash exercise that was planned
for that morning affect the air traffic controllers or NORAD or any part of the national security apparatus in any detrimental way. Either by slowing down any response to an actual threat or hamstringing some agency's SOP. Minstrel Boy had a very interesting thread about this yesterday. Very interesting stuff!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. link to the "simulation" thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=1298401

So many honest questions - why aren't they being asked? Why is Zelikow not calling the witnesses and whistleblowers the 9/11 families have requested?

Rhetorical questions, obviously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. thank you
this is MIHOP waters...the deep end of the deep end

you rock, minstrel boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frank frankly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
11. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
15. And, why the unprecedented 1 month vacations?
Edited on Mon Mar-29-04 02:48 AM by Must_B_Free
For both Bush and Cheney? And why did neither return to stay in DC even after the 1 month vacation was over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC