|
by and large support their quorum-breaking. (One of the reasons the Republicans have such a solid state Senate majority in the first place, I believe, is gerrymandering that left Democrats "packed" into fewer districts-- there's some process in Texas for a board, made up in large part of the holders of statewide offices occupied by Republicans in 2000, to redistrict the state legislature when the two houses can't agree on a plan, as they couldn't in 2000 back when the Texas House had a Democratic majority). So if this is what Perry has in mind, the threat of special elections shouldn't be too much of a problem, unless Perry is planning to somehow bar the absent Senators from running for reelection (on grounds of nonresidence in the state or something-- though unless Texas has an unusual system I don't think that's up to him, and by the usual definitions of legal residence it would be laughable). The only remaining worrisome possibility is that perhaps while the special elections were proceeding, the vacancies would cause a quorum to be defined as 2/3 of the remaining Senators-- I don't know whether the Texas Constitution's language would allow this, but it seems plausible.
I think Perry's language probably wasn't this significant, though; if he were trying to set something up, I would have expected him to use the word "abandoned" instead of "abdicated their responsibilities", and the whole idea seems like it might be too crazy even for him (though how low he's willing to sink is hard to gauge at this point).
|