I dunno, sounds a bit like forcing a municiple government to subsidize a campaign
http://www.billingsgazette.com/index.php?id=1&display=rednews/2003/08/08/build/local/54-cheney.inc<snip> Vice President Dick Cheney's fund-raising visit Wednesday was a fund-drainer for the city of Billings.
<snip> Cheney's 21/2-hour stopover in Billings reportedly raised $175,000 for the Bush-Cheney re-election campaign, and it cost the city of Billings about $15,500, mostly in overtime costs for police officers, firefighters and airport workers.
<snip> City Finance Director Bob Keefe said local government wouldn't be seeking reimbursement from the president's re-election committee or anyone else.
<snip> "My experience tells me we're responsible for providing reasonable security for public officials," he said.
/// OK, an imcumbant gets a lot of perks and freebies and all that, but it would be good to take the attitude of Billings Police Chief Ron Tussing, and start to call foul loud and clear when $$ strapped cities are basically forced to help fund campaigns:
<snip> In all, Tussing said, overtime costs were about $10,000. Tussing said he didn't expect the city to be reimbursed for the expenses, but added, "I can see a difference between when Bush came to town ... to address the public and a strictly partisan fund-raising situation like we had yesterday."
///The misAdministration is doing
everything it can to duck federal spending on the communal needs of the peoples and heap all costs for programs onto the shoulders of state and local governments. It may be time for us to start blowing a whistle on this behavior of insisting on personal responsibility while ducking it themselves. When cities can't hire enough police, firemen, teachers, nor afford enough school books and basic services for its citizen/taxpayers, fat cat pols should suck it up and provide their own security for private visits.
edited to add a phrase