Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll: Big Labour Losses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 04:58 PM
Original message
Poll: Big Labour Losses
BIG LABOUR LOSSES - POLL

As counting begins in the local council and European elections, a special Sky News poll suggests that if it had been a general election, Tony Blair would still be the Prime Minister, but without an overall majority. In the biggest ever online survey of British opinion, YouGov questioned around 7,000 electors.

And the results suggest that Labour would get 32% of the vote, the Tories 36%, Lib Dems 18%, UK Independence Party 7% and other parties 7%.In the House of Commons that would give Labour 327 seats, down 86; the Tories 257, up 91; Lib Dems 46, down 6, other parties 29 - but UKIP would not get a single seat on those figures.

In London, it looks as if Ken Livingstone will stay as mayor, but it is a close-run thing.

http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30000-13125048,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't Sky News owned by Rupert Murdoch?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It is, but it's not very biased
It's nothing like Fox News. Since it broadcasts from the UK, there are laws requiring it to really be 'fair and balanced'. It's about the same as a US broadcast news station - it wouldn't want to worry big business, but it doesn't start off trying to push a political point of view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does Blair even care that he might not have a majority...
as long as he gets to stay in office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-04 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes.
If your party has more seats, but not a majority, you need to form coalitions with other parties to achieve a majority. And doing that hampers your ability to get your agenda through without compromise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC