Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Richard Clarke on Jon Stewart tonight - Comedy Central

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:38 PM
Original message
Richard Clarke on Jon Stewart tonight - Comedy Central
Don't miss it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtf Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the reminder!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libbygurl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you for the reminder! VCR on overtime this past week!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rick Myers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Roger that...
Can't wait... Thanks for the head-up!!!

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtf Donating Member (273 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. two minutes..
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. no, he cancelled
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anti_shrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. no, Jon was joking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. he didn't sound like he was joking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:22 PM
Original message
clarke's on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. thanks, Jerry
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
40. Your welcome young lady!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. LOL! Did everyone get that spammer's email address?
I wrote it down, in case you didn't...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I sure did!
Pretty dumb of him to do that, right? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. scottrichter422@yahoo.com
That was funny. I think I will send him a message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. don't
he'll retaliate like only a spammer can
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I used my garbage address.
I have used it for serious mail like once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Man...don't send that guy anything with your
good email address....you'll never see the end of the spam. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. so what happened in the first segment?
just saw the tail end of Rob Corrdry punkin' some lame-o.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. Clarke has mentioned the Bush admin being obsessed with Star Wars twice
He wants that in the discussion, I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. he also mentioned the Bush administration having the book sinct Oct
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poor Richard Donating Member (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. And he took out everything the WH wanted him to
he said that some good stuff got taken out because it was secret/top secret
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. I beleive it
they truly are an incredible bunch of buffoons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Interesting point slinkerwink. I think that needs to be pointed out more
often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. Jon takes another Jab at FOX
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poor Richard Donating Member (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Clarke just put it out there
Bush*'s foray into Iraq hurt the war on terror
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
23. Interestingly awkward tensions
Edited on Tue Mar-30-04 11:25 PM by DrBB
Stewart seems a bit at a loss as to how to handle this. He's doing the usual wisecracking bit, trying to walk that line between the seriousness of the topic and the comic nature of the show. But the jokey bits are falling rather flat. Clarke doing his talking points, not really responding to the banter.

Commercial break over. Talking about character assassination. Seems more comfortable.

"I'm not running for president. My character not at issue. question is, why are we attacking Iraq when it hurts the war on terrorism."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. that's because Clarke isn't your typical talk show guest, and humor
really can't address the importance of what Clarke is saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. In the book, Clark is a bit funnier...
...but also a bit earthier....termerity and balls.......I think Clark is being professional, but in real life would be earthier....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. It was much looser after the break
Interesting the way Clarke described that horde of people in the West Wing paid by tax dollars writing up talking points, calling up conservative talk show hosts, etc... Sounds like he was disgusted with the political nature of the Bush administration (and we've heard this about them before from insiders...many times).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. most telling exchange:
"I want to thank you, Jon, for helping highlight the issue," as they close

so, does this mean that he has gotten SQUAT from other media outlets?

am I reading too much into this?

I don't think so

could there be a more CUTTING indictment of the pathetic state we've reached, when a COMEDY show is the ONLY source of HONEST reporting that exists???????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. *sigh* I'm just glad we have Stewart
and I want an hour format, dammit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Audience reaction...
...seems pretty heavy applause and cheers....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. Jon should avoid small planes
and totally have an hour-long show. There was talk of doing the Colbert Report as a separate show but I think it got axed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
43. Yes, in fact I hoping Jon would catch a dummy
I wanted to hear more of what Clarke had to say. Jon was very uncomfortable I thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
26. Clarke says it's interesting how right-wing talk radio hosts...
...are all saying the same thing on this matter. Didn't mince words. They got their talking points from the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
37. I made that observation a few days ago
I listen to Boortz in the morning, Schnitt mid afternoon, and Hannity in the evening.

These sessions take place during my ride to work, my lunch hour pickup, and my ride home in the evening.

I don't have these shows on entirely during these times.

And in the short span that I listen in, I constantly hear the same points made over and over and over about the exact same issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Nice to hear that observation on national TV.
Especially on a show more popular than Faux.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harrumph Donating Member (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #37
48. CatWoman....
Edited on Tue Mar-30-04 11:52 PM by Demo_god
Your lunch hour pickup? Is that like a nooner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #48
52. ROFL!!!
I WISH!!!

no, I am friends with one of the guards in the building. He gets a very short lunch hour. So most days I pick up lunch for both of us.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
29. He done good!
again!!!!

