I could not believe this column, even from a leaping warmongering gnome like Friedman:
I have a confession to make: I am the foreign affairs columnist for The New York Times and I didn't listen to one second of the 9/11 hearings and I didn't read one story in the paper about them. Not one second. Not one story.
Lord knows, it's not out of indifference to 9/11. It's because I made up my mind about that event a long time ago: It was not a failure of intelligence, it was a failure of imagination. We could have had perfect intelligence on all the key pieces of 9/11, but the fact is we lacked — for the very best of reasons — people with evil enough imaginations to put those pieces together and realize that 19 young men were going to hijack four airplanes for suicide attacks against our national symbols and kill as many innocent civilians as they could, for no stated reason at all.
snip
I want to wake up and read that Dick Cheney has apologized to the U.N. and all our allies for being wrong about W.M.D. in Iraq, but then appealed to our allies to join with the U.S. in an even more important project — helping Iraqis build some kind of democratic framework. I want to wake up and read that Tom DeLay called for a tax hike on the rich in order to save Social Security and Medicare for the next generation and to finance all our underfunded education programs.http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/28/opinion/28FRIE.html?8hpibSo this super-hawk, who pushed like mad for the invasion of Iraq now wants Cheney to clean up the "reasons" for the invasion, to make it all nice-poo?
And this dimwitted "reporter/journalist" hack hasn't watched a nano-second of Clarke's testimony??????? Jeezus, how do these dimwitted fuckwads get away with collecting a paycheck for this drivel?