I thought you might be interested in it, TahitiNut. I'm not endorsing it or criticizing it, myself - it's an idiosyncratic thing, a thorn in the Canadian Forces' side with considerable credibility among the rank and file, but not always "liberal", from my admittedly cursory experience with it.
http://www.espritdecorps.ca/The current "in the news" articles include:
http://www.espritdecorps.ca/in_the_news.htmFear and mistrust deepen in Iraq
A detour with Kurdish secret police
Najaf nurses wounds of war
Shooting down missile defence plan
Americans take issue with news language
The Modern Coverage of War
An Inside Look at Elite Fighting Units
U.S. goes it alone in Iraq
Iraq Unravels: an Interview with Scott Taylor
NATO in Kosovo, a place of divided goals
"Americans take issue with news language" (May 3, 2004) --
http://www.espritdecorps.ca/new_page_168.htmThe terms used by various media outlets to describe Iraqi guerrillas have long been a sore point for U.S. military types. Following the publication of any of my news reports from Iraq that included the word "resistance," I have been inundated with hate mail from American soldiers, denouncing me as (among other things) an "Arab lover" and a "traitor." The common theme of all of these angry detractors is that only the word "terrorist" can be used to describe those who take up arms against Americans, along with the patriotic reminder to me that the U.S.A. "will never negotiate with terrorists."
... In three weeks of heavy combat, U.S. marines in Fallujah suffered more combat casualties than all the coalition forces had taken during the brief campaign to overthrow Saddam Hussein last spring. Unfortunately, the only result gained from the marines' heavy losses was the establishment of several heavily defended strongpoints on the outskirts of the rebellious city.
Even with their air force employing powerful C-130 gunships to blast Iraqi positions - not to mention inflicting civilian casualties - U.S. ground troops were unable to penetrate to the centre of Fallujah.
By the middle of last week, the Pentagon was still trying to put a brave spin on its failed offensive, but beyond the bravado was the quiet admission that a "ceasefire had been negotiated."
For the first time, the word "terrorist" was officially being replaced with the term "insurgent."
The "Commentaries" section
http://www.espritdecorps.ca/new_page_4.htmhas an article on DU (the other one) and loads of editorials about Iraq, including this about Maj. Gen. Lewis Mackenzie, quite a "liberal" (although Conservative, when there was an actual Conservative Party here and not the new neo-Con one we have now):
http://www.espritdecorps.ca/new_page_36.htmAs American forces remain firmly bogged down in the violent quagmire, those Canadian hawks who once argued in favor of joining Bush's coalition refuse to see the error in their judgment. Last week retired Major General Lewis Mackenzie penned an editorial chastising Canadians for 'gloating' over our government's decision not to participate in what has admittedly become a "difficult, dangerous, and expensive" U.S. led venture in Iraq.
Mackenzie argued that a significant number of Canadians are "suffering from short term memory loss regarding the war in Iraq, and the U.S. decision to lead a multinational force to topple Saddam's repugnant regime." Ironically, it would seem that Mackenzie is suffering from this very same affliction. The original battle cry of George W. Bush was that Saddam Hussein possessed a massive arsenal of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), and that Iraq posed a clear and present danger to world security.
... Unfortunately, given the fact that the Americans used falsehoods to justify their intervention, and proved unable to contain the post-war violence –– failure is the one word which sums up Bush's ill conceived foray into Iraq.
From the "Iraq Unravels" article (long, and I haven't read it all; these are just snippets) --
http://www.espritdecorps.ca/new_page_160.htmCanada's top war reporter, Scott Taylor is known for his two books on the Kosovo and Macedonia wars, and especially for his frequent reports from Iraq – many of which have been gathered in narrative form in his recent book, Spinning on the Axis of Evil: America's War Against Iraq. ...
CD: Scott, what can you tell us of the famed private soldiers/contractors of Iraq?
ST: Iraq is now full of private security officers, former Special Forces and Gurkhas, all armed to the teeth. These guys tend to be outfitted with Kalashnikovs and pistols, which sets them apart from the standard-issue US soldiers. They drive around in these modified armored Suburbans with tinted windows and rear-facing seats for a tail gunner.
CD: About the four American guys killed and mutilated in Fallujah. Do you feel sorry for them, or were they tempting fate? Is it possible they were just caught in the wrong place at the wrong time?
ST: Well, first of all, I can't say exactly what they were doing, but nobody just goes driving through Fallujah. They had some other role. But in any case they knew the risk. These guys were making $1,000 a day.
In some cases, the private contractors are in less immediate danger than the Iraqis – and always much better compensated. For example, the guys doing the de-mining training for Iraqis and mine-sniffing dogs are making from $14,000-$25,000 a month. But the Iraqis they instruct – the ones who actually have to go in and remove the mines – are making $152 a month.
CD: Does this piss them off? Are they even aware of the discrepancy?
ST: I spoke with Shaheen Jehad, a Turkman, former general under Saddam, and the nominal director of this de-mining program. He told me, "The salary is not important to us, because we are helping to make this a safer country for all Iraqi citizens." He was being sarcastic.
... CD: What about the relationship between the average US soldier and the private contractors? After all, like their Iraqi recruits the former are in more danger, and are less well-paid than the latter.
ST: There is a huge rift between the US Army and the Brown & Root guys. In fact, one soldier even asked me how much I was making to be in Iraq. I tried to explain to him that I was just a journalist, not a contractor, and I got paid by the story. He didn't seem to understand the difference. Referring to one of those guys making $14,000 a month, he scowled, "at least someone's making money out of this shit!"