If the DOJ has the goods on Padilla, why don't they charge him?
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-01-04 03:58 PM
Original message |
If the DOJ has the goods on Padilla, why don't they charge him? |
|
I think it's because they don't have the goods, and I think they're nakedly trying to influence the SC decision by releasing their alleged "new information" now.
Untrustworthy scum.
|
ewagner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-01-04 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
|
the pending SC decisions........that's probably what this is really all about.
Good guess/call.
|
Gothmog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-01-04 04:21 PM
Response to Original message |
2. DOJ can not used confession obtained by torture |
|
At the very minimum, Padilla's Miranda rights have been violated by denying him access to a lawyer during questioning. Any confession obtained during such questioning would not be admissible.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 03:21 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.