Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could the Clarke issue be a cover for the * administration?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Jim Warren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:46 AM
Original message
Could the Clarke issue be a cover for the * administration?
I mean all the media frenzy brouhaha: questioning Clarke's credibility, Condi testifying, he said she said blahblahblah and in the meantime the 9/11 commissioners just throw in the towel and say case closed.

After all it was the * white house who themselves chose to delay and then release the book conveniently timed to align right at the crux of the investigation. Maybe this Clarke thing and media distraction for the bushies is a godsend that keeps the investigation out of specifics they care not be exposed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think it only open up more need for investigation
and something with teeth - like they did to clinton. We need subpeona power here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryYoungMan Donating Member (856 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. No.
How could this have been planned? That's like the twist ending of "No Way Out." It's dramatic but when you actually try to think through the story according to the new premise you realize it depends on an unreasonable number of coincidences and staged events. The "panic" in the White House is quite real, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. No.
This is not supreme cleverness. It's ineptitude. Learn to recognize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Warren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks, I generally do
Hmmm, though y'know, Clarke said himself today he wanted a christmas release. Why would the bushies put it off till now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Easy - it was the best of a bunch of bad options
The way I see it, they could delay publication until after the election and perhaps lose the election due to accusations of a cover up and censorship and with Clarke leaking teasers to the press over several months up to the election - a public relations nightmare.

Or they could black out sections and release it before xmas, which would be tantamount to an admission of guilt. Or they could get it out now, smear the messenger and later use the huge money chest to make people forget about it all nearer the election. 8 months is an eternity in politics.

So the way I see it, they took the best option they had but the spin isn't working, so they're panicking and working defense just to tread water.

http://brainbuttons.com/home.asp?stashid=13z
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Warren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. You make all good points.
Just that rereading the MTP transcript Clarke keeps trying to stay on topic and make the conversation about THE INVESTIGATION and of course timmy and ALL the media wants to make it a personal character issue about him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacifictiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. I don't think so
I think it is more a matter of karma calling - the chickens are beginning to come home to roost for these arrogant people who believe they have "god's blessing" for whatever they choose to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Not a chance. Imho, Clarke is worried about our nation and is trying to
prevent a future disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Warren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Right, I think so too
Not dissing Clarke here, rather that he is being used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC