Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How to defend against wedge issues....gay marriage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 12:33 PM
Original message
How to defend against wedge issues....gay marriage
This is a fairly academic article, but fascinating. An academician, Mendelberg, analyzes how the use of the Willie Horton ad was so successful. Then went on to explain how it worked and how to fight against it.

Thrust and Parry
How Kerry can fend off this year's version of "wedge politics"
by Chris Barrett, Contributor

http://gadflyer.com/articles/?ArticleID=72
snip..

It's worth pausing here to explain this unusual finding. What Mendelberg has found is that voters must be confident that their motives in supporting a candidate are unimpeachable. If they believe that a candidate has become associated with an unsavory political view, they will abandon that candidate, even – and this is important – if part of them agrees with that view.

From this finding, Mendelberg draws two prescriptions: (1) political candidates can turn an implicit campaign into an explicit one by calling it what is; and (2) the counter-claim must be broadcast and debated to encourage voters to re-evaluate the issue.

A similar challenge now emerges in the form of President Bush's gathering campaign against gay marriage. The issue of sexuality pushes a great many of the same implicit buttons for voters as does race, but the key ones are that those affected are a minority, and that the campaign has that most precious asset of all: deniability. We have already heard, and will hear again, that the issue is not one of discrimination, but the protection of the institution of marriage. In this way, a deeply negative campaign is "laundered" into a positive one.

snip...

Which brings us to John Kerry. Candidate Kerry has thus far adopted a compromise position: he is against gay marriage, but for civil unions. He opposes President Bush's constitutional ban on gay marriage. This is the conventional response to a wedge attack, staking out a nuanced policy position and probably hoping the issue will go away. But the problem with wedge issues is that the other side won't cooperate in making the issue go away. President Bush may have been pressured by the right wing of his party to raise the issue, but Kerry's discomfort no doubt assures him that in the end it will work to the Republicans' advantage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is a very interesting article
OK, I'm kicking my own thread. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC