Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bob Barr on CNN -- ME situation is CARTER'S fault

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 12:39 PM
Original message
Bob Barr on CNN -- ME situation is CARTER'S fault
He gutted the CIA by bringing in Stansfield Turner. Of course Ronald Reagan tried to fix it, but then CLINTON screwed it all up again.

I swear to god. And the talking head is tossing him all the softballs. This has been a consistent pattern on the airwaves today. The GOP has its army of shills is out in full damage control mode today. Beware!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. this is the dude that paid for abortion to his wife
as he was having an affair with a staffer, to later marry, and then a short time later preached clinton was sinful and need to be impeached, jumping all over the constitution.

right.......lol lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. carter
Let me see if I remember, Carter brought Egypt and Israel together
Clinton brought Israel and the Palestinians together?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. yeah, he's just annoyed that Reagan/Bush
failed to start a nuclear war in the region in the ensuing 12 years, I guess, bringing on Armageddon so he can git Raptured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's pretty desperate
Usually they stop with "It's Clinton's Fault!" (tm)

Before long it'll be Truman's fault. *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossfish Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well, it is really...
Jefferson's fault...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. John Locke's fault....
that bastard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. well i could
argue that it was trumans fault but it`s to nice outside here in the midwest to argue the point....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah that Israel/Egypt peace agreement really fucked things up
And Clinton working to bring peace between the Jews and the Palestinians and getting closer than anyone ever imagined was a really bad move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. That peace still holds, right? Dang liberal Nobel price committee!
Is Bob still suing Clinton or is he on a hiatus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. It sure was "fucked" up! Look how many Isrealis and Egyptians.....
have killed each other since, ZERO!!!

Once a Rethug, Always a Rethug!

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. Screwed up after Reagan!
Reagan presented a good idea at the time.....it was known as the peace dividend. The cold war is over, and we don't need to be spending billions on defense, CIA, and a hugh military.

I must admit, I believed that too at the time. If your opponent is gone, and you don't see another one on the horizon, it makes sense to reduce the size of the force you needed to defeat it.

It seems to me that EVERYONE agreed with that idea.

Whose fault was it that we didn't see there was a new emerging enemy, I don't know. I thought Clarke mentioned raising flags about al Qaeda and noone paid much attention to him. I know there was a Commission, Rudman, Hart, etc, that issued strong warnings at the end of the Clinton Admin, and beginning of Shrub, but their suggestions were disregaurded.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. That boy should go back to
flippin' pancakes....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. Expect more of the same.
The Iraqi resistance isn't desperate, it's the right-wing cabal here in the USA that is getting desperate. I expect them to pressure the corporate media and launch a full out assault on the truth. The themes are familiar:
- It was all Clinton's, Carter's, Kennedy's, Truman's, and Roosevelt's fault.
- Liberals are traitors and support the terrorists.
- Liberals don't have the nerve to fight terrorists (chickenhawks like Barr do though!)
- Iraq = al qaeda.
- The thousands of WMDs are being hidden in Syria, which is instigating attacks on our troops!

This is a treacherous and powerful corporate cabal in control of our country right now. They will not give up total control without a fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. Any Democrat will do, the farther back they can push the blame the better.
another one I wanted to reach through the screen and strangle. My my, glad it's Friday!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. It sounds like Bush Crime Family spin.
Edited on Fri Jun-04-04 12:59 PM by yardwork
Didn't Carter replace Poppy Bush as head of CIA? Or was there someone in there in between?

Follow Poppy Bush's career - it explains a lot about who is on what side now.

Nixon goes down and Ford takes over and makes Poppy Bush head of CIA. Deep Throat is rumored to be whatsisname who is big in Baby Bush's administration now.

Reagan comes along and screws up Ford's chances to be reelected, putting that "wimp" Carter in charge and messing up all Poppy's plans. The Bushes and Reagans don't get along very well.

Poppy Bush runs for president but that damn Reagan is in his way again - eventually there is nothing to do but swallow that Bush Crime Family pride and make the pragmatic decision to join Reagan as VP. At least Poppy now has control over foreign policy since Reagan is gaga. First thing is the deal with Iran to hang onto those hostages and the deal with OPEC to keep oil prices high until Poppy, er... Reagan is firmly ensconced in the WH.

Things look a little dicey when some of the truth about Iran-Contra starts to leak out but in general Poppy has eight years plus four of his very own to set up private contracting firms teaching terrorism, er... anti-communist efforts in South America and Africa and the Middle East.

Then that *&^%$ Clinton comes along and wrecks everything for Poppy again. Eight years of working behind the scenes and cleaning up DimSon so he is mildly presentable, getting DimSon and OlderSon into governorships of two great big states with lots of electoral votes, and generally causing trouble behind the scenes, breaking the knees of the press, etc.

And now it looks like that #$^* Kerry is trying to wreck things for Poppy and DimSon again!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. Oh, geez whiz. How far back do they wanna go to blame their
problems on someone else? Didn't Carter win the Nobel Peace Prize?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zuni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. by bringing in Stansfield Turner
of course Reagan fixed everything by bringing in the entirely legible Bill Casey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well one thing they have to give the Dems credit for...
They sure know how to keep the horrible flaws in their policies under control while they are in office. Clinton did for 8 years before all hell broke loose under Bush.

/end sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC