In one speech he made, Bush* used the phrases Saddam and 9/11 in the same sentence, encouraging his listeners to make the leap. He got away with this, so began actually saying that Saddam was responsible for 9/11. No one called him on it. Bringing down Saddam has long been the intention of people like Wolfowitz, but they needed a warmonger like Bush* in office to carry out their agenda.
I blame the American media. The press needs to challenge these outrageous statements. It is their business to keep up to speed on these things, so they certainly know that what Bush* is saying has no basis in fact. Because he is unchallenged when he makes these statements, the American public believes them. The majority of Americans support Bush*s illegal and bloody war because 9/11 terrified them and they think that bringing down Saddam will make them safer. We were told that he was an ``imminent threat.'' Bush* needs to be called on these lies. I was glad to hear several of the Democratic candidates saying just this in the recent forum in Philadelphia. They need to keep saying it until the American public catches on.
General Wesley Clark said, on
Meet the Press back in June that he was contacted by the White House, on 9/11, to publicly connect Saddam Hussein to those horrific events. He asked for evidence that this was true. He never received any. Here is a link to Gen. Clark's statements. This is a
Truthout ediitorial from DU's own Will Pitt. He gets to Gen. Clark's
Meet the Press statements about halfway through the article, which, BTW, is an excellent read, like all that Will has written.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/062303A.shtmlI agree. It is also about money. The Carlyle Group stands to make a great deal from this war. I am sorry about your dad. My dad was a lifelong Republican, but he was also an intelligent man and I like to think that he would not have been bamboozled by Bush* and his lies.