Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is the impetus behind Bush hiring a lawyer?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ALago1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:46 PM
Original message
What is the impetus behind Bush hiring a lawyer?
The latest news was quite the shock to me.

Is it reasonable to assume that there is a movement underway to investigate Bush for treason? Or is that too much to assume right now?

Anyone have any idea why Bush needs representation? I'd like to hear all your speculation. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. It reminds me of the day I was listening to Rush and the report that
Edited on Wed Jun-02-04 06:49 PM by Mountainman
Clinton had sex with an intern came on. Callers were sure Clinton would resign with in the week. Wing nuts were so happy then.

This could lead to nothing much also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southsideirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. And another one hits the dust...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. A Grand Jury
is not something Bush can directly control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. He's lawyering up as a precaution
he may or may not be called in front of a grand jury in the Plame case. If he is, he's too damn dumb to speak for himself. Hence the mouthpiece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacifictiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. LOL, I was just thinking
he won't be able to have Cheney as a mouthpiece this time. He's hiring a lawyer to do the talking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Didn't hear about this.......love to get more facts.
A personal lawyer or Presidential counsel? If personal, there must be something very interesting going on behind the scenes.

I've often thought that if he went, it would be sudden and with negotiated cover unrelated to the actual reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ALago1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Take a look 'round DU
Plenty of info on here describing what we already know.

Bush has hired a private lawyer (not gov't) regarding the Plame case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waverley_Hills_Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Im not getting my hopes up....
...I suspect it has something to do with the Plame investigation, but that has been dragging on now. Bush might be questioned, but Im not getting my hope up that he will be direclty implicated if anything should come of this.

As Ive said before, the Plame investigation will only become a big scandal if some high-level people, like Scooter Liddy, are indicted. Just wrapping up the investigation without anything proven or any smoking guns that would lead to an indictment really wont hack it.

Its going to have to be real legal action that blows this up into a scandal, and real lega action against high level and key adivsors with direct connections to Cheney or Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freetobegay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. I wonder if he will get an "activist Judge"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. The questions are getting close.
What do the cops call it?...oh yeah,..."consciousness of guilt."


Note: I don't expect much of this. But you never know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's very interesting
but I think that people should be EXTREMELY careful about pushing the idea that hiring a lawyer is an indicator of wrongdoing. That's a VERY dangerous genie to let out of the bottle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ALago1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I'm just enjoying the hypocrisy from the right
I'm sure that this motion by Bush will be deemed "no big deal", when back in the Clinton years he was castigated fiercely for hiring a private lawyer.

The freeps either have a very short memory or a relativistic sense of morality...or both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. Gotta Love That Paula Jones...Hee Hee
One reason Bunnypants has to lawyer up is thanks to his beloved Supreme Court allowing investigations to take place on a sitting pResident or other members of his regime.

Sounds like his Assholiness could be called in front of a grand jury...which means this probe is getting awfully close to home; methinks Scooter Libby is changing his underware at very frequent intervals today. Right now MessyNBC is attempting to downplay this thing...but the fact that the investigation has gotten this "hot" is newsworthy.

This regime could attempt to fight it with "Executive Privilidge" and stonewall as they have in other investigations, but the lesson from both Watergate and the Clinton Inquisition is whenever in doubt, lawyer up...especially if you know you could be hauled in to testify or on the short list.

Nope, not a good thing for the evil empire. Could be nothing, as I can't see Fitzgerald, a Repugnican, calling Bunnypants to testify before November, if at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. I am confident
that the shit is going to hit the fan in this case towards mid-July. It is going to create a vacancy in the office of the vice president. I agree fully with the person who warned against making any judgements because a person (even a president) hires an attorney. This case is not going to involve bush directly -- first, it's very unlikely he had prior knowledge, and second, even if he took part in the aftermath, others will protect him. But not cheney. This involves Rove, cheney, and others. Buy a bottle of good wine, etc, and mark it July 14th. On that day, I believe you will lift a glass, and say the Water Man was right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ALago1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I'm marking my calendar Water Man!
Hope that you are proven right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Good!
My brother-in-law has been frustrated for many months because this issue has not received the attention it deserves. I've told him over and over that it gets HUGE in mid-July. I am very impressed with Wilson's book, and loved John Dean's review in the 5-23 NYTimes Book review: "Don't Tread on Joseph Wilson." He notes the federal grand jury, and the on-going white house attempts to discredit Wilson in the media. The administration, Dean says, "should understand that they have picked a fight with the wrong fellow."

We talk on DU about MI and CIA etc. And not always in terms of endearment. That's okay, because there are obvious problems. But we should never underestimate the problems this administration has created for itself when it has consistently blamed others such as the CIA for its errors. What they did to Wilson's wife was terrible. Wrong group of people to threaten.

I'm confident that 7-14, you and I will be toasting the investigation. We'll keep in touch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Ohh July 14th would be a good day for the
shit to hit the fan, H2O Man!

Bastille Day!

A good omen on many levels.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Tell me more....
I know that it marks the beginning of the French Revolution, and I associate it with the Bastille fortress. That had been used to "house" political prisoners in times before the Revolution?

It's also on or about St. Swithin's Day in Ireland. There is a belief that is as old as the Bastille fortress that is associated with a meteorological prophecy: if it rains that day, it will bring 40 days and 40 nights of rain .....

It seems that it is a Celtic "holy day." We'll have a toast that day, for sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-04 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. wouldnt be surprised if bush isnt right in the middle
of it. when it comes to meanness bush enjoys it too much to be left out. he would want to wallow and play in it more than anyone else. further, in the meanness of spirit taking over, i can see them being less than cautious, they are awfully arrogant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC