Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This Rice deal was a setup to protect Shrub from testifying.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
doubles Donating Member (357 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 06:46 PM
Original message
This Rice deal was a setup to protect Shrub from testifying.....
Edited on Tue Mar-30-04 06:59 PM by doubles
They played their cards well, and we were bamboozled into believing they would hold out on Rice testifying. Folks, the Republicans are thinking long term, they are strategizing their every move, predicting media and public reaction, then planning a follow up. We are being beaten at their game, Big Dog was the only cat able to outwit them. I firmly believe that having Condi testify now protects Bush. I can hear Hannity now, "they made all this fuss, all this noise about Condi testifying, we gave them Condi, now they want Bush, how ridiculous are these Democrats?" Condi can handle herself, and is smart enough to come out smelling like a rose. Bush on the other hand would have melted. I guarantee you, if the situation were reversed, Repugs would have demanded that Clinton testify from the beginning, the way they embarrassed him in their 60 million dollar blow job investigation, which was nothing less than a political lynching.

If we were smart, we would have been requesting Bush to testify from the beginning!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. they can't make a deal like that
it's gotta be illegal. if somebody has information valueable to the investigation, they should be subpoenaed. If they wish to invoke executive privlidge, they can go through the channels like Clinton had to do.

Anything else is obstruction of justice. And if the commissioners agreed to this crap deal and choose to honor it, then they are obstructing justice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitsune Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
24. The committee can't subpoena.
B*sh made sure of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wolfie boy was on this afternoon with
Drier and he said to him: for some of course this isn't enough now they want The President to testify too. Not a direct quote, sorry my head was exploding. Oh what they would have done to Clinton by now. Notice how no one calls the Bush* a liar too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Night Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Bingo!
The Bush plan: Fatigue the easily fatigued media and public with Condi's refusal to testify so that calls for Smirk and Dick to testify will be viewed as whining.

By the way, nice handle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yawn...
This is only the opening minutes of "the game."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well they anted up. Raised.
Now it is time to call their bet and see the cards. You have decided they aren't bluffing. I think they are. Rice will have to contradict herself and the rest of them many times before she is done. She knows them well enough that she knows the knife goes in her first if things go wrong. She may just resign and go run for Congress.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BabsSong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Middlemen--pin in your bubble. The press conference today
by the commission heads admitted that they have NO transcript of Condi's previous testimony before them..just notes. Un-fucking beleivable. There is no one making a transcription of these testimonies. How strange is that and how convenient???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisel Donating Member (217 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. They will never get Bush under oath anyway.
Even if Tenet testified that he told Bush directly that the planes were going to crash into the WTC on 9/11, there is still no way Bush would testify under oath before the commission.

If Bush wasn't being hurt by Clarke, he would shrug it off.Instead he is trying to defend himself. Now he is going to try to turn a negative into a postive by have Condolezza Rice testify and wow everybody. Maybe she will, maybe she won't.

Remember Bush is playing to 2 audiences-the insiders who probably think he is guilty but are afraid to go against the "king" if the public backs the king; and the outsiders (general public).

It is the insiders who will bring Bush down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
27. The only way
Is to ask the hard questions! We cannot allow Condi to weasel her way out of this interview! If the commission is smart, they'll send her off a gibbering wreck! The 'pukes think they've got us by allowing Condi to testify, so we have to turn the tide on them by grilling her until she's well-done! We CANNOT ALLOW THIS OPPORTUNITY TO SLIP AWAY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarchy1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bingo! Job Well Done!
Nail on the head!

Divide & Conquer!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's too early......but it looks like a win for the citizens.
Edited on Tue Mar-30-04 07:02 PM by higher class
We won the first round....

She HAS TO testify under oath in public.....

this means everyone involved in Washington or around the world
will hear her and be able to pick up on 'contradictions'

she doesn't lie well as everyone talks about and having to struggle to tell the truth and sound pure is hard work.

if the Commission is doing their job, they will pick up on all
the 'contradictions' and fuzzy statements she makes in that
hearing and in her private hearing and her many, many TV
appearances - and they will ask her if she can come back,
if necessary.

This was also a win in that THE REGIME FLIP-FLOPPED BIG TIME!

They flip-flopped on Rice
They flip-flopped on Bush and Cheney and the time
they would permit before the Commission.

The right wing propaganda and guest propagandists will play it up as sincere cooperation, but don't you believe it - THEY HAD TO DO IT.

If you know how hard they'll have to work to figure out how to not lie and do a cya at the same time - it means - THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WON!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisel Donating Member (217 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. They were never going to get Bush to testify under oath anyway.
Even if Tenet testified that he told Bush directly that the planes were going to crash into the WTC on 9/11, there is still no way Bush would testify under oath before the commission.

If Bush wasn't being hurt by Clarke, he would shrug it off.Instead he is trying to defend himself. Now he is going to try to turn a negative into a postive by have Condolezza Rice testify and wow everybody. Maybe she will, maybe she won't.

Remember Bush is playing to 2 audiences-the insiders who probably think he is guilty but are afraid to go against the "king" if the public backs the king; and the outsiders (general public).

It is the insiders who will bring Bush down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. If Condi doesn't answer openly and honestly
then there will be more public outcry and that's when the finer details of the RAW deal will come out. Just the fact that everyone keeps saying Bush won't testify under oath and behind closed doors still leaves a bad taste in swing voters mouth....they are stupid enough to sway one way or the other from unchecked commercials, they can do the simple math that Bush won't swear on his little precious bible, and he'll only talk behind the iron curtain...hehe...no matter how you sum it up...Bush still looks like they are hiding something. And we know what it is...the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BabsSong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bingo--you win the cigar. Did it take us this long to figure it out!!
Great lawyer moves. They played the Rice card until they got the compromise of having all commissioners present for Bush's testimony BUT that testimony with Cheney sitting right next to him to mop up his pee. And the agreement that NO ONE else in the administration will be called to testify. That means other people who have not yet appeared have info. I wonder if it also includes former WH staff???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. But can they be called to testify in private?
Just wondered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. is this correct? only audio, NOT on TV? read this on DU
if so, how incredibly bizarre!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. CNN will get their cut
Don't worry, CNN will televise it, they'll have a 5 second delay so they can rewrite history and reword the truth. But it'll still be televised.

The word of the day is Propaganda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doubleyoi Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. Condidiot
Sorry, but she cannot lie her way out of a paper bag. I think she was, as mostly an academic, completely out of her league (lyingwise) when she signed up with this crowd. They lie so often and so convincingly that they raised the bar too high for our little Condi. She'll be unable to speak for more than a minute without contradicting herself. She will be the sacrificial WH lamb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Your post expresses my sentiments precisely.
And Condi doesn't realize she's been tagged. She's toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Noone knows what's going to happen
in all honesty.

Certainly not the Freepers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doubles Donating Member (357 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Disagree, she will survive the process successfully.... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
20. ADD: No Rove, no Wolfy & giving credibility to the 9/11 commission.
Sure Bush does not want to testify. But, what goes unsaid is that the 9/11 commission itself is a sham set up by Bush administration people. And, going unsaid gives the commission tacit approval, unquestioned approval.

The press is not even noting that this stops this dubious commission from calling other members of the 9/11 LIHOP team. We already know Bush is not the brains behind this bunch, and so now the brains cannot be questioned about the deaths of 3,000 and the subsequent deaths of thousands and thousands more.

Bush's reign is starting to stink worse and worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. But the 9/11 Families will determine the outcome
WE know the truth will not come out of this panel because of the stonewalling this administration continues to do, however, hopefully the families will be relentless in finding the truth and they will not settle for behind the scenes explanations. Remember too, Bush never visited one funeral, now he won't show his face to the families of 9/11 victims? Plus he wants to make a mockery of the WMD and America? I just don't see this as a win for Bush.
Condi is smart, she's just thinking, "I can't wait to get the hell out of here."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
21. Check:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davekriss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
23. "The Rice deal was setup to protect Shrub..."
Absolutely agree. This is an exercise in the art of the "limited hang". A pre-emptive strike and the growing brush fire.

Absolutely Bush and Cheney should be forced to testify under oath and in public. They need to recount and account for their actions/in-actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
25. the Big Dog will outwit them at their own game...
just wait and see...


We got Condi to testify. Then we will up the ante. First, publicize the "deal" that Bush and Cheney don't have to testify. Doesn't play well in Peoria. Then have the Big Dog and Al Gore testify in public and under oath. Public pressure will force them to break the deal and testify. No special treatment for Bush. Watch and see.

The Big Dog has already let out a teaser. During his little coffee with Bush (remember the photo of Clinton perfectly at ease and Bush sitting rigid), Clinton said that he told Bush that the five major foreign policy challenges included: Israel/Palestinian, North Korea, Al Qaeda and terrorism, and Iraq (I forget the other issue). He said Bush answered that he'd move Iraq to the top of the list.

I'm sure there's more to come. And it will come out before November.

Drip, drip, drip....Patience, my pretties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
26. Absolutely
We were tricked. We should have realized that the spin doctors were holding out as long as they could to come up with appropriate crap for Condi to shovel in her testimony. I fear the hard questions will not be asked, rather, she'll just be lobbed softballs that are tailor-made for Karl Rove's brand of spin.

We were fooled, I think, and we will pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanstaafl Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
28. Disagree ... It was set up to keep Ashcroft from testifying
His actions actual show the administration knew something relating to airplanes and hijacking was going to happen. Could be wrong, but I think this is more likely due to his change from commercial flights to private/government flights back in July of 2001.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 14th 2025, 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC