Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another PR Nightmare brewing for Shrubya...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 11:03 PM
Original message
Another PR Nightmare brewing for Shrubya...
it's over Drudge, no link (yet, appears to be London Times) but here's the highlights...

Prosecutors are struggling to build a case against Saddam Hussein because they lack both witnesses and evidence to prove the ousted Iraqi dictator is guilty of atrocities, according to a British official quoted by The Times on Monday. Although the US-led coalition has caught 40 of the 55 people on its list of "most-wanted" Iraqis linked to Saddam's former regime, none of them will testify for the prosecution, the unnamed official said.

The newspaper's source also said the Iraqi dictator, ousted by the US and British invasion in March 2003, had hidden any written proof of his direct responsibility for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

A 20-member defense team appointed by Saddam's family has complained about not being able to meet its client and accused the US authorities of holding him in breach of the Geneva Conventions.

----------------------

OK .. lets count the ways this can bite BushCo in the ButtCo..

- No evidence, no conviction. The 'sovereign govt' cuts Saddam loose (knowing full well that he won't last 30 seconds in the outside world, but this makes the US looks like fools).

- US Forces 'court' to convict him anyway.. 'sovereign govt' is made to look like the puppets they will be.

- US Takes Saddam away for 'trial' for 9/11... 'sovereign govt' screams foul.

- All of the above pervert the off quoted "Rule of Law" the 'pugs love to quote..

- Geneva Convention violations... 'nuff said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
I thought so. Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think SH has a safety net.
That is plenty of documents detailing his romance with the Bushco. He didn't stay in power that long because he is dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Uh no photos or Vids?
Didn't Chalabi get there 1st and grab all kinds of documents
of Saddam's. Isn't one of Chalabi's cousins a main judge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soggy Donating Member (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-04 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. i'm sure they can get powell to testify <eom>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. Irrelevant - Bush hads him over to Iraq for justice which means his death
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. Rove wants to have the Saddam Show Trial all summer long
Their plan is to have the trial all summer, with 24-hr coverage, like the OJ trial. They want weeping witnesses and long stories of Saddam's atrocities, with pictures.

Then they will probably stage a big public execution.

Followed by the capture of Osama bin Laden.

This is how they plan to win in November. This glitch would throw the whole schedule off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crossroads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I fear you're right...
...the OJ thing!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. If Saddam is responsible for atocities Bush is responsible for Abu Gharib
You just can't get away from it. The difference is that Bush led a nation that invaded another nation and performed atocities on the occupied people. Saddam led a regime that, according to their thinking, was fighting people who wanted to overthrow Iraq's government. So Bush has to be more guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. Well, the new Iraqi "gov't" just trotted out the death penalty again...
says Saddam should get a firing squad....

Forget the trial, he'll just be rubbed out and they'll say he did of natural causes.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC