|
of sounding very mean-spirited myself, I really thought that the 50th anniversary of D-Day would be the last big celebration of it. At what point do we stop trotting out the frail and tottering old men?
Not that we should forget about it totally, but wouldn't a quieter, more dignified remembrance have been more appropriate in the first place? The ONLY reason Bush got geared up for this particular anniversary is that it's occurring in an election year, and so it seemed like a good idea at the time.
If they'd had a crystal ball to tell them that St. Ronnie would have the good timing to die on June 5th, they'd have planned for just such a quiet celebration, knowing that a week of funeral services could be used even better to showcase their political party. Instead, we have this circus of a funeral competing with an over-blown commemoration.
But that's just my opinion.
|