Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

STRAWMAN! Who cares about Saddam/Al Qaeda? What about the 9/11 LIHOP?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TruthIsAll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 02:49 PM
Original message
STRAWMAN! Who cares about Saddam/Al Qaeda? What about the 9/11 LIHOP?
Edited on Sat Jun-19-04 02:51 PM by TruthIsAll
How convenient. The NY Times is critical of BushCheney concerning the bogus Saddam/Al Qaeda/911 links. They want proof. Right.

STRAWMAN. CHANGE THE TOPIC. DISTRACT. MISLEAD. AVOID. COVER-UP.

They conveniently ignore the REAL unanswered questions of 9/11. They ignore the obvious coverup. They ignore the victims.

This is the Warren Commission DEJA VU.

But this is much worse. We KNOW they are covering up and we KNEW they WOULD a year ago.

In 1964, we believed the government would try to find the truth. We were naive then.

But no longer. The only question is: MIHOP or LIHOP?

They are lying to our face and only Michael Moore has the guts to stand up to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is it my imagination or do they seem more concerned with telling us
who WASN'T at fault than who WAS, who DIDN'T fund than terrorists than who DID, who DIDN'T sell short and make a killing than who DID?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes and no.
Yes, they've shifted the blame, but they've also shown little hesitancy in pointing the finger at Clinton, Tenet, FBI, CIA, etc., when they want someone else to take the fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Would you prefer that they NOT talk about the bogus claims?
Frankly, we have to convince the American people that Bush, Cheney, et al, lied about the reasons for going to war, first.

If they don't even believe that Bush, et al, lied (and half of them don't, even now), they're certainly not going to consider MIHOP or LIHOP claims realistic.

Patience, TruthIsAll. We need to take what we can get and build the case as we go along. The fact that major newspapers are saying BushCo lied about the Iraq claims is a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad As Hell Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. MIHOP? LIHOP?
What do these mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Made/Let It Happen on Purpose
Edited on Sat Jun-19-04 03:28 PM by boxster
MIHOP - Made it happen on purpose
LIHOP - Let it happen on purpose

Those terms refer to theories that the Bush Administration either made 9/11 happen or knew it was going to happen and did nothing to stop it, primarily for political advantage.

Edit: for the record, I'm not convinced that MIHOP is all that likely. I think that LIHOP is slightly more realistic, though I suspect it's also very possible that the Bush Admin is just utterly incompetent and short-sighted and didn't put the available pieces together prior to 9/11. Or didn't care. Which is as bad as LIHOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MajorFlaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. MIHOP=Made it happen on purpose, LIHOP= Let it happen
on purpose.

Welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC