Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Daniel Ellsberg on Richard Clarke

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 07:24 AM
Original message
Daniel Ellsberg on Richard Clarke
I subscribe to Daniel Ellsberg's email list. I received a very lengthy email - some excerpts....

"When famous whistle-blower Daniel Ellsberg boarded a plane to Cincinnati earlier this week, he took along a little light reading: a stack of articles about former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke, who has stirred controversy with allegations in his book and testimony before a special panel that the Bush White House was somewhat indifferent to al Qaeda before Sept. 11 and obsessed with Iraq afterward.

Ellsberg, who in 1971 leaked the Pentagon Papers documenting government misrepresentations about the Vietnam War, sees Clarke as part of a trend: well-placed individuals in the government who have gone public with books or interviews outlining their concerns and criticisms about their country's government--while that government is still in power."

snip...(we all remember Bush's obsession with loyalty - here's why)

"To Ellsberg, the fact that a number of Bush's own people have been willing to break that presumption of loyalty is a strong condemnation of the president and his neo-conservative allies, something Clarke himself has hinted at in public statements."

Asked on "60 Minutes" whether he owed loyalty to the president, Clarke responded, "Up to a point. When the president starts doing things that risk American lives, then loyalty to him has to be put aside."

To subscribe to the Ellsberg.Net email list, send a blank email with
"list" in the subject heading to list@ellsberg.net

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. That one must be loyal to his/her country is a given and those elected
to national office take a sworn oath to protect, preserve, and defend the Constitution of the United States, that's protect, preserve, and defend the Constitution. Loyalty by those serving the officeholder is also a given, but where does loyalty lie when the Constitution is not being protected, preserved and defended, to the officeholder or the Constitution, the officeholder or the country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-04 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ellsberg was here in Richmond KY last Thursday
and my hubby went to hear him speak. He spoke quite extensively about Clarke and also about Katharine Gun (UK whistleblower). He got a good write up in our local paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC