|
it's over Drudge, no link (yet, appears to be London Times) but here's the highlights...
Prosecutors are struggling to build a case against Saddam Hussein because they lack both witnesses and evidence to prove the ousted Iraqi dictator is guilty of atrocities, according to a British official quoted by The Times on Monday. Although the US-led coalition has caught 40 of the 55 people on its list of "most-wanted" Iraqis linked to Saddam's former regime, none of them will testify for the prosecution, the unnamed official said.
The newspaper's source also said the Iraqi dictator, ousted by the US and British invasion in March 2003, had hidden any written proof of his direct responsibility for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
A 20-member defense team appointed by Saddam's family has complained about not being able to meet its client and accused the US authorities of holding him in breach of the Geneva Conventions.
----------------------
OK .. lets count the ways this can bite BushCo in the ButtCo..
- No evidence, no conviction. The 'sovereign govt' cuts Saddam loose (knowing full well that he won't last 30 seconds in the outside world, but this makes the US looks like fools).
- US Forces 'court' to convict him anyway.. 'sovereign govt' is made to look like the puppets they will be.
- US Takes Saddam away for 'trial' for 9/11... 'sovereign govt' screams foul.
- All of the above pervert the off quoted "Rule of Law" the 'pugs love to quote..
- Geneva Convention violations... 'nuff said
|