Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Taxes and economics, a little rant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Pobeka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 03:12 PM
Original message
Taxes and economics, a little rant
I was in the store today, and noticed this guy with
a crate of bottled water. So, I thought to myself:

"How stupid is this world?. Here we are, buying bottles of water at outrageous prices, transporting water on trucks, rather than paying a little extra to prevent ground water pollution, and ensure safe clean water for the tap. (Please note I live in Tacoma, WA with what used to be some of the best quality water in the continental USA.) This is anti-tax mentality gone to the level of complete and utter insanity. It's sooooo much cheaper for each citizen to chip in a tiny fraction in taxes rather than buy bottled water or water filters because we don't like what comes from the tap.

And how about policing ourselves? Police have been stretched thin for decades now. What's the solution our society has? -- home security systems. If everyone who felt it necessary to get a home security system had instead spent half that amount of money in taxes for a municipal police force, then the police could actually have enough people to track down and prevent common theft. As it is police can only focus on violent crimes."

Done with my rant. What other services are economically best served by a little taxation rather than direct expenses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BushHasGotToGo Donating Member (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am actually studying game theory for my test right now
Pretty much what benefits the community as a whole may not benefit each individual person (taken as a sum of the entire population)

I don't know if you understood what I said, because I kinda don't. Maybe somebody could clear my thoughts up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pobeka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. But you need to think about fixed costs
Do you really believe trucking water around is cheaper than having appear at the tap?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rogerashton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. You are doing OK --
that's the idea of the generalized Prisoner's Dilemma you are describing, and you have it down OK. The feeling of understanding will come with time and practice.

Game Theory Teacher --- rogerashton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. but isn't it always better to benefit the community?
I thought the essence of game theory is that doing what's best for the community is best for the individual? Or am I mixing up Nash and game theory?

Itty bitty words please, I'm not anywhere near being able to carry on a discussion at your level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wish I had Tacoma water!
I live in outside Enumclaw about 100' from the Tacoma water line from Chester Morse Water shed. I can't drink our Water which comes from a city Well about 100' from me. We have some much ground contaminents, and other crap that we drink Bottled water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chesley Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am not sure
that more police will do any good if the criminals are freed soon after they are caught. However, more money spent on the police ( more professional, better equiped, etc.) can't be all bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pobeka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Then perhaps a little tax money towards prisons would help.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chesley Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. How about some
hard-ass judges and clear thinking appeals courts??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pobeka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. But I think your point about criminals being released is valid
Because if prisons are over-crowded, they start releasing the least dangerous to society. Hard-assed judges won't solve that, in fact, it'd be more expensive potentially, because we have to constantly re-try people for more offenses that never would have happened if we could just keep them in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chesley Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I have absolutely
no objections to spending tax money on prisons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jafap Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. a couple books you should read
The Fall of the Prison
A Time to Die

If you think that more prisons are going to be the answer to anything. You might also want to consider that a murderer like JR Bush and a thief like Ken Lay are never going to be prosecuted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rogerashton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. There are some activities that ought to be decriminalized
or punished only with fines. We have way too many people in prison. A real full employment policy would help, too -- to some extent, prisons are a warehouse for chronically unemployed males.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pobeka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. yep that too.
So, ... is it cheaper to pay people to do honest work for the government -- say improving infrastructure, supporting infrastructure, rather than pay for them to be in prison? I don't know, a few guards can guard a lot of prisoners ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jafap Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Fines are very disciminatory
If Curt Warner gets a speeding ticket, he can laugh at a $50 fine and increased insurance costs. It is a much harsher penalty for me. Maybe if fines were set proportional to last years income, then police would have an incentive to ticket rich people instead of engaging in "poverty profiling".
Otherwise I am very much in agreement with what you said. Prisons are also a place where you can pay American men third world wages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzzcook Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Well we have another trade off there
By not spending a lesser amount on schools and services for children and young people, we end up spending more on prisons.

Kind of a bind though, because prisons are much more satisfying to build than schools. The gratification from building prisons is instant for schools we don't see the direct benefit because it is so diffuse.

Buzzcook
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pobeka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Oh sheesh
<sarcasm>
You're not going to start quoting numbers about how educated people don't commit crimes?
</sarcasm>

<leadfoilhat>
But, then if we educated the people, how could someone like Bush ever get elected?
</leadfoilhat>

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jafap Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. considering how much of your tapwater is not drunk
excessive purification is a little bit of a waste. Alot of what is being removed is just minerals, and why bother for water which is just going to be flushed down a toilet or put onto a lawn. It would be more economical to just buy a water-filter for your tap for your drinking water and washing water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. That's liberalism in a nutshell.
If we all work together, we'll all be better off. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pobeka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I guess I don't call that liberalism
I just call it common sense. And I wonder why the guy paying for the water bottles at what must be about 100 times the price he could be getting from the tap doesn't recognize it either. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-10-03 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. Public penny wise, private pound foolish.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC