David Brooks is Losing his Hair at a Very Rapid Rate

[Stephanie]

I hope he is in good health.

Assuming that he is, he has very little hair left.

Combined with his teeny little girly hands, I think it's a good thing that he already got married. He's beginning to look like Barney Fife.

This is one neo-con who is not yet under investigation, has not taken a polygraph in the Chalabi case, has not been questioned by Fitzgerald (I think). It's time to take him on.

Why is he the conservative darling of PBS, NPR and the NY Times?


But back to his HAIR:


July 24, 2001



May 28, 2004


May 28, 2004

[priller]

1. Join the club

He's about my age, and my hair has been going away also. It's mainly age and unfortunate genetics.

[Stephanie]

3. On most men it's sexy

It's an indication of high testorone so it's attractive on a sort of subliminal level.

But for Brooks I believe that the more he lies, the more hair he loses.

[struggle4progress]

2. Maybe he is pulling out whenever he thinks about the President

I know that I would find it stressful to defend Bonzo.

[librechik]

4. You should see the portrait hidden in his closet

he's as young and lovely as a little girl.

Ooops!

Next time you sell your soul to Satan, make sure you get the terms straight, David!

Thx for this thread, Steph!

[Emboldened Chimp]

5. I dunno....looks the same to me

[Stephanie]

6. Nah.

He's just about run out of hair.


May 21, 2004

[Justice]

7. It the stress of all those lies

[Stephanie]

11. That's what I think

The downward spiral of the neo-cons is aging him rapidly. Plus Kristol must chew him out regularly for failing in his mission of selling the neo-cons' dreams to the NY Times readers. They're miserable failures, he's a miserable failure as their PR guy, and some of them are going to jail. Which ones?

[Waverley_Hills_Hiker]

8. I think hes a closet case...did you say the political wrap tonight...

Brooks and Tom Oliphant...it was like "Girlfreind!" "Lets talk politics"!

[baldguy]

9. *ahem*

[Stephanie]

10. please see post #3

above