I hope he reads DU. He probably needs a bit of support these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
32. We need good people in government
I was very familiar with Clarke before this crap came up because of he is the counter-terrorism czar and specifically the cyberterrorism czar. We learned about him at RIT.

If we want good people in government, then good people need to work for government. Who wants to replace guys like Clarke? I doubt many aspire for that because of all the bullshit that comes with it. These guys are heroes just like the soldiers and firefighters and so on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. this is right in his bio in the Boston Globe.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #36
53. Thanks for the link it was a good one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. Exactly.
Sadly, politics is about making a quick buck now. It's corporate insiders and businessmen who want in these days. Short term.

That's why Bush got into this "racket".

Worthy career public servants are becoming rare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
34. I *love* that man!
A true hero. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
35. You missed the big one: Clinton pushed the attention to al-qaeda
When asked if he had focused Clinton's attention on bin Laden and al-qaeda Clark said it was the other way around and that Clinton was the one who pushed the issue of terrorism and al-qaeda. I hope there is a transcript to confirm. The Freepers must be messing in their pants over that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #35
44. I heard that too!
That is another reason why the bushies are foaming at the mouth at Clarke. It's because he highlights Clinton too much and doesn't highlight dumbass enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #35
45. YES. I caught that too.
...Wish Stewart had dropped the jokes and followed up on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #35
47. Captured that one on video
I snipped that exchange out, and crunched it down.

Here:
http://piratevideo.tv/MOV/ClarkeOnClinton.mov

QuickTime, 21 seconds, 261K

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nlighten1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #47
58. Do you have the rest of it?
I missed it but I want to see the whole conversation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
41. I wish Stewart would shut up and let him talk.
He keeps cutting him off with stupid jokes, for once he should drop the schtick and be a bit serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeanutOne Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #41
54. Maybe he'll redeem himself with Karen Hughes tomorrow
...but I'm not holding my breath. Stewart generally gives the right wingers a pretty easy time. I didn't watch the show for weeks after his good buddy bantering with Hannity. I don't know why he goes all Jerry Lewis on the guests representing views left of center???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
46. still think it is "fake" news
it sounds more real than the Goebbels propaganda machine...er...Fox News, MSNBC, CNBC, talk radio, etc.

google joseph goebbels and see what turns up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-04 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
49. Most interesting bits
-Clarke saying Clinton really drove anti-terror policy, not Clarke forcing him to focus on it. Surprised Stewart. Lot of aspects to that. Wish there'd been more follow up on it, which is I think what Clarke expected.

-Stewart's comment that the book wasn't really all that controversial--that Clarke wasn't saying anything that wasn't already out there, pretty much. This is true of course, and the answer, that Clarke is more of an insider, so his views have more impact, is only part of the explanation for the shitstorm he has been under.

The real explanation is that this isn't an ordinary adminstration, full of people who want to do good and who are focused on empirical things--policy, programs, cause and effect. Rather, it's a medieval court, and the chief value, the ONLY value really, is loyalty. Fealty to the liege-lord, W. You can say all kinds of stupid or negative things so long as you maintain loyalty (cf. some of Rummy's leaked memos), but even the most mildly critical things are intolerable--and will be ruthlessly punished--if they are framed as a breach of loyalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. cult of personality
a defining feature of any totalitarian regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarchy1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #49
51. On the nosey!
Edited on Wed Mar-31-04 12:11 AM by anarchy1999
Exactly: "I'm quitting 'cause of the same reason everyone else around here is quitting. I've had my share of you, and then some. You're piss poor, boss. Fugoff."

MY most interesting bit:
Jon - Which is worse, the partisan rancor or the bureaucratic ineptitude?
Dick - They're equally bad.

Why choose between two reasons why we hate the boss? All reasons are allowed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #51
55. Those problems run deeper than Bush
the trend started long ago. I'm guessing during Reagan's time. It's no small feat to change that. We need thousands of good people to go into government service. I'm considering it as well seeing as how bad the job market is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiahzero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #55
60. Here's part of the problem
Left-wingers tend to look down on some government service as unethical... look at the attacks on the military, the CIA, and such that happen here on DU with alarming frequency.

I know it makes me feel uncomfortable, since I'm planning on going into the civil service when I get out of college... to some people, that apparently disqualifies me as a liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #51
59.  Why choose between two reasons why we hate the boss?
I loved Clarke's reply. "Both"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
56. kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nlighten1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
57. Wonk?
Do you have this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC