A vote for Nader is a vote for Nader, a vote for Kerry is a vote for Kerry

[cheezus]

but only one of them is also a vote AGAINST bush...

[DinahMoeHum]

1. The voting machine does NOT record who you vote against. . .

only who you vote FOR.

And the only FOR vote which is also a vote against Bush is KERRY.

:kick::kick::kick:

[aquart]

2. Disingenuous.

A vote for Nader is a vote for Bush. It is NOT neutral as you attempt to imply. It actively aids the Republican cause.

Blood drips from the hands of Nader voters.

[Adenoid_Hynkel]

3. would that be more or less blood

than is dripping from kerry's hands for voting for the war?

[pleiku52cab]

4. ANYONE

who did vote for Nader, or who will again, has more blood on their hands than JK - wake up you idiots - you can stand around in your ultra liberal purity singing "We Shall Overcome (Someday)" and looking lovingly into each others eyes gleamingly, while the rest of the country goes to hell because you can't realize that in the real world the whole matter rest on who is making the decisions, not in the lofty aspirations of Utopia -- VOTE KERRY OR GO TO HELL WITH ALL THE BUSHITES YOU CLAIM TO DESPISE !!

[silverpatronus]

5. well that kind of attitude will obviously help you win friends...

and influence people < /sarcasm >

[thebigmansentme]

6. the sarcasm tag

doesn't work if you don't open it properly. please refrain from using html if don't know anything about it.

[silverpatronus]

10. yes, attacking my coding will make me feel properly chastened...

how mature of you.

must i put a sarcasm tag on this one too, or did you get it?

[JHBowden]

7. That's hyperbole.

Kerry certainly would use leverage to get inspections in Iraq. But claiming Kerry would pull out the inspectors to arbitrarily start a war is dishonest, and you know it.

Shame on you.

[louis c]

8. Not this again

anyone who doesn't get it by now, is hopeless

[thebigmansentme]

9. history lesson