Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

List of Republican Positive Achievements

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:57 AM
Original message
List of Republican Positive Achievements
I would like to build a list of possible positive achievements of the Republican Party. If there are some for the last 50 or so years please list them. I can not think of any, but that may be because of my limited political education.

My question is: "What has that party done for the American People?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Helped to maintain a strong military.
We may not like that we need one, but we do.

Also assisted the Democrats in "defeating Communism", though I am not sold on how necessary that really was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I don't buy that one
The Repubs always claim they have strengthened the military, but what the've really done is boosted the defense contractors. Not the same thing at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. You can't strenghten the military...
...w/o the DefCons getting richer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
25. But you CAN fatten the DefCons without helping the military
which is what has been going on.
All the supposed "defense" money under Regan, Bush I&II has gone into think tanks and contractors for designing new equipment. Meanwhile, our soldiers don't even have the reght equipment, half don't have body armor, their pay is cut and they are being required to stay in Iraq instead of being reinforced. This is not strengthening the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. They have better weapons.
They do have body armor, unfortunately is outdated. Clinton can accept as much blame for that as anyone. Pay hasn't been cut. Yes, they are required to stay in Iraq, but they are also getting replaced. Yes, they eventually are going back to Iraq. This would be because the size of the military was cut down by both Republicans and Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. No, it's not outdated
They just don't have it. It's a result of Rummy's lean and mean war on the cheap fantasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Funny.
It gets issued to you as a part of your gear. You turn it back in when you leave. As a supply officer I was required to make sure everyine had body armor in a good servicable condition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #34
59. No they don't seem to have it (U.S. troops buying own armor for Iraq duty)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #59
64. They are buying a better version.
Like I said, the stuff being issued isn't the best grade available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
strategery blunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #29
41. Wasn't family separation pay and imminent danger pay cut?
Just wondering
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. No, it wasn't cut.
There was a temporary increase added to it which was either removed or not renewed. It was then returned to it's previous levels. Still kind of a crappy thing to do, but...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Change to "maintain the WRONG military"
The GOP has maintained an imperial military and has continued the Pentagon's role of showering welfare onto arms manufacturers who are still churning out weaponry suited to winning a cold war turned hot.

We need a strong defensive military. We do not need to be in 70% of the worlds countries as an occupying force, going in to intimidate elected, reformist governments wherever they may arise. We do not need a military being used as mob enforcers for multinational corporations and oligarchies of the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Blah, blah, blah.
Democrats have had an even hand in placing us into those countires. C'mon...Republicans are not the only ones to blame for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. ABSOLUTE BULL
read the Congressional Record, not what republicans SAY they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Look at reality...
...and don't filter it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. READ THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD
and SEE who supports the military folk and who doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. *sigh*
Forget it. You don't wish to be rational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #26
40. LOL
FORGET IT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
strategery blunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
43. The Congressional Record can be edited too
If a politician said something for the media whores but meant something else, they can "edit" their comments with almost no one knowing, as very few people read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prodigal_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. I disagree
The military that * inherited from Clinton was able and efficient. The misAdministration has overextended personnel, provided inferior protection, relied upon unreliable informants (Chalabi) and consorted with corrupt contractors.

The military is so much weaker now under * that the government is now seriously considering reinstating the draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. And the one Clinton inherited from Regan/Bush was able and efficient.
Waht's your point?

The question is about Republicnas in general. Not Bush the lesser or even Republican Presidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. actually not true
Bush the First had just slashed the size of the military--iincluding enlisted pay--with no plan in place for restructuring it to meet the new needs of a post-COld War world.

the creation of a smaller, more mobile military was left to Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. Actually quite true.
I was a member of that military, as well as Clinton's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. LOL
Edited on Mon Mar-29-04 02:04 PM by Skittles
for the record, a great number of military people are horribly misinformed, trained like monkeys to believe everything repugs do and say is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Ohhh, nice slam on the military and every soldier that ever served.
Edited on Mon Mar-29-04 02:05 PM by DarkPhenyx
Way to go. Nice to know we are all stupid, club carrying cave men in your opinion, who are totally unenlightened and wholly w/o redeaming value. Sweet.

And we wonder why most service members vote Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. you are being utterly silly now
most service members vote repug BECAUSE they are misinformed. I know because I am a GI brat and a veteran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. You say they are misinformed.
They say they are better informed. You are a traitor to your uniform. They are true soldiers. Bottom line is it is your opinion. Nice fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. *sigh*
lost cause
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. I was thinking the same thing.
Too bad really. I don't generally give up on people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. I do
when they are lost causes. Republicans have always treated the military like second class citizens - right now they are getting SOLDIERS KILLED EVERY DAY while trying to reduce their benefits, all the while waving the war flag. *SICKENING*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. And Democrats never get soldiers killed for no good reason?
We have never treated out soldiers as second class citizens? Never spit on them? Never berated them for serving their country?

Please. You know better than that. Or I would at least hope you do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #57
61. SPITTING
Edited on Mon Mar-29-04 05:21 PM by Skittles
=PROPAGANDA BLOWN WAY OUT OF PROPORTION. Thank you for clarifying for me exactly where you are coming from; THIS is the last response you will EVER receive from me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. Slam Dunk
ASS not worth kicking, ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. BS.
Not even close. Avoidance of a subject and running off to pout is so not a slam dunk. It didn't even hit the rim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. It was a slam dunk in my eyes
and a touchdown,a wicked hard slapshot and a home run :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #69
73. running away, pouting, and refusing to respond to a question ...
is a victory? Wow! THe Bush Adminsitration is winning then. That's all they seem to be doing too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #73
79. Who died
and appointed you ref? Do I need to KICK YOUR ASS??? :-) Skittles TM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #79
82. Na, no need.
I am so not in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #53
62. WOW...What a thing to say
Especially to a vet. Who the hell do you think you are!? A traitor because he doesn't agree with you opinion? WTF?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #62
66. You misread it.
There are some in uniform who would say that her having the opinion that she does makes her a traitor to the uniform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. Misread it?
You are a traitor to your uniform.

:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. please re-read the entire exchange.
you are missing the qualifiers about it being a point of view from others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #66
72. Whatever
Edited on Mon Mar-29-04 06:17 PM by stepnw1f
You are transparent and now on ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #72
74. Yippie! I'm on someones ignore!
*puts another one in the win column*

Now I can crack open a beer and celebrate.

Go Me!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
75. Bush Sr. oversaw the biggest military drawdown in US history
Part of trying to paper over the disaster-in-the-making that the doddering California pretender created by bankrupting the nation trying to create a bloated state-of-the-art navy.

Eisenhower warned the world about the military-industrial(-Congressional) Complex, because the Republicans in the 1950s had invented the phenomenon of "cost creep" whereby whatever was bid by military contractors would cost whatever money Congress had authorized for the system.

So, Republicans going backwards:

Bush, Jr. is a sociopath bent on world domination. Um, not good for military morale or strength.

Bush, Sr. tried to save the nation from Reagan's excess, and created a huge drawdown.

Nixon humiliated the military by subsuming it under the CIA and Kissinger and their plan to destroy Laos and Cambodia.

Eisenhower warned us the Cold War Republicans were setting up a rigged system to loot the nation using the Cold War as an excuse to funnel unchecked sums to military contractors.

Hoover was a loser.

Lincoln killed more military than any Commander-in-Chief in United States history.

Republicans royally SUCK at creating, maintaining, or building a military. All they do is PROJECT military superiority.

Here's the appropriate analogy for Republicans and the military:

Republicans are to the military as Codpiece is to Bush the Fake Airman - hollow, pretend, and all-promise-no-delivery.

Dan Brown
Saint Paul, Minnesota
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
78. LMAO - they waste money on corporate enrichment projects
Edited on Mon Mar-29-04 06:48 PM by gsh999
like Star Wars which doesn't do a damn thing for national defense. And yes, I was in Reagan and Clinton's military. The repugs enrich the military industrial corporations, which does not translate into a better or more efficient military. I was in the infantry, and we didn't get squat under Reagan. Under Clinton, we got new radios, vehicles, machineguns, mortars, and boots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's made them more cynical, selfish and greedy
That's about it.
Oh, and racist too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hummm


Nothing comes to mind.

Well,maybe I can say that Republicans have caused us to examine our core beliefs and determine what true JUSTICE is really about..they do keep us on our toes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. The only things I can think of...
Coughing up phlegm as I type this...
Nixon (must have been that Quaker background) recognized the sovereign rights of Native Americans, and he began to normalize relations with China.

I never thought I would cite Nixon as a shining example of US presidential policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Only thing Nixon did wrong was...
...get caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. The only thing?
So breach of faith with the Constitution wasn't wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. No, not that it wasn't wrong.
Just not unique. The only difference between Dick and the others is that he got caught at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
30. Nixon was a mixed bag
He signed the EPA into law.

He started the war on drugs, but had rehab, not interdiction and punishment, as its cornerstone.

He was elected on a "secret plan to end the war." While he reduced the number of US troops in Vietnam, he allowed the war itself to drag on. Reducing the number of troops may or may not have saved any lives, leaving fewer to do the same job, as well as fewer to get shot doing it.

Nixon was, IMO, the last GOP president to care more about the country than rich and corporate cronies, although gawd knows he had them.

It's sad to be nostalgic for Nixon, who did a few things for us as well as many things to us. His successors have only accomplished the latter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Lincoln Freed The Slaves
Let's set the wayback machine to the 1860s, Sherman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Ony in the last 50 years
Partys were a lot different then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gildor Inglorion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Sherman refusing to run for President WAS positive
What he did before that was unspeakable barbarism at its worst. I'm a Georgian and a proud liberal Democrat, but nothing will ever convince me that Sherman was anything other than a monster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #17
33. Sherman....as in Peabody's pet boy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dwckabal Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
60. While Sherman probably went too far in Atlanta
but it is well known that Confederate troops set fire to munitions plants and factories in Savannah and Columbia during their retreat to deprive the Union Army of those supplies (good example: Richmond).

Lots of apocryphal stories have arisen about Sherman, and he unfairly takes the blame for almost all of the destruction of the South.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Let's try and give an honest look at this ok?
Letting your bigotry and bias talk for you only proves that you are bigoted and biased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
77. You want a list of GOP's positive public achievements?
Well chew on this: they are positively crooked, positively repulsive, positively avaricious, postively heartless, positively without morals, positively disgusting, positively selfish, positively without redeeming qualities, and positively ludicrous.

Sign me "bigoted and biased" against every rat's ass republican in this country. Everytime I see or hear one spout off, I want to slap him silly.

YOU GOT THAT? I HATE Republicans!!!

And people like me? We even have a themesong!

http://www.ericblumrich.com/ihr.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Eisenhower & the Interstate Highway System
Easily moving goods & people all over the country did wonders for the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. and he tried to warn us

about the military-industrial complex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
68. Yes, he CERTAINLY DID.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
36. True, but not really the intent
The National Defense Highway System was based on the German Autobahn system.

From globalsecurity.org:

"When President Eisenhower went to Kansas to announce the interstate highway system, he announced it as "the National Defense Highway System." In 1956 President Eisenhower signed legislation establishing the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways (about 41,000 miles of roads). Since then, DOD has continued to identify and update defense-important highway routes. The National Defense Highway system was designed to move military equipment and personnel efficiently."

Moving people and goods was a byproduct of the initiative, but the intent was military mobility during the Cold War.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. the military use was certainly key in selling it
However, its peaceful uses were well known and anticipated as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gildor Inglorion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. Nixon/Kissinger China policy
An incredible, almost unimaginable breakthrough at the time. Maybe it was cynical politics, but it did have a positive outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
49. I'm not sure it is a positive thing to deal with tyrants like Mao.
On the other hand, Nixon had no trouble supporting a half dozen dictators in Latin America and elsewhere so its not surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
20. depends on who you are asking
Edited on Mon Mar-29-04 12:13 PM by tandot
If you ask Ann Coulter, she might come up with several hundreds "positive" achievements. The same for filthy rich people and greedy companies, or religious fanatics.

I can't think of anything that I would consider positive, but then, I might be very biased and not the most politically educated person here.

(edited to add comment)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
22. Interstate highway
It would've been born much later without Eisenhower's relentless advocacy. A wondrous achievement, a testament to the man, a Republican at the time, not to the squalid nest of malcontents his party has become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcd1982 Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
24. wasn't...
the Clean Air Act and the like signed by President Nixon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roaming Donating Member (476 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
28. We had some really good econonic times under Reagan... also
Cold War over / Berlin wall down...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. Excuse me?
Try the following article on for size...

Give Ronald Reagan Credit for Ending the Cold War? What Cold War?
The myth the Politicians Manufactured

Robert Whealey

http://www.tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/2605

The Real Reagan Legacy
Debunking Myths About Reagan
by Mike Hersh

http://www.americanpolitics.com/20020319Hersh.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #35
51. Good post. Reagan was an awful president.
RW media has convinced Americans that he was some kind of hero. The facts prove otherwise. A very corrupt administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
37. Our national parks system...
was originated by Teddy R. and Nixon was surprisingly strong on many environmental issues.

I'll think of some more. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
45. Dupe? Shouldn't this discussion be continued here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i_c_a_White_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Damn! I can't think of a thing they have have done
must be something...i dunno...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #45
81. Aw crap. Nobody got my funny.
Guess next time I can't be so subtle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
50. Eisenhower's appointments of Brennan and Warren.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
58. Eisenhower - highways
Nixon - relations with China (which may come back to bite us in the ass)

Teddy Roosevelt - National Parks

John McCain - campaign finance reform

The more recent Republican presidents have been ass clowns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MAlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #58
63. ass clowns?
or do we just not have perspective that we have with the older ones? i believe some things might mesh out as ok that we now oppose...but, i think almost all of what the rethug party says now is wrong, so im gonna fight 'em...i dont have the audacity to believe im always right tho
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
76. Here's what they've done for the American People:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
80. Do you know what's sad
Edited on Mon Mar-29-04 07:06 PM by Sanity
On this thread people can come up with so many responses, yet on the Democratic thread, it just turned into a flamefest of how conservative the Democratic presidents were.

C'mon guys, we need to get it together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
83. They've made European people more aware of US politics
We're watching more closely than ever. That'll be good for the USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC