Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The only legit WMD discovery David Kay could announce...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_Andy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 12:24 PM
Original message
The only legit WMD discovery David Kay could announce...
would be,

1) Proof that Iraq "attempted to buy uranium form Niger", or...

2) Proof that Iraq was "six months away from developing a weapon", or...

3) Proof that Saddam was in any way involved with 9/11, or...

4) Proof that Saddam worked closely with Osama or al Qaeda, or...

5) Proof that Saddam was about to give poisonous gas or deadly germs to terrorists, or...

6) Proof of unmanned aerial drones capable of striking the US, or...

7) Proof that the aluminum tubes were only suitable for centrifuges, or...

8) Proof that the "mobile bio-weapons labs" were not for intended for hydrogen production, or..

9) Proof that Chimpy McWarmonger is not a lying SOB!!!

Not bloody likely!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Given the media, we all should be very weary of the Kay report.
I mean the man is practically giddy with the thought of releasing such a forged document.

How can one be an impartial investigator and at the same time be dropping hints and lies before such info is ready?

Kay needs to be singled out and labled as the professional baffon he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. the thing that concerns me the most is those missles
rounds with the filler valves. i saw the pictures of them one night.
i have watched for the debunking ever since. they have dropped totally off the scene. it worries me because no one can come up with an alternate explaination for those valves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Andy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-03 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Filler valves? link?
Not sure to which report you refer. Here's Blix's UN reports;

http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/recent%20items.html

45 pages. Some mention of missiles, but I found nothing on filler valves.

LA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC