the scary part -- per what Robert Fisk's been reporting -- is that mercenaries are now protecting the army!?!
(from an interview he did this morning -- see also Sunday's Independent:
"What does worry people is that Americans are replacing their troops at the Baghdad International Airport with Chilean forces which we know have been trained in the army there at the time of Pinochet. The real problem is we don't know what their rules of engagement are. We don't know where they stand vis-à-vis the war. If they are ambushed, do they fire back? If they kill innocent people are they responsible? Can they be made amenable to the law if they're guilty? At my own hotel in Baghdad, some of the security services have set up shop and they're young employees. They swagger in and out with heavy weapons, with automatic weapons and pistols as if they're cowboys. They seemed to have learned their fighting spirits in Hollywood. It's a little bit too much of, if I can put it frankly, spraying of testosterone on the ground. My colleagues feel this is making our own hotel dangerous and a possible target: undefended barracks. There are thousands of them, and it appears to be correct, there are now more British Mercenary Security Service men here than there are British soldiers in Iraq. The question many Iraqis were asking, is this the new face of the occupation? The Americans disappear, the British disappear, and this army of mercenaries wearing flak jackets and an assortment of weapons with little badges, some South African, some clearly British and some Americans are now supposed to be the security services?"
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/31/1616230To the best of my knowledge Bremer (& Garner before him) have always had private security (f-knows why) but I'm not sure why I think I know that! (if you get my drift)