CONdi Rice

[deacon]

Rice's continued refusal to testify before the 911 commission is further proof that she is hiding something and NOT something small. The vicious attacks on Clarke indicate they are hiding something HUGE.

It's an outrage that this administration continues to stonewall this vital investigation. THEY should be the ones pushing to get to the truth instead of obstructing the pursuit of the ways and means of making our country safer. This coming from an administration claiming to have national security as their #1 issue. It's immoral and a disgrace.

It's isn't difficult to believe Clarke's accounts as accurate anymore as the administration is implying, via their response to Clake's testimony, that national security and terrorism was not a "high priority"-- because it appears it is not even important to them now by the way they are handling this.

[calimary]

1. Sure smells, doesn't it? Contradicta Rice.

Or, as you say, deacon, CONdi - she's a CONwoman, alright.

[H2O Man]

2. It's funny....

there are four choices:1- an innocent person acting innocent;2- an innocent person acting guilty; 3-a guilty person acting innocent; and 4- a guilty person acting guilty. Now, by any objective standard, a political leader refusing to testify under oath appears to be acting guilty. That leaves 2 & 4 as the choices. I suspect that anyone who was not able to express the truth when they have nothing to hide would not make it far in any administration. I think that the administration knows the commission would expose things larger than we might expect were Condi to testify under oath in a public forum.

[LadeJarl]

3. The question is

if Sleeza Rice is part of the "inner circle"? Is she privy to all the information even as a NSA? I'm not that familiar with the inner workings of the WH et al, so please excuse me if it was an ignorant question.

Erik

[damnraddem]

4. Hey, they may be TRYIING to hide something, but they're not really.

It's as many of us have long said -- at best, the Bushistas were asleep at the switch, leaving the U.S. open to 9/11. They'd been warned, and they had been given a plan by the outgoing Clinton Administration. They didn't have to follow that plan, just look at it and then draft one of their own. Instead, they LOWERED the guard.

[boobooday]

5. Condi Quote

``I think the American people do not believe that the president of the United States is pursuing a folly in the war on terror,''

Do not believe??? She didn't say he wasn't pursuing a folly, she was gloating about how their propoganda has had the desired effect.

http://www.wgoeshome.com