Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Right wingers comparing Bush to . . . Lincoln?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:31 PM
Original message
Right wingers comparing Bush to . . . Lincoln?
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-barone17jun17,1,3722065.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions

<snip>
Consider the presidential election of 1864. The defeat of the incumbent, Abraham Lincoln, would have made an enormous difference. Union casualties were heavy throughout the year. It was widely expected that Gen. George McClellan, ousted from heading the Union army by Lincoln in 1862, would be the Democratic nominee and that he would win. Lincoln was renominated by the Republican National Convention in June, but through September many prominent Republicans were plotting to choose another nominee. Lincoln clearly stood for continued prosecution of the war, and the Republican platform came out strongly for the abolition of slavery. The Democrats were united around McClellan at their August convention but divided on policy. The Copperhead wing of the party wanted immediate peace, and it managed to write the party platform.

Is the 2004 election as consequential as the election of 1864? The answer to that question depends on what you think John Kerry's military and foreign policy would be, and there is room for thinking many things.
<snip>
:crazy:

If Bush had been President when the South seceded, he would have invaded Canada. Dumbasses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Exactly, Bush is a buffoon. Without marketing, he'd be just another
dry drunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. But...but...Busheviks HATE Lincoln
They would use (and DO use) Trotsky, no matter that he stood for the opposite of what they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. There is a reason noboby listens to NEWT
and this is just another reason. can you say irrelavant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, he is gonna preside over a civil war if things get muh worse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I was thinking that the other day....but it isn't geographically divide
so how do we do that.....will we become like the european nations,...ireland was prost....and catholics....mid east...jews and pala.....I sure hope we don't start lobbing bombs across at houses... we are so mixed......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morning Dew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. They'd get more traction with the slogan
Bush - still not as bad as Saddam!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. they can take bible quotes and support atrocities......they are
really wacked if they bring up lincoln....they want a great president so bad that they are just as delusional......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossfish Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. The very last line of this crap piece
Throwing out this president would make a difference.

=====

This asshole argues that because Kerry has "violently" critcized Bush and has more or less emboldened the "terrorists."

====


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlingBlade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hey, It’s a Free Country
And they can compare Bush to whomever they like.
Personally, I like to compare Him to Hitler and them to Fascist.
Before he and they got a running start that is.
But that’s just me.


:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC