June 30, THE WAR ENDS, does that mean

[rainy]

our leaders can no longer say "we are at war" and therefore can they get the budget back in order and stop abusing our rights?

[fertilizeonarbusto]

1. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Surely you jest both about the war ending and our "leaders" being responsible.

[spinbaby]

2. No

It just means the new Iraqi "government" gets blamed for everything that goes wrong.

[Fenris]

3. Pilate washes his hands...

"Here it is, Iraqis. Good luck."

[Aunt Anti-bush]

4. "Mission Accomplished"

Yeah, sure...

[Solly Mack]

7. Wouldn't it be Mission Accomplished II

the sequel?

[progressiveBadger]

5. My wife and I watched Fog of War last night

and she made the point that there isn't going to be a VJ or VE day anymore. Who can we accept surrender from? Thank you Bush for the war that never ends.

[donhakman]

8. do over!

[H2O Man]

6. The war has been over

since 5-1-2003. You need to pay closer attention. Jeepers, after all presdent bush has done for you.

[NoPasaran]

9. The war doesn't end, only the occupation

Starting July 1, we'll be fighting the war as guests, not occupiers.

[Morning Dew]

10. But I've been wondering....

is the sovereign Iraqi government now responsible for all those juicy contract obligations?

[Hammie]

11. No,

We will still be "at war with terror"

Our troops will still be in Iraq burning through money like there is no tomorrow.

The Federal government will still be dreaming up new ways to trample your liberty. Face it, if it isn't the war on terror, it will be the war on drugs, the war on pollution, the war on pornography. There will always be some bogeyman to have a war with, a war that we just can't seem to win without giving up some more of our rights.


Excuse me, I think I have to go hurl now.