Well... Just last week, Saudi's claim attacks were done by Zionists,

[fearnobush]

and not Al Qaeda. People...WTF!!! this is a total outrage and I for one am mad as FUCKING HELL!!! I am so pissed I will say that we went to war with the wrong country. 15 of the 19 911 terrorists from whare... Fucking Saudi Arabia. Zionists my Asscroft! people, scream out loud to the media whores backing our dictator Bush who is fully owned and controlled by our real government... the Fucking Saudi's.


<[e-mail] > The New York Times
<[e-mail] > Meet the Press
<[e-mail] > Newsweek
<[e-mail] > Keith Olbermann
<mailto:[e-mail] > Washington Post
<[e-mail] > MSNBC Main
<[e-mail] > Chris Matthews
<[e-mail] > The L A Times
<[e-mail]>

Below are all CNN contacts
<http://www.cnn.com/feedback > CNN's feedback link page

<[e-mail] >
<[e-mail] >
<[e-mail] >
<[e-mail] >
<[e-mail] >
<[e-mail] >
<[e-mail] >
<[e-mail] >
<[e-mail] >
<[e-mail] >
<[e-mail] >
<[e-mail] >
<[e-mail] >
<[e-mail] >
<[e-mail] >
<[e-mail] >

[Aidoneus]

1. "controlled by our real government... the Fucking Saudi's"

reading from the Protocols of the Elders of Madinah? :shrug:

Personally, and, as it works out, also from the standpoint of those who held the knife, I think you have that backwards.

[fearnobush]

5. I very well could, just mad as hell with the lies today.

[madrchsod]

2. ahhhh-you just figured that out???

no disrespect..the saudi`s have been doing this since the early 70`s. the saudi`s own a shit load of stuff in this country alot more than most people realize. we have backed them for years because they have backed our government by buying our debt.
yes fuck the saudi kings..it seems they can no longer pay off enemies

[DulceDecorum]

3. Are you referring to the hijackers

who are STILL ALIVE?
Just as the Saudi government claimed that they were?

I think you have been listening a little too closely
to the rantings of the neocon's powerpoint man,
Laurent Murawiec:
Briefly, the presentation said:
Iraq is the tactical pivot ...
Saudi Arabia the strategic pivot ...
Egypt the prize.

Here is the antidote.
The truth about Saudi Arabia.
http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Saudi_Arabia

[fearnobush]

6. Never Heard of Laurent Murawiec

but you have me retracting my post done in anger. Don't want to take over Saudi, but I'd like to see some real proof of those hijackers still being alive.

[DulceDecorum]

4. Blood and oil

If you think about it, however, the presence of so many Saudis of prominent background in the United States on September 11, some of whom were actually in Boston, and all of whom had to be flown out in a hurry to protect their own security, proves that the Saudi elites had absolutely no foreknowledge of 9-11. They would hardly leave their children in such a position if they had any knowledge that such an attack was going to occur.
<snip>
Blaming the wrong people diverts attention from the real guilty parties. As I've said before, the Saudis don't control NORAD, and since the standdown of normal air protection was crucial to the success of the 9-11 conspiracy, Americans ought to be looking much closer to home for the real culprits.
http://xymphora.blogspot.com/2004/06/saudi-connections-to-al-qaeda-not.html

It is believed that securing the oil fields of the Gulf region was the main factor that lit the spark of the Cold War and prompted the U.S.-Soviet rivalry. In the early 1950s the U.S. went as far as contemplating the possibility of destroying the oil fields in the event of a Soviet incursion.

As one declassified U.S. government document showed, the U.S. coordinated with the British government and British oil companies to blow up the oil fields in Iran and the Arabian Peninsula in the event of a Soviet invasion. To this end, President Harry Truman approved a plan to store explosives near the oil fields.

The plan was outlined in a National Security Council directive known as NSC 26/2. The U.S. considered even deploying radiological weapons to destroy the oil fields before the Soviets could seize them.

This latter option was rejected by the CIA because, according to NSC directive 26/3 dated June 1950, CIA officials noted: "Denial of the wells by radiological means can be accomplished to prevent an enemy from utilising the oil fields, but it could not prevent him from forcing "expendable" Arabs to enter contaminated areas to open well heads and deplete the reservoirs.

Therefore, aside from other effects on the Arab population, it is not considered that radiological means are practicable as a conservation measure." In addition, the U.S. needed to ensure the preservation of the resources for its own use after the expulsion of enemy forces.
http://www.gulf-news.com/Articles/opinion.asp?ArticleID=90209

Is Saddam the one who damaged the oilfields during the first Gulf War?
http://deoxy.org/wc/warcrime.htm
http://deoxy.org/wc/wc-death.htm