Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Kerry leads Bush in Arkansas Poll 47 percent to 45 (Clinton bump ?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 02:05 AM
Original message
John Kerry leads Bush in Arkansas Poll 47 percent to 45 (Clinton bump ?)
Edited on Wed Jun-23-04 02:06 AM by JI7
if this is true i really believe clinton has a lot to do with it.
while this is still within the margin of error , one should look at how much support bush has lost and how kerry has gained to see the real good news. i love president clinton.

<CPOD) Jun. 23, 2004 – Massachusetts senator John Kerry could carry the state of Arkansas in the 2004 United States presidential election, according to a poll by Zogby Interactive published in the Wall Street Journal Online. 46.8 per cent of respondents would vote for the prospective Democratic nominee, while 44.7 per cent would support Republican incumbent George W. Bush.

Independent candidate Ralph Nader garners the support of 2.1 per cent of respondents. The election is scheduled for Nov. 2.

Support for Bush dropped by 6.5 per cent since early June, while backing for Kerry increased by 3.3 per cent.

Jimmy Carter in 1976—and former governor Bill Clinton in 1992 and 1996—are the only Democrats to carry Arkansas in a presidential election since 1968. Bush won the state’s six electoral votes in 2000, with 51.3 per cent of all cast ballots. >

http://www.cpod.ubc.ca/polls/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewItem&itemID=3140
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. First poll
I've seen with Kerry in the lead in that state! I hope others confirm it, and I hope he keeps it (I think Clark or even Edwards will help a great deal in that state).

Very Cool! This is a great thing to read before going to bed. Thanks!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Great news! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supormom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. Clinton Bump
Is that a new dance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. yeah, but it's a horizontal one
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. maybe it'll spread down this way
It's a good sign for the fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. Tangent: Small Rant
Jimmy Carter in 1976—and former governor Bill Clinton in 1992 and 1996—are the only Democrats to carry Arkansas in a presidential election since 1968. Bush won the state’s six electoral votes in 2000, with 51.3 per cent of all cast ballots.

I hate the subtle ways reporters word things. It's a toss-up whether this is for dramatic effect or is indicative of bias, but either way, it's annoying.

"Only" Carter and Clinton? "Since" 1968, Democrats have taken Arkansas three times and Republicans five times. If we exclude 1972, which was basically a rigged election, it's 3 times to four. In other words, the actual numbers placed in context paint a somewhat different than the word "only" implies. That implication is that Kerry will have a very hard time taking AR, a supposed Republican stronghold. He has a helluva lot better chance than McGovern or Dukakis did. Bush only took it in 2000 by 50,000 votes.

A lot of reporters use "since 1968" as the boundary for things like this. I suspect one reason why is that it dismisses 1968 and its complications and includes 1972, which, for every state but Massachusetts, gives the Republicans an automatic mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. you make a great point!
Thanks for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Racenut20 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. We would be campaigning for President Gore
If Clinton had campaigned in Arkansas in 2000.

This is great news. We were a long ways behind there. Kerry can win by keeping his base and getting the border states. He wouldn't need the deep South.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. bu$h is in DEEP doo-doo.
For openers, this is a Zogby poll. Zogby is the only one of the polling services that I will even pay attention to, because they're usually right.

In the second place, bu$h and/or Cheney have been here six or seven times this year. That alone "should" have kept bu$hie in the lead, given the tendency of Arkies to rally around a leader in times of crisis.

For all the brilliant Democrats we have given the nation--Fulbright, Bumpers, Pryor and Clinton--Arkansas is a conservative place. This election should be a lock for bu$h, except for the fetid, stinking mess he has made of EVERYTHING.

If the Boy King can't carry Arkansas, he's toast!

:bounce:
dbt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. Arkansas IS a tossup
this year and could go either way. Hopefully Democratic resources will be spent there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Kerry is spending in the state
he is also looking to Clinton to help him out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC