Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WashPost: So how about that economy?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 02:31 PM
Original message
WashPost: So how about that economy?
In today's WashPost White House Briefing blog:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A60120-2004Jun22?language=printer

note: links added.

(snip)

Fact Check

So how about that economy?

Bloomberg (http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000176&sid=adBlakFXPuK0&refer=us_elections) today bursts Bush's economy balloon a bit, reporting: "A 2.2 percent rise in wages in the 12 months through May has been more than offset by a 3.1 percent gain in consumer prices. . . .

"The disparity between pay and prices may keep President George W. Bush from fully capitalizing on the economy's addition of 1.2 million jobs this year, the best five months of job growth since 2000, as he runs for re-election, said political analysts including Thomas Mann of the Brookings Institution in Washington."

Furthermore, Bloomberg writes: "Even with the recent surge in jobs, the economy has had a net loss of 1.5 million jobs during Bush's term, including 2.9 million manufacturing jobs, which typically pay more than the service jobs that account for most of the positions now being added."

Terry Weber(http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20040622/RCIBC22/TPInternational/Americas) writes in the Toronto Globe and Mail: "The U.S. labour market – while finally experiencing increases in job creation – has also seen a dramatic drop in employment quality, with low-paying jobs elbowing aside higher-paying ones, CIBC World Markets said yesterday."

"The brokerage's employment quality index – which measures the overall tone of the market by looking at things such as compensation, job stability and the mix of full-time and part-time employment – fell by eight points between 2001 and 2004, a decline CIBC called dramatic."
****

I am really diggin' Dan Froomkin. Is he influential?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GumboYaYa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is this the same Washington Post that chastised Kerry when he
made the exact same point last week?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-04 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's not a good idea unless they have it first.
Ego.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC