Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who has a credibility problem?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 07:04 AM
Original message
Who has a credibility problem?
I am so sick and tired of hearing the pundits and Bu$h apologists repeatedly saying that Clarke has a credibility problem. Even worse is the meme that he was grandstanding when he opened his testimony with an apology to the 911 families.

The problem is that these memes are being repeated over and over, so that now general population is convinced that Clarke is a liar who is only out to make money selling his book.

In the meantime Condi Rice, {whoever thought that they would fly airplanes into buildings) is getting a free pass again. The press is bending over backwards to support her lame excuses not to testify under oath or publicly. Whose the one with the credibility problem?


BTW, Condi why did you say you thought that 911 would have been traditional hijackings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Check out today's NY Times
The news story called "911 Panel Wants Rice to Testify Under Oath"
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/30/politics/30PANE.html?pagewanted=2&th

Here's a couple paragraphs:
Members of the commission, Democrats and Republicans alike, say they are angered by her interviews. They say the White House has made a major political blunder by continuing to assert executive privilege in blocking public testimony by Ms. Rice while continuing to use her as the principal public spokeswoman in defending the Bush's administration's actions before Sept. 11.

"I find it reprehensible that the White House is making her the fall guy for this legalistic position," said John F. Lehman, Navy secretary in the Reagan administration and a Republican member of the commission. "I've published two books on executive privilege, and I know that executive privilege has to bend to reality."


This story isn't going away. There's lots more to be said, and the more Bush's hacks scream, the less credible they become.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. If you read the papers
you are more likely to know whats going on, but I am referring to the vast majority of Americans who don't follow this stuff and only hear the sound bites. In almost every broadcast that I have heard in the last week, some talking head is making a rude comment about Clarke's credibility and it is allowed to pass unchallenged. The negative comments are all the vast majority of Americans ever get to hear. The rest gets lost in the noise.

I guess what's getting my goat, is to hear this Clarke bashing crap on NPR this morning and it was the same exact crap that I heard on FOX and MSNBC last night. It's all about assassinating Clark's character while Condi is allowed to hide behind executive privilege and as much as possible gets a free pass. If anyone should be getting the 5th degree by the press it is Ms. Rice. She is the one who is most responsible for ignoring all of the warnings about 911 because she didn't have a clue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gildor Inglorion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm listening to NPR but all I'm hearing is fund-raising blather
and short headlines from Karl Kassel. Now they're doing a puff piece on *'s traveling to Wisconsin to boast about job loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. The worm turns slowly - Remember Watergate?
Public opinion is about 50% right now. All the GOP poll tinkering will make it look like junior is slightly ahead. 'Tis a matter of time before most journalist will realize and understand the whole picture. When that happens I predict 65% in favor of Richard A. Clarke with junior going down in the 30% bracket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